Best for
Best for people and small teams who want an AI assistant over their own documents that runs locally by default.
- Freelancers
- Small and mid-sized
- Enterprise
No tools match
Press / to search, arrow keys to move, Enter to open
AI Chatbots & Assistants Comparison
At a glance
Best for
Best for people and small teams who want an AI assistant over their own documents that runs locally by default.
Best for
Best for developers and privacy-minded teams who want a desktop assistant whose default model runs locally, with cloud providers optional.
Cataleo does not name a winner. Both statements come from the vendors themselves.
| Criterion | AnythingLLM | Jan |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free desktop app; Cloud from $50 / month The desktop app is free. AnythingLLM Cloud is $50 a month for Basic and $99 a month for Pro, each a private instance with a custom subdomain; Enterprise is quoted. Cloud plans expect you to bring your own LLM API key. | Free and open source The desktop app is free under the Apache 2.0 licence and local models cost nothing beyond the hardware they run on. Cloud models are billed by whichever provider you connect, against your own API key. |
| Free trial | Free desktop app for macOS, Windows and Linux | Free and open source; local models run with no API key |
| Output | A private AI assistant answering over your own documents | A desktop AI assistant answering from local or cloud models |
| API | Yes | Yes, a built-in OpenAI-compatible server on port 1337, powered by llama.cpp |
| Hosting | Desktop app on macOS, Windows and Linux, self-hosted with Docker, or AnythingLLM Cloud | Runs on macOS, Windows and Linux; Tokamak is self-hosted for teams, and cloud models run on the provider you connect |
| Ecosystem | Desktop app for macOS, Windows and Linux, Docker for multi-user self-hosting, AnythingLLM Cloud and mobile apps, with a plugin framework for custom agent skills | Desktop app for macOS, Windows and Linux, with Jan Agent as a separate command-line agent and Tokamak as a self-hosted router carrying policy controls and audit trails for organisations. MCP servers attach under Settings, and documented integrations cover Claude Code and OpenClaw |
| Live web search and sources | Yes, agents can browse and scrape the web | Yes, built in and on by default: web_search and web_fetch are advertised to any model that supports tool use, with a keyless Exa endpoint as the default provider, so no API key and no MCP server are needed. Only tool-capable models see the tools |
| Files and long documents | Yes, documents are embedded into workspaces for retrieval, with configurable chunking and a choice of local or cloud embedding models and vector databases including LanceDB, Chroma, Milvus, Pinecone, Weaviate, Qdrant and AstraDB | Yes, files attach to a single message, or go into a Project where they are chunked and indexed for retrieval across every conversation in it. PDF, Markdown, DOCX, XLSX, PPTX and code files are supported, and processing happens on the machine |
| Images, voice and video | A meeting assistant transcribes and summarises meetings locally with action items and transcripts, plus dictation and context-aware autocomplete | Images and audio attach to a chat when the active model can take them: the image option appears only with a vision-capable model such as Jan-v2-VL, and audio accepts WAV and MP3 |
| Coding help | No code execution skill and no coding mode of its own, so code answers depend on the model you connect. The default agent skills cover RAG search, web browsing and scraping, SQL queries against a database, file system access, chart and document generation and scheduled jobs, and custom skills are written in JavaScript | Jan-Code-4B is available in the Hub for local coding, and Jan Agent runs coding tasks in a terminal with subagents, skills and memory, asking for confirmation before each write and shell command. It is a preview shipped on a nightly channel |
| Model choice | Yes, Anthropic, OpenAI, Google Gemini and Vertex AI, Azure OpenAI, AWS Bedrock, Groq and Mistral in the cloud, or Ollama, LM Studio, LocalAI, KoboldCPP and oMLX locally | Yes, and both kinds mix in the same app: local models through llama.cpp and MLX from the Hub, or cloud models from Anthropic, OpenAI, Azure OpenAI, Gemini, Groq, Mistral AI, OpenRouter and Hugging Face, plus any OpenAI- or Anthropic-compatible endpoint |
| Deployment | more entries Cloud (SaaS), Browser-based, On-premise | On-premise |
| Support | Community forum | Community forum |
| Onboarding | Documentation and knowledge base | Documentation and knowledge base |
| Company size | Freelancers, Small and mid-sized, Enterprise | Freelancers, Small and mid-sized, Enterprise |
| Integrations | more entries Ollama, LM Studio, OpenAI, Anthropic, Google Gemini, Azure OpenAI, AWS Bedrock, Groq, Mistral AI, LanceDB, Chroma, Milvus, Pinecone, Weaviate, Qdrant, AstraDB, Gmail, Google Calendar, Outlook | OpenAI, Anthropic, Google Gemini, Azure OpenAI, Groq, Mistral AI, OpenRouter, Hugging Face, llama.cpp, MLX, Model Context Protocol, Claude Code, OpenClaw, Exa |
Adds a column to the table, from the tools in this category.
Row where the values differ The small markers point at the lower number, the longer list or the stated feature. They describe the data, they are not a verdict.
The short version
Every line is one datapoint from the table above, picked automatically. Nothing here is written text.
The trade-offs
AnythingLLM
Strengths
Limitations
Jan
Strengths
Limitations
Plans
AnythingLLM
Jan
What users say
AnythingLLM
No reviews yet. Be the first to review this tool. Every review is checked for fairness before it appears, and the vendor cannot have one removed.
Jan
No reviews yet. Be the first to review this tool. Every review is checked for fairness before it appears, and the vendor cannot have one removed.
Where this comes from
AnythingLLM https://anythingllm.com · checked against the official source on 2026-09-13
Jan https://jan.ai · checked against the official source on 2026-09-15
This table lists factual criteria taken from information the vendors publish themselves. For how we put it together, see the methodology.