Best for
Best for engineering teams that want an agentic assistant with deep, large-codebase context across the IDE and terminal.
- Small and mid-sized
- Enterprise
No tools match
Press / to search, arrow keys to move, Enter to open
AI Code Comparison
At a glance
Best for
Best for engineering teams that want an agentic assistant with deep, large-codebase context across the IDE and terminal.
Best for
Best for engineering teams that want every pull request reviewed and ranked before a human opens it.
Cataleo does not name a winner. Both statements come from the vendors themselves.
| Criterion | Augment Code | CodeRabbit |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | lower value Standard $20 / month Flat rate for teams up to 50 seats, including $20 of usage across models, context engine and compute; top-ups are pay-as-you-go. Business is $100 per month on the same terms, Enterprise is custom. | Free for open-source repos; Pro $24 / user / month Pro and Pro Plus are quoted billed annually: $24 and $48 per user per month. CodeRabbit Security is $40 per user per month. Enterprise is quoted by sales, and its self-hosted option starts at 500 seats. |
| Free trial | Not stated | 14 days, no credit card; public and open-source repositories are reviewed free permanently |
| Commercial use | Yes | Yes |
| Output | Agentic coding across the IDE and terminal | AI reviews on pull requests, with one-click fixes and pre-merge checks |
| API | Yes, the Auggie SDK for TypeScript/Node.js and Python, plus an Analytics API | Yes, on the Enterprise plan |
| Hosting | Not stated | Cloud, with a self-hosted Enterprise deployment from 500 seats and an EU SaaS region |
| Where it runs | Extensions for VS Code and JetBrains IDEs, plus the Auggie CLI in the terminal | On the pull request in GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket and Azure DevOps, plus a VS Code extension and a CLI |
| Inline completions | Tab-accepted inline completions in VS Code and JetBrains, with word-by-word acceptance; deprecated for non-Enterprise plans on 31 March 2026 and retained on Enterprise | No, it reviews and comments on changes rather than completing code as you type |
| Agent mode | Yes, the Cosmos coding agent with a codebase context engine, in the IDE and CLI | Yes, agentic reviews with one-click fixes, agentic chat, coding agent loops and an issue planner; unit tests, merge-conflict resolution and post-merge actions come with Pro Plus |
| Model choice | Yes, Claude (Sonnet and Opus) and Gemini 2.5 Pro, with a Prism router that balances cost and quality | No model picker; an ensemble of models is used, with code shared with OpenAI and Anthropic for reviewing purposes |
| Data control | SOC 2 Type II; Enterprise adds CMEK, ISO 42001 and SIEM integration | Customer code is never used for training. Encrypted code caches, vector indexes and longer-lived Learnings are stored; self-hosted Enterprise can opt out entirely, and model output logging is off by default for eligible non-open-source organisations |
| Ecosystem fit | MCP and native tool integrations; agents for code review, test coverage and ticket-to-PR workflows | GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket and Azure DevOps including self-managed servers, plus Jira and Linear, MCP connections and a VS Code extension |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS), Browser-based | more entries Cloud (SaaS), Browser-based, On-premise |
| Support | Email helpdesk, Community forum | Not stated |
| Onboarding | Documentation and knowledge base | Documentation and knowledge base |
| Company size | Small and mid-sized, Enterprise | more entries Freelancers, Small and mid-sized, Enterprise |
| Integrations | more entries Visual Studio Code, JetBrains IDEs, GitHub, GitLab, Jira, Linear, Slack, Confluence, Notion, Sentry, Stripe | GitHub, GitHub Enterprise Server, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure DevOps, Jira, Linear, Slack, VS Code |
Adds a column to the table, from the tools in this category.
Row where the values differ The small markers point at the lower number, the longer list or the stated feature. They describe the data, they are not a verdict.
The short version
Every line is one datapoint from the table above, picked automatically. Nothing here is written text.
The trade-offs
Augment Code
Strengths
Limitations
CodeRabbit
Strengths
Limitations
Plans
Augment Code
CodeRabbit
What users say
Augment Code
No reviews yet. Be the first to review this tool. Every review is checked for fairness before it appears, and the vendor cannot have one removed.
CodeRabbit
No reviews yet. Be the first to review this tool. Every review is checked for fairness before it appears, and the vendor cannot have one removed.
Where this comes from
Augment Code https://www.augmentcode.com/ · no check date recorded yet
CodeRabbit https://www.coderabbit.ai · no check date recorded yet
This table lists factual criteria taken from information the vendors publish themselves. For how we put it together, see the methodology.