Best for
Best for developers who want to supervise several coding agents at once and are willing to work inside Google's own IDE.
- Freelancers
- Small and mid-sized
- Enterprise
No tools match
Press / to search, arrow keys to move, Enter to open
AI Code Comparison
At a glance
Best for
Best for developers who want to supervise several coding agents at once and are willing to work inside Google's own IDE.
Best for
Best for teams that want AI to plan work as specifications before writing code.
Cataleo does not name a winner. Both statements come from the vendors themselves.
| Criterion | Google Antigravity | Kiro |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free tier The Individual plan is $0 per month with unlimited tab completions and command requests under basic weekly rate limits. Google AI Pro and Google AI Ultra raise those limits and add an AI credit pool; the pricing page does not state their amounts. Organisations access it through a Google Cloud project with consumption-based pricing. | Free tier; Pro $20 / user / month Credit-based. Pro+ $40, Pro Max $100 and Power $200 per user per month. |
| Free trial | Free Individual plan | Free tier (50 credits) |
| Commercial use | Not stated | Yes |
| Output | Agent-managed code changes, run locally or in an isolated Git worktree | Specs, code, documentation and tests from prompts |
| API | Python SDK for building custom agents | CLI available |
| Where it runs | Its own IDE plus a separate agent command centre, a CLI and a Python SDK; macOS on Apple Silicon and Intel, Windows 10 and later on x64 and ARM64, and Linux on x64 and ARM64 with glibc 2.28 or newer | Desktop IDE for macOS, Windows and Linux (based on Code OSS), plus a CLI, browser sessions in sandboxes and a mobile app |
| Inline completions | Yes, tab completions, unlimited on every plan including the free Individual tier | Not in the editor: the IDE documentation lists syntax highlighting, error indicators, folding, tabs and split view, and code is written through agentic chat and specs rather than as-you-type suggestions. Ghost-text inline suggestions and a command dropdown do exist in the Kiro CLI, for terminal commands such as git, npm, docker and aws, switched with kiro-cli inline enable |
| Agent mode | Yes, agents run inside Projects that bound the folders and repositories they may access, either in Local Mode or in an isolated Git worktree; /goal takes a task to completion, /browser drives Chrome, and tasks can be scheduled once or on a recurring basis | Yes, spec-driven: turns prompts into specs, then code, documentation and tests |
| Model choice | Yes, picked per conversation from Gemini 3.8, 3.7 and 3.6 Flash, Gemini 3.1 Pro, Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Claude Opus 4.6 in thinking mode, and GPT-OSS-120b. Enterprise plans exclude the Claude and GPT models. | Yes, Anthropic Claude, open-weight models, or Auto model routing |
| Data control | Organisations run it inside their own Google Cloud project under the Google Cloud Terms of Service. MCP tools default to Ask mode, so each tool call needs approval before it runs. | Enterprise content is not used for service improvement and is opted out of telemetry by default; free and individual users can switch off usage analytics and content collection in settings. TLS 1.2 or higher in transit, AWS KMS at rest, with customer-managed keys and a chosen storage region for enterprise |
| Ecosystem fit | Extensions for Visual Studio Code, Visual Studio, JetBrains, Zed and Xcode; MCP servers through a built-in MCP Store or a mcp_config.json file; browser control in Chrome | AWS-built; supports MCP, Agent Client Protocol and Skills.md; imports VS Code settings and Open VSX plugins |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS) | more entries Cloud (SaaS), Browser-based |
| Support | Not stated | Email helpdesk, Community forum |
| Onboarding | Documentation and knowledge base | Documentation and knowledge base |
| Company size | Freelancers, Small and mid-sized, Enterprise | Freelancers, Small and mid-sized, Enterprise |
| Integrations | Not stated | Figma, Terraform, Datadog, Stripe |
Adds a column to the table, from the tools in this category.
Row where the values differ The small markers point at the lower number, the longer list or the stated feature. They describe the data, they are not a verdict.
The short version
Every line is one datapoint from the table above, picked automatically. Nothing here is written text.
The trade-offs
Google Antigravity
Strengths
Limitations
Kiro
Strengths
Limitations
Plans
Google Antigravity
Kiro
What users say
Google Antigravity
No reviews yet. Be the first to review this tool. Every review is checked for fairness before it appears, and the vendor cannot have one removed.
Kiro
No reviews yet. Be the first to review this tool. Every review is checked for fairness before it appears, and the vendor cannot have one removed.
Where this comes from
Google Antigravity https://antigravity.google · checked against the official source on 2026-09-07
Kiro https://kiro.dev · no check date recorded yet
This table lists factual criteria taken from information the vendors publish themselves. For how we put it together, see the methodology.