Best for
Best for writers and teams working in several languages who want the same checker inside their browser, office suite and mail client.
- Freelancers
- Small and mid-sized
- Enterprise
No tools match
Press / to search, arrow keys to move, Enter to open
AI Writing Comparison
At a glance
Best for
Best for writers and teams working in several languages who want the same checker inside their browser, office suite and mail client.
Best for
Best for authors and screenwriters who want AI help drafting and editing long-form fiction.
Cataleo does not name a winner. Both statements come from the vendors themselves.
| Criterion | LanguageTool | Type |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free tier Premium is billed monthly, quarterly, annually or for two years; Teams is priced per user for 2 to 1,000 or more users. | Free tier; Basic from $8 / month Basic $96 billed annually; Pro $16 / month, Max $64 / month. Paid plans include the latest models from Anthropic, OpenAI and Google. |
| Free trial | Free tier | Free plan available |
| Commercial use | Not stated | Yes |
| Output | Spelling, grammar, punctuation and style corrections, plus AI paraphrased sentences | Books, screenplays and long-form writing |
| Languages | More than 30 languages and dialects, with six English varieties | Not stated |
| Hosting | Cloud (SaaS), API servers in Germany; the source code is published for self-hosting | Not stated |
| Content types | Checks and rewrites text the writer has already started rather than generating a content format; Premium raises the limit to 150,000 characters per text field, which covers blog articles, letters and long e-mails | Books, novels, screenplays and long-form stories, up to about 150,000 words per document |
| Brand voice | Yes, a Style Guide of custom rules for consistent wording, and a shared Team Style Guide plus a Team Dictionary of technical terms on the Teams plan | Custom writing rules capture the quirks of your own style |
| Content scoring | No content or readability score. The editor's Statistics view tracks writing activity over time, the languages used, the errors made and the suggestions applied, which measures the writer's habits rather than rating a piece of text | No score or grade for a draft; feedback comes from the document-aware AI chat instead |
| Drafting tools | Yes, an AI paraphrasing tool that rewrites a sentence to be more formal, more fluid or shorter, uncapped on Premium | Yes, AI drafting, rewriting, tone adjustment and expand or condense, plus a Notes feature for characters, settings and scenes |
| Templates | No content templates. LanguageTool corrects and rephrases text the writer brings to it; the only things reusable across documents are the personal dictionary and the Style Guide rules | Yes, a library of more than 50 curated writing templates covering professional, blog, email and social formats, dropped into a document as a starting point |
| Team workflows | Yes, the Teams plan adds e-mail invitations, user management, a shared style guide and a shared dictionary for 2 to 1,000 or more users | No shared workspace and no team plan. A finished document goes out as a private view-only link or as a DOCX for editing elsewhere |
| API | Yes, the Proofreading HTTP API with JSON responses, monthly tiers from 100 to 10,000 requests, up to 60,000 characters per request, customisable rules and personal dictionary access, served from Germany without storing the submitted text | No, Type publishes no developer API |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS), Browser-based | Cloud (SaaS), Browser-based |
| Support | Not stated | Email helpdesk |
| Onboarding | Documentation and knowledge base | Not stated |
| Company size | more entries Freelancers, Small and mid-sized, Enterprise | Freelancers |
| Integrations | Chrome, Microsoft Edge, Mozilla Firefox, Opera, Google Docs, Microsoft Word, Apple Pages, LibreOffice, Gmail, Outlook, Apple Mail, Thunderbird, macOS, Windows | Not stated |
Adds a column to the table, from the tools in this category.
Row where the values differ The small markers point at the lower number, the longer list or the stated feature. They describe the data, they are not a verdict.
The short version
Every line is one datapoint from the table above, picked automatically. Nothing here is written text.
The trade-offs
LanguageTool
Strengths
Limitations
Type
Strengths
Limitations
Plans
LanguageTool
Type
What users say
LanguageTool
No reviews yet. Be the first to review this tool. Every review is checked for fairness before it appears, and the vendor cannot have one removed.
Type
No reviews yet. Be the first to review this tool. Every review is checked for fairness before it appears, and the vendor cannot have one removed.
Where this comes from
LanguageTool https://languagetool.org · checked against the official source on 2026-09-09
Type https://type.ai · checked against the official source on 2026-09-06
This table lists factual criteria taken from information the vendors publish themselves. For how we put it together, see the methodology.