Best for
Best for teams that want to build custom project and work-tracking apps on a flexible database rather than adopt a fixed tool.
- Freelancers
- Small and mid-sized
- Enterprise
No tools match
Press / to search, arrow keys to move, Enter to open
Project Management Comparison
At a glance
Best for
Best for teams that want to build custom project and work-tracking apps on a flexible database rather than adopt a fixed tool.
Best for
Best for software and engineering teams that want a free, self-hosted tracker tied to their own repositories.
Cataleo does not name a winner. Both statements come from the vendors themselves.
| Criterion | Airtable | Redmine |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free; Team from $20 / user / month Billed annually. Business $45 per user and month, Enterprise Scale on request. Paid per seat for users with edit access; read-only collaborators, form submissions and share links are free. | Free (open source, self-hosted) |
| Free trial | Free tier | Not stated |
| API | Yes, a developer API plus built-in automations | Yes, a REST API in XML and JSON |
| Languages | Not stated | 49 |
| Hosting | Cloud (SaaS) | Self-hosted; no vendor-hosted edition |
| Made in | USA | Not stated |
| Task planning | Yes, work and projects in grid, kanban, calendar and gantt views | Yes, issue tracking with customizable statuses, types and workflows, plus Gantt charts and calendars generated from issue dates |
| Resource planning | No dedicated module; allocation is built on your own tables and Interfaces, with Airtable's resource planning, resource allocation and capacity planning templates as a starting point | No capacity or workload planning in the core: issues are assigned per person and Gantt charts are drawn from issue dates, and anything beyond that comes from third-party plugins |
| Time tracking | No dedicated module; hours are recorded in fields on a base you set up, with Airtable's time management and contractor time tracker templates as a starting point | Yes, part of the core, with time entered at project or issue level and reporting by user, type, category or activity |
| Reporting and controlling | Dashboards and charts through Interfaces | Yes, time entry reports by user, type, category or activity, plus issue filtering on custom fields |
| Integrations and API | Yes, a developer API plus built-in automations | Yes, a REST API in XML and JSON, plus repository integration with Subversion, CVS, Mercurial, Bazaar and Git |
| AI features | stated Yes | No |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS), Browser-based | Browser-based, On-premise |
| Support | more entries Email helpdesk, Community forum | Community forum |
| Onboarding | more entries Documentation and knowledge base, Video tutorials, Live online demos and webinars | Documentation and knowledge base |
| Company size | Freelancers, Small and mid-sized, Enterprise | Not stated |
| Integrations | more entries Slack, Gmail, Google Drive, Google Calendar, Outlook Calendar, Dropbox, Box, Salesforce, Zendesk, Jira, GitHub, Stripe, Twilio, Typeform, Jotform, Miro, Unito, WordPress, Snowflake, Databricks, Tableau Cloud | Subversion, Git, Mercurial, Bazaar, CVS, LDAP |
Adds a column to the table, from the tools in this category.
Row where the values differ The small markers point at the lower number, the longer list or the stated feature. They describe the data, they are not a verdict.
The short version
Every line is one datapoint from the table above, picked automatically. Nothing here is written text.
The trade-offs
Airtable
Strengths
Limitations
Redmine
Strengths
Limitations
Plans
Airtable
Redmine
What users say
Airtable
No reviews yet. Be the first to review this tool. Every review is checked for fairness before it appears, and the vendor cannot have one removed.
Redmine
No reviews yet. Be the first to review this tool. Every review is checked for fairness before it appears, and the vendor cannot have one removed.
Where this comes from
Airtable https://www.airtable.com · checked against the official source on 2026-09-06
Redmine https://www.redmine.org · checked against the official source on 2026-09-07
This table lists factual criteria taken from information the vendors publish themselves. For how we put it together, see the methodology.