CataleoSoftware Get Your Software Listed Get Listed

Project Management Comparison

Airtable vs. Redmine

At a glance

At a glance

Airtable

Best for

Best for teams that want to build custom project and work-tracking apps on a flexible database rather than adopt a fixed tool.

  • Freelancers
  • Small and mid-sized
  • Enterprise

Redmine

Best for

Best for software and engineering teams that want a free, self-hosted tracker tied to their own repositories.

Cataleo does not name a winner. Both statements come from the vendors themselves.

Full Comparison

Criterion Airtable Redmine
Starting price Free; Team from $20 / user / month Billed annually. Business $45 per user and month, Enterprise Scale on request. Paid per seat for users with edit access; read-only collaborators, form submissions and share links are free. Free (open source, self-hosted)
Free trial Free tier Not stated
API Yes, a developer API plus built-in automations Yes, a REST API in XML and JSON
Languages Not stated 49
Hosting Cloud (SaaS) Self-hosted; no vendor-hosted edition
Made in USA Not stated
Task planning Yes, work and projects in grid, kanban, calendar and gantt views Yes, issue tracking with customizable statuses, types and workflows, plus Gantt charts and calendars generated from issue dates
Resource planning No dedicated module; allocation is built on your own tables and Interfaces, with Airtable's resource planning, resource allocation and capacity planning templates as a starting point No capacity or workload planning in the core: issues are assigned per person and Gantt charts are drawn from issue dates, and anything beyond that comes from third-party plugins
Time tracking No dedicated module; hours are recorded in fields on a base you set up, with Airtable's time management and contractor time tracker templates as a starting point Yes, part of the core, with time entered at project or issue level and reporting by user, type, category or activity
Reporting and controlling Dashboards and charts through Interfaces Yes, time entry reports by user, type, category or activity, plus issue filtering on custom fields
Integrations and API Yes, a developer API plus built-in automations Yes, a REST API in XML and JSON, plus repository integration with Subversion, CVS, Mercurial, Bazaar and Git
AI features stated Yes No
Deployment Cloud (SaaS), Browser-based Browser-based, On-premise
Support more entries Email helpdesk, Community forum Community forum
Onboarding more entries Documentation and knowledge base, Video tutorials, Live online demos and webinars Documentation and knowledge base
Company size Freelancers, Small and mid-sized, Enterprise Not stated
Integrations more entries Slack, Gmail, Google Drive, Google Calendar, Outlook Calendar, Dropbox, Box, Salesforce, Zendesk, Jira, GitHub, Stripe, Twilio, Typeform, Jotform, Miro, Unito, WordPress, Snowflake, Databricks, Tableau Cloud Subversion, Git, Mercurial, Bazaar, CVS, LDAP

Compare more tools

Row where the values differ The small markers point at the lower number, the longer list or the stated feature. They describe the data, they are not a verdict.

The short version

Key Differences

  • Starting price Airtable Free; Team from $20 / user / month Redmine Free (open source, self-hosted)
  • Deployment Airtable Cloud (SaaS), Browser-based Redmine Browser-based, On-premise
  • Hosting Airtable Cloud (SaaS) Redmine Self-hosted; no vendor-hosted edition
  • Support Airtable Email helpdesk, Community forum Redmine Community forum
  • AI features Airtable Yes Redmine No

Every line is one datapoint from the table above, picked automatically. Nothing here is written text.

The trade-offs

Strengths and Limitations

Airtable

Strengths

  • Flexible relational database that adapts to many workflows
  • Grid, kanban, calendar and gantt views plus a custom Interface builder
  • Airtable AI and automations built in, with a free tier and a developer API

Limitations

  • Not a purpose-built project manager; resource planning and time tracking need a custom setup
  • Per-seat pricing for edit users adds up for larger teams

Redmine

Strengths

  • Free and open source under the GNU General Public License v2, with no per-user cost
  • Self-hosted, so project data stays on your own infrastructure
  • Repository integration with Subversion, CVS, Mercurial, Bazaar and Git
  • REST API in XML and JSON covering issues, projects, users and time entries
  • Available in forty-nine languages and runs on MySQL, PostgreSQL or SQLite

Limitations

  • No vendor-hosted edition, so you run, secure and upgrade the installation yourself
  • No resource or capacity planning in the core application
  • Requires a Ruby on Rails stack and a database to operate

Plans

Pricing

Airtable

  • Free $0 For individuals or small teams getting started.
  • Team $20 Per user and month, billed annually.
  • Business $45 Per user and month, billed annually.
  • Enterprise Scale Custom On request.
Visit site

Redmine

  • Open source Free Released under the GNU General Public License v2. Self-hosted, so you provide and run the server.
Visit site

What users say

Review Scores · opens after launch

Airtable

Ease of use
Not rated yet
User interface
Not rated yet
Onboarding
Not rated yet
Support and service
Not rated yet
Value for money
Not rated yet
Features
Not rated yet

No reviews yet. Be the first to review this tool. Every review is checked for fairness before it appears, and the vendor cannot have one removed.

Redmine

Ease of use
Not rated yet
User interface
Not rated yet
Onboarding
Not rated yet
Support and service
Not rated yet
Value for money
Not rated yet
Features
Not rated yet

No reviews yet. Be the first to review this tool. Every review is checked for fairness before it appears, and the vendor cannot have one removed.

Where this comes from

Where this comes from

Airtable https://www.airtable.com · checked against the official source on 2026-09-06

Redmine https://www.redmine.org · checked against the official source on 2026-09-07

This table lists factual criteria taken from information the vendors publish themselves. For how we put it together, see the methodology.