Best for
Best for organizations that need detailed scheduling and resource management within the Microsoft ecosystem.
- Small and mid-sized
- Enterprise
No tools match
Press / to search, arrow keys to move, Enter to open
Project Management Comparison
At a glance
Best for
Best for organizations that need detailed scheduling and resource management within the Microsoft ecosystem.
Best for
Best for professional-services firms that want projects, resources and finances in one PSA, from small consultancies to enterprises.
Cataleo does not name a winner. Both statements come from the vendors themselves.
| Criterion | Microsoft Project | Scoro |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | From $10 / user / month Planner Plan 1, paid yearly. Planner and Project Plan 3 is $30 per user and month and adds the desktop client. Desktop licenses are one-time: Project Standard $679.99, Project Professional $1,129.99. Project Server runs on-premises through a partner. | From €15 / user / month Time-billing bundle, minimum 5 users. The price rises with the apps combined, up to €52 for the end-to-end bundle; annual billing is 13 to 17 percent cheaper. |
| Free trial | Not stated | 14 days, no credit card |
| Languages | Not stated | English, German, Estonian, French, Spanish |
| Hosting | Not stated | Cloud, GDPR-compliant |
| Made in | United States (Microsoft) | Estonia |
| Task planning | Yes, Gantt scheduling with task dependencies and baselines, plus grid, board and timeline views in the web app | Yes, quote-to-invoice, Gantt, tasks and subtasks |
| Resource planning | Yes, resource assignment and management across projects, fuller in Project Professional and the higher plans | Yes, with capacity forecasting |
| Time tracking | Timesheet capture in Project Online and the higher Project plans | Yes, billable and non-billable |
| Reporting and controlling | Yes, built-in reports and dashboards, with Power BI for portfolio reporting | Yes, real-time financials and profitability forecasting |
| Integrations and API | Yes, through Power Platform connectors and Microsoft Graph | Yes, API plus integrations with accounting, calendar and automation tools |
| AI features | No | stated Yes |
| Deployment | more entries Cloud (SaaS), Browser-based, On-premise | Cloud (SaaS), Browser-based |
| Support | Email helpdesk, Phone, Community forum | Email helpdesk, Phone, Chat |
| Onboarding | more entries Documentation and knowledge base, Video tutorials | Personal consulting |
| Company size | Small and mid-sized, Enterprise | Small and mid-sized, Enterprise |
| Integrations | Microsoft Teams, Power BI, Power Automate, SharePoint | more entries Xero, QuickBooks, Sage Intacct, Exact Online, Google Calendar, Microsoft Exchange, HubSpot, Salesforce, Jira, Stripe, Expensify, Zapier |
Adds a column to the table, from the tools in this category.
Row where the values differ The small markers point at the lower number, the longer list or the stated feature. They describe the data, they are not a verdict.
The short version
Every line is one datapoint from the table above, picked automatically. Nothing here is written text.
The trade-offs
Microsoft Project
Strengths
Limitations
Scoro
Strengths
Limitations
Plans
Microsoft Project
Scoro
What users say
Microsoft Project
No reviews yet. Be the first to review this tool. Every review is checked for fairness before it appears, and the vendor cannot have one removed.
Scoro
No reviews yet. Be the first to review this tool. Every review is checked for fairness before it appears, and the vendor cannot have one removed.
Where this comes from
Microsoft Project https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/project/project-management-software · checked against the official source on 2026-08-22
Scoro https://www.scoro.com · checked against the official source on 2026-09-01
This table lists factual criteria taken from information the vendors publish themselves. For how we put it together, see the methodology.