CataleoSoftware Get Your Software Listed Get Listed

Resource Planning Comparison

Epicflow vs. Forecast

At a glance

At a glance

Epicflow

Best for

Best for engineering, defence and manufacturing organisations running many projects against one shared pool of specialists, where priorities have to be settled across the portfolio rather than inside a single plan.

  • Enterprise

Forecast

Best for

Best for services teams that want AI to combine resourcing, projects and financials.

  • Small and mid-sized
  • Enterprise

Cataleo does not name a winner. Both statements come from the vendors themselves.

Full Comparison

Criterion Epicflow Forecast
Starting price From €22.50 / person / month Growth plan billed annually, €25 per person per month on monthly billing. Growth covers 20 to 50 users, up to 50 projects and a maximum of 250 tasks; licences are annual with monthly payment available. Quote-based The vendor prices per quote.
Free trial Free 30-day trial with unlimited user access, including a weekly 30-minute support call Demo or trial
Hosting Cloud, with a DataGuard option that keeps company data on the customer's own premises Not stated
Made in Netherlands (Glow Management Nederland BV, Amsterdam) Denmark
Resource planning Yes, resource groups and competence-based allocation with capacity planning, a Historical Load Graph of past utilisation, a Future Load Graph projecting demand, and what-if simulation of a change before it is committed Yes, with AI auto-scheduling and predictive forecasting
Task planning Yes, a pipeline view across projects and a Gantt chart with dependencies, with task priority recalculated automatically across the whole portfolio rather than per project Yes, combined project, resource and financial management with retainer and portfolio views
Time tracking Yes, timesheets that record what teams delivered over time and set it against the original estimates Yes, including timesheets
Reporting and controlling Yes, real-time dashboards on project health, burn-up charts of completed against remaining work, progress analysis and generated basic and advanced reports Yes, predictive forecasting across projects and portfolios
AI features Yes Yes
Deployment Cloud (SaaS), Browser-based Cloud (SaaS), Browser-based
Support Email helpdesk, Phone Not stated
Onboarding more entries Guided onboarding, Live online demos and webinars, Personal consulting Guided onboarding
Company size Enterprise more entries Small and mid-sized, Enterprise
Integrations Microsoft Project, Microsoft Project Server, Jira, Oracle Primavera, SAP more entries Jira, Asana, Slack, QuickBooks, Xero, Salesforce

Compare more tools

Row where the values differ The small markers point at the lower number, the longer list or the stated feature. They describe the data, they are not a verdict.

The short version

Key Differences

  • Starting price Epicflow From €22.50 / person / month Forecast Quote-based
  • Free trial Epicflow Free 30-day trial with unlimited user access, including a weekly 30-minute support call Forecast Demo or trial
  • Company size Epicflow Enterprise Forecast Small and mid-sized, Enterprise
  • Made in Epicflow Netherlands (Glow Management Nederland BV, Amsterdam) Forecast Denmark
  • Resource planning Epicflow Yes, resource groups and competence-based allocation with capacity planning, a Historical Load Graph of past utilisation, a Future Load Graph projecting demand, and what-if simulation of a change before it is committed Forecast Yes, with AI auto-scheduling and predictive forecasting

Every line is one datapoint from the table above, picked automatically. Nothing here is written text.

The trade-offs

Strengths and Limitations

Epicflow

Strengths

  • Priorities are recalculated across the entire portfolio, so a slip in one project reorders the queue everywhere it competes for the same people
  • What-if simulation and a forward load graph let a resourcing decision be tested before it is made
  • DataGuard keeps company data on the customer's own premises, which matters in defence, government and healthcare

Limitations

  • The Growth plan starts at 20 users and caps at 50 projects and 250 tasks, so small teams and large portfolios both fall outside it
  • Enterprise pricing is quoted rather than published
  • Integrations centre on heavyweight planning systems such as Microsoft Project, Primavera and SAP, and connector work is handled as part of implementation rather than through published API documentation

Forecast

Strengths

  • AI auto-scheduling
  • Combines project management, resourcing and financials
  • Good for professional-services automation

Limitations

  • Quote-based pricing is less transparent
  • Heavier than a simple scheduler

Plans

Pricing

Epicflow

  • Growth €22.50 / person / month Billed annually, €25 per person per month billed monthly. From 20 to 50 users, up to 50 projects, maximum 250 tasks.
  • Enterprise Not stated Quoted. From 50 users upwards, unlimited projects, 2000+ tasks, with cloud or DataGuard private virtual server.
Visit site

Forecast

  • Not stated Not stated Quote-based, ask the vendor.
Visit site

What users say

Review Scores · opens after launch

Epicflow

Ease of use
Not rated yet
User interface
Not rated yet
Onboarding
Not rated yet
Support and service
Not rated yet
Value for money
Not rated yet
Features
Not rated yet

No reviews yet. Be the first to review this tool. Every review is checked for fairness before it appears, and the vendor cannot have one removed.

Forecast

Ease of use
Not rated yet
User interface
Not rated yet
Onboarding
Not rated yet
Support and service
Not rated yet
Value for money
Not rated yet
Features
Not rated yet

No reviews yet. Be the first to review this tool. Every review is checked for fairness before it appears, and the vendor cannot have one removed.

Where this comes from

Where this comes from

Epicflow https://www.epicflow.com · no check date recorded yet

Forecast https://www.accelo.com/forecast · no check date recorded yet

This table lists factual criteria taken from information the vendors publish themselves. For how we put it together, see the methodology.