Best for
Best for engineering, defence and manufacturing organisations running many projects against one shared pool of specialists, where priorities have to be settled across the portfolio rather than inside a single plan.
- Enterprise
No tools match
Press / to search, arrow keys to move, Enter to open
Resource Planning Comparison
At a glance
Best for
Best for engineering, defence and manufacturing organisations running many projects against one shared pool of specialists, where priorities have to be settled across the portfolio rather than inside a single plan.
Best for
Best for professional services firms that need resource management tied to project financials and forecasting.
Cataleo does not name a winner. Both statements come from the vendors themselves.
| Criterion | Epicflow | Kantata |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | From €22.50 / person / month Growth plan billed annually, €25 per person per month on monthly billing. Growth covers 20 to 50 users, up to 50 projects and a maximum of 250 tasks; licences are annual with monthly payment available. | Quote-based The vendor prices per quote; no public pricing. |
| Free trial | Free 30-day trial with unlimited user access, including a weekly 30-minute support call | Demo |
| Hosting | Cloud, with a DataGuard option that keeps company data on the customer's own premises | Not stated |
| Made in | Netherlands (Glow Management Nederland BV, Amsterdam) | Not stated |
| Resource planning | Yes, resource groups and competence-based allocation with capacity planning, a Historical Load Graph of past utilisation, a Future Load Graph projecting demand, and what-if simulation of a change before it is committed | Yes, demand forecasting, capacity optimization and skills-based staffing |
| Task planning | Yes, a pipeline view across projects and a Gantt chart with dependencies, with task priority recalculated automatically across the whole portfolio rather than per project | Yes, project management that surfaces scope creep and delivery risk |
| Time tracking | Yes, timesheets that record what teams delivered over time and set it against the original estimates | Yes |
| Reporting and controlling | Yes, real-time dashboards on project health, burn-up charts of completed against remaining work, progress analysis and generated basic and advanced reports | Yes, business intelligence with predictive forecasts, no separate BI tool needed |
| AI features | Yes | Yes |
| MCP-ready | No | stated Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS), Browser-based | Cloud (SaaS), Browser-based |
| Support | Email helpdesk, Phone | Email helpdesk, Community forum |
| Onboarding | Guided onboarding, Live online demos and webinars, Personal consulting | more entries Documentation and knowledge base, Guided onboarding, Live online demos and webinars, Personal consulting |
| Company size | Enterprise | more entries Small and mid-sized, Enterprise |
| Integrations | Microsoft Project, Microsoft Project Server, Jira, Oracle Primavera, SAP | more entries Salesforce, NetSuite, QuickBooks, Xero, Sage, Avalara, Expensify, Concur, HubSpot, Jira, BambooHR, Slack, Microsoft 365, Microsoft Teams, MuleSoft, Workato |
Adds a column to the table, from the tools in this category.
Row where the values differ The small markers point at the lower number, the longer list or the stated feature. They describe the data, they are not a verdict.
The short version
Every line is one datapoint from the table above, picked automatically. Nothing here is written text.
The trade-offs
Epicflow
Strengths
Limitations
Kantata
Strengths
Limitations
Plans
Epicflow
Kantata
What users say
Epicflow
No reviews yet. Be the first to review this tool. Every review is checked for fairness before it appears, and the vendor cannot have one removed.
Kantata
No reviews yet. Be the first to review this tool. Every review is checked for fairness before it appears, and the vendor cannot have one removed.
Where this comes from
Epicflow https://www.epicflow.com · no check date recorded yet
Kantata https://www.kantata.com · no check date recorded yet
This table lists factual criteria taken from information the vendors publish themselves. For how we put it together, see the methodology.