Best for
Best for engineering organisations that want planning, code, CI/CD and security on one platform.
- Small and mid-sized
- Enterprise
No tools match
Press / to search, arrow keys to move, Enter to open
Project Management Comparison
At a glance
Best for
Best for engineering organisations that want planning, code, CI/CD and security on one platform.
Best for
Best for individuals and small teams that want a fast, low-friction task manager rather than a heavy project suite.
Cataleo does not name a winner. Both statements come from the vendors themselves.
| Criterion | GitLab | Todoist |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free plan; Premium $29 / user / month Premium is billed annually and includes 10,000 compute minutes and 500 GiB of storage a month; Ultimate is priced on request. The free plan is capped at five users per top-level group. GitLab Credits for AI features cost $1 each, extra compute minutes $10 per 1,000 and extra storage $5 a month per 10 GiB. Enterprise Agile Planning seats for non-developers cost $15 per user and month on Ultimate. | Free Paid Pro and Business plans are billed per user; the amounts did not render on the official pricing page at time of writing. |
| Free trial | Free plan | Free tier |
| API | Yes, APIs and webhooks | Yes, 90+ integrations |
| Hosting | GitLab.com SaaS, single-tenant Dedicated or self-managed | Cloud (SaaS) |
| Task planning | Yes, an agile planning framework with epics, issues and tasks, kanban boards, milestones, roadmaps, issue weights, promotion of an issue to an epic and a planning hierarchy for portfolio work | Yes, tasks and projects in list, board and calendar layouts with labels, filters and reminders |
| Resource planning | Limited. Work is assigned to people and weighted, and weights roll up to the parent item as a measure of time, value or complexity, but GitLab's planning documentation describes no capacity, availability or workload view per person | No workload or capacity view. Work is spread by assigning tasks in shared team projects, and who is carrying what is read back through filters such as assigned to: others, assigned by: me or workspace: name rather than from a capacity chart |
| Time tracking | Yes, hours spent on issues, merge requests, epics and tasks, with estimates, detailed reports and standardised time units | No built-in timer. The Pro plan adds a duration on a task, which is a planned length rather than recorded time, and actual tracking comes from integrations: Toggl Track, Clockify, TimeCamp, Everhour, TMetric, Timeneye, TrackingTime, Time Doctor and WebWork Tracker |
| Reporting and controlling | Yes, burnup and burndown charts, drill-down reports, code and productivity analytics, insights and health reporting, DORA4 metrics and the Value Streams Dashboard | Yes, productivity reporting with activity history on paid plans |
| Integrations and API | Yes, APIs, webhooks and integrations, described by GitLab as how other tools plug into the platform | Yes, 90+ integrations |
| AI features | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | more entries Cloud (SaaS), Browser-based, On-premise | Cloud (SaaS), Browser-based |
| Support | Email helpdesk, Community forum | Not stated |
| Onboarding | more entries Documentation and knowledge base, Video tutorials | Documentation and knowledge base |
| Company size | Small and mid-sized, Enterprise | Freelancers, Small and mid-sized |
| Integrations | Jira, Slack, Microsoft Teams, Confluence, Jenkins, Datadog, GitHub, Asana, Linear, Redmine, Google Chat, Mattermost, Discord, Google Play, Apple App Store Connect, GitGuardian | Google Calendar, Outlook Calendar, Gmail, Outlook Mail, Slack, Microsoft Teams, Twist, Zapier, IFTTT, Make, Jira, Trello, Toggl Track, Clockify, TimeCamp, Everhour |
Adds a column to the table, from the tools in this category.
Row where the values differ The small markers point at the lower number, the longer list or the stated feature. They describe the data, they are not a verdict.
The short version
Every line is one datapoint from the table above, picked automatically. Nothing here is written text.
The trade-offs
GitLab
Strengths
Limitations
Todoist
Strengths
Limitations
Plans
GitLab
Todoist
What users say
GitLab
No reviews yet. Be the first to review this tool. Every review is checked for fairness before it appears, and the vendor cannot have one removed.
Todoist
No reviews yet. Be the first to review this tool. Every review is checked for fairness before it appears, and the vendor cannot have one removed.
Where this comes from
GitLab https://about.gitlab.com · checked against the official source on 2026-09-13
Todoist https://todoist.com · checked against the official source on 2026-08-22
This table lists factual criteria taken from information the vendors publish themselves. For how we put it together, see the methodology.