Best for
Best for small and mid-sized agencies that want the whole process from lead to invoice in one German-hosted system.
- Small and mid-sized
No tools match
Press / to search, arrow keys to move, Enter to open
Project Management Comparison
At a glance
Best for
Best for small and mid-sized agencies that want the whole process from lead to invoice in one German-hosted system.
Best for
Best for organizations that need detailed scheduling and resource management within the Microsoft ecosystem.
Cataleo does not name a winner. Both statements come from the vendors themselves.
| Criterion | helloHQ | Microsoft Project |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | From €35 / user / month Team plan, no base fee, minimum 3 users; €29.75 per user in the first contract year. The Pro and Enterprise plans add a monthly base fee of €180 and €600. | From $10 / user / month Planner Plan 1, paid yearly. Planner and Project Plan 3 is $30 per user and month and adds the desktop client. Desktop licenses are one-time: Project Standard $679.99, Project Professional $1,129.99. Project Server runs on-premises through a partner. |
| Free trial | 14 days | Not stated |
| Languages | German, English | Not stated |
| Hosting | Cloud, hosted in Germany, GDPR-compliant | Not stated |
| Made in | Germany | United States (Microsoft) |
| Task planning | Yes, project and multi-project management with kanban, checklists and roadmaps | Yes, Gantt scheduling with task dependencies and baselines, plus grid, board and timeline views in the web app |
| Resource planning | Yes, resource, capacity and vacation planning | Yes, resource assignment and management across projects, fuller in Project Professional and the higher plans |
| Time tracking | Yes | Timesheet capture in Project Online and the higher Project plans |
| Reporting and controlling | Yes, controlling and dashboards, including a PowerBI connection | Yes, built-in reports and dashboards, with Power BI for portfolio reporting |
| Integrations and API | Yes, REST API | Yes, through Power Platform connectors and Microsoft Graph |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS), Browser-based | more entries Cloud (SaaS), Browser-based, On-premise |
| Support | Email helpdesk, Phone, Chat | Email helpdesk, Phone, Community forum |
| Onboarding | more entries Live online demos and webinars, Personal consulting, On-site training | Documentation and knowledge base, Video tutorials |
| Company size | Small and mid-sized | more entries Small and mid-sized, Enterprise |
| Integrations | more entries PowerBI, Microsoft Exchange, awork, Jira, Personio, agicap, Zapier, Memtime, REST API | Microsoft Teams, Power BI, Power Automate, SharePoint |
Adds a column to the table, from the tools in this category.
Row where the values differ The small markers point at the lower number, the longer list or the stated feature. They describe the data, they are not a verdict.
The short version
Every line is one datapoint from the table above, picked automatically. Nothing here is written text.
The trade-offs
helloHQ
Strengths
Limitations
Microsoft Project
Strengths
Limitations
Plans
helloHQ
Microsoft Project
What users say
helloHQ
No reviews yet. Be the first to review this tool. Every review is checked for fairness before it appears, and the vendor cannot have one removed.
Microsoft Project
No reviews yet. Be the first to review this tool. Every review is checked for fairness before it appears, and the vendor cannot have one removed.
Where this comes from
helloHQ https://www.hellohq.io · checked against the official source on 2026-08-14
Microsoft Project https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/project/project-management-software · checked against the official source on 2026-08-22
This table lists factual criteria taken from information the vendors publish themselves. For how we put it together, see the methodology.