Best for
Best for agencies and service teams that want strong project management, time tracking and resource planning with EU/German hosting, without built-in invoicing.
- Freelancers
- Small and mid-sized
No tools match
Press / to search, arrow keys to move, Enter to open
Resource Planning Comparison
At a glance
Best for
Best for agencies and service teams that want strong project management, time tracking and resource planning with EU/German hosting, without built-in invoicing.
Best for
Best for mid-sized to large service providers that need project management and ERP in one method-independent system, with a cloud or on-premise choice.
Cataleo does not name a winner. Both statements come from the vendors themselves.
| Criterion | awork | Projektron BCS |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | lower value From €5 / user / month Billed annually. | From 20 Euro / licence / month BCS.light in the cloud, per licence and month, six-month minimum term. As a one-off on-premise purchase BCS.light costs 200 Euro per licence with no minimum term. Full BCS costs 300 to 350 Euro per user as an on-premise purchase, or 5 percent of that purchase price per user and month in the cloud; the exact figure depends on the range of functions. All prices exclusive of VAT. |
| Free trial | 14 days | Demo via web conference |
| Languages | German, English | Available in 7-8 languages |
| Hosting | EU (Germany, Frankfurt), ISO/IEC 27001 certified, GDPR-compliant | Cloud (Germany) or on-premise |
| Made in | Germany (Hamburg) | Germany (Berlin) |
| Resource planning | Yes, resource and capacity planning | Yes, resource management and planning |
| Task planning | Yes, kanban, lists and timeline/Gantt | Yes, project and multi-project management supporting IPMA, PMI, PRINCE2, Scrum, Kanban, Hermes and hybrid methods |
| Time tracking | Yes, in the app and from calendar appointments | Yes, effort and time tracking |
| Reporting and controlling | Yes, dashboards, reporting and analytics | Yes, real-time status, costs, budgets, KPIs and profitability |
| AI features | stated Yes | No |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS), Browser-based | more entries Cloud (SaaS), Browser-based, On-premise |
| Support | more entries Email helpdesk, Chat, Phone | Email helpdesk, Phone |
| Onboarding | Guided onboarding | more entries Live online demos and webinars, Personal consulting |
| Company size | Freelancers, Small and mid-sized | Small and mid-sized, Enterprise |
| Integrations | Slack, Salesforce, Google Sheets, MOCO, sevdesk, Lexware Office, easybill, bexio, Xero, API | more entries Jira, Confluence, Microsoft 365, Exchange, SharePoint, Microsoft Teams, Microsoft Entra, Dynamics 365 Business Central, SAP, DATEV, Subversion, Eclipse BIRT |
Adds a column to the table, from the tools in this category.
Row where the values differ The small markers point at the lower number, the longer list or the stated feature. They describe the data, they are not a verdict.
The short version
Every line is one datapoint from the table above, picked automatically. Nothing here is written text.
The trade-offs
awork
Strengths
Limitations
Projektron BCS
Strengths
Limitations
Plans
awork
Projektron BCS
What users say
awork
No reviews yet. Be the first to review this tool. Every review is checked for fairness before it appears, and the vendor cannot have one removed.
Projektron BCS
No reviews yet. Be the first to review this tool. Every review is checked for fairness before it appears, and the vendor cannot have one removed.
Where this comes from
awork https://www.awork.com · checked against the official source on 2026-08-14
Projektron BCS https://www.projektron.de · checked against the official source on 2026-08-14
This table lists factual criteria taken from information the vendors publish themselves. For how we put it together, see the methodology.