Best for
Best for agencies and service teams that want strong project management, time tracking and resource planning with EU/German hosting, without built-in invoicing.
- Freelancers
- Small and mid-sized
No tools match
Press / to search, arrow keys to move, Enter to open
Resource Planning Comparison
At a glance
Best for
Best for agencies and service teams that want strong project management, time tracking and resource planning with EU/German hosting, without built-in invoicing.
Best for
Best for large project-driven organizations that need enterprise resource planning on their own infrastructure.
Cataleo does not name a winner. Both statements come from the vendors themselves.
| Criterion | awork | Saviom |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | From €5 / user / month Billed annually. | Not stated |
| Free trial | 14 days | 4 to 6 weeks, with walkthroughs throughout |
| Users | Not stated | Licensed per user: Power licences for full system access, Lite licences for view-only access |
| Languages | German, English | Not stated |
| Hosting | EU (Germany, Frankfurt), ISO/IEC 27001 certified, GDPR-compliant | Not a SaaS product; hosted on the customer's own company server or on a cloud server of their choice |
| Made in | Germany (Hamburg) | Not stated |
| Resource planning | Yes, resource and capacity planning | Yes, scheduling and allocation by skill, role fit and availability, capacity against demand, forecasting and utilization tracking |
| Task planning | Yes, kanban, lists and timeline/Gantt | Yes, demand intake and evaluation workflows at portfolio level, with work assigned by skill, priority and availability |
| Time tracking | Yes, in the app and from calendar appointments | Yes, time tracked against project, task and allocation, with a configurable approval workflow and item-level approval or rejection |
| Reporting and controlling | Yes, dashboards, reporting and analytics | Yes, real-time dashboards, utilization and financial reporting, and business intelligence on individual productivity and cost |
| AI features | stated Yes | No |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS), Browser-based | On-premise, Browser-based |
| Support | more entries Email helpdesk, Chat, Phone | Email helpdesk, Phone |
| Onboarding | Guided onboarding | Guided onboarding |
| Company size | more entries Freelancers, Small and mid-sized | Enterprise |
| Integrations | Slack, Salesforce, Google Sheets, MOCO, sevdesk, Lexware Office, easybill, bexio, Xero, API | Not stated |
Adds a column to the table, from the tools in this category.
Row where the values differ The small markers point at the lower number, the longer list or the stated feature. They describe the data, they are not a verdict.
The short version
Every line is one datapoint from the table above, picked automatically. Nothing here is written text.
The trade-offs
awork
Strengths
Limitations
Saviom
Strengths
Limitations
Plans
awork
Saviom
What users say
awork
No reviews yet. Be the first to review this tool. Every review is checked for fairness before it appears, and the vendor cannot have one removed.
Saviom
No reviews yet. Be the first to review this tool. Every review is checked for fairness before it appears, and the vendor cannot have one removed.
Where this comes from
awork https://www.awork.com · checked against the official source on 2026-08-14
Saviom https://www.saviom.com · no check date recorded yet
This table lists factual criteria taken from information the vendors publish themselves. For how we put it together, see the methodology.