CataleoSoftware Get Your Software Listed Get Listed

Resource Planning Comparison

EG Silverbucket vs. Float

At a glance

At a glance

EG Silverbucket

Best for

Best for engineering, architecture and consulting firms that want capacity planning, project tasks and timesheets in one system.

  • Small and mid-sized
  • Enterprise

Float

Best for

Best for agencies and teams whose main need is clear capacity planning and utilization.

  • Small and mid-sized
  • Enterprise

Cataleo does not name a winner. Both statements come from the vendors themselves.

Full Comparison

Criterion EG Silverbucket Float
Starting price Quote-based Priced on the number of active people in the resourcing pool rather than on logins or feature tiers, with archived users free of charge; the subscription includes all features, while integration, maintenance and training are bought on demand. No amounts are published. Starter from ~$7 / scheduled person / month Billed annually. Pro ~$12 per scheduled person and month, Enterprise on request.
Free trial 30 days, full access, no credit card required 30-day trial
Users EG cites over 40,000 users Not stated
API Yes, an API for people, projects, customers and actual hours, plus bulk CSV and XLSX imports and single sign-on Not stated
Made in Finland (Silverbucket, Tampere, part of the Danish EG group since 2021) Australia
Resource planning Yes, drag-to-select percentage allocation to named people or role placeholders, structured resourcing requests with best-match candidate comparison, tentative allocations for modelling unconfirmed bids, competency tracking and a portfolio overview Yes, drag-and-drop scheduling with capacity forecasting, utilization tracking and PTO planning
Task planning Yes, tasks within each project on an interactive Gantt timeline, with milestones at both project and programme level Yes, with drag-and-drop task scheduling
Time tracking Yes, built-in timesheets with comments per entry and locking after a defined period; logged hours update allocation actuals directly, and an existing time registration tool can be integrated instead Yes, built in, with pre-filled timesheets
Reporting and controlling Yes, forecast and actual reports on utilisation, income, hour budgets and invoicing, a performance dashboard for billability, fee recovery and margins, a custom export builder to PDF or Excel, a filtered activity feed and a Power BI connection Yes, utilization and project budgets with margin tracking
AI features stated Yes No
MCP-ready stated Yes No
Deployment Cloud (SaaS), Browser-based Cloud (SaaS), Browser-based
Support Email helpdesk, Phone Not stated
Onboarding Documentation and knowledge base, Personal consulting Not stated
Company size Small and mid-sized, Enterprise Small and mid-sized, Enterprise
Integrations Power BI, Microsoft Excel more entries Jira, Asana, Slack, Google Calendar, Trello

Compare more tools

Row where the values differ The small markers point at the lower number, the longer list or the stated feature. They describe the data, they are not a verdict.

The short version

Key Differences

  • Starting price EG Silverbucket Quote-based Float Starter from ~$7 / scheduled person / month
  • Free trial EG Silverbucket 30 days, full access, no credit card required Float 30-day trial
  • Made in EG Silverbucket Finland (Silverbucket, Tampere, part of the Danish EG group since 2021) Float Australia
  • AI features EG Silverbucket Yes Float No
  • MCP-ready EG Silverbucket Yes Float No

Every line is one datapoint from the table above, picked automatically. Nothing here is written text.

The trade-offs

Strengths and Limitations

EG Silverbucket

Strengths

  • Planning, tasks and timesheets sit in one system, so actual hours update allocations without an export or reconciliation
  • Tentative allocations model several unconfirmed projects at once and convert to confirmed in a single click
  • An MCP server over HTTP lets an AI client read and write projects, allocations, actuals and capacity
  • 30 day free trial with full access and no credit card

Limitations

  • No published amounts, so the per-person price comes from sales
  • Parts of the AI assistant are dated to the second half of 2026, and the product pages do not agree on what is available now
  • The bill scales with the number of people planned, which suits a stable pool better than a fast-growing one

Float

Strengths

  • Intuitive drag-and-drop scheduling
  • Capacity forecasting and utilization
  • Built-in time tracking and budgets

Limitations

  • Scheduling-first, lighter financials than a full PSA
  • No native invoicing

Plans

Pricing

EG Silverbucket

  • Free trial $0 30 days, full access to all features, no credit card required.
  • Subscription Not stated Priced per active person in the resourcing pool, with archived users free and all features included. Integration, maintenance and training are available on demand. EG publishes no amounts.
Visit site

Float

  • Starter ~$7 Per scheduled person and month, billed annually.
  • Pro ~$12 Per scheduled person and month, billed annually.
  • Enterprise Custom On request.
Visit site

What users say

Review Scores · opens after launch

EG Silverbucket

Ease of use
Not rated yet
User interface
Not rated yet
Onboarding
Not rated yet
Support and service
Not rated yet
Value for money
Not rated yet
Features
Not rated yet

No reviews yet. Be the first to review this tool. Every review is checked for fairness before it appears, and the vendor cannot have one removed.

Float

Ease of use
Not rated yet
User interface
Not rated yet
Onboarding
Not rated yet
Support and service
Not rated yet
Value for money
Not rated yet
Features
Not rated yet

No reviews yet. Be the first to review this tool. Every review is checked for fairness before it appears, and the vendor cannot have one removed.

Where this comes from

Where this comes from

EG Silverbucket https://www.silverbucket.com · checked against the official source on 2026-09-11

Float https://www.float.com · no check date recorded yet

This table lists factual criteria taken from information the vendors publish themselves. For how we put it together, see the methodology.