Best for
Best for engineering, architecture and consulting firms that want capacity planning, project tasks and timesheets in one system.
- Small and mid-sized
- Enterprise
No tools match
Press / to search, arrow keys to move, Enter to open
Resource Planning Comparison
At a glance
Best for
Best for engineering, architecture and consulting firms that want capacity planning, project tasks and timesheets in one system.
Best for
Best for agencies and teams whose main need is clear capacity planning and utilization.
Cataleo does not name a winner. Both statements come from the vendors themselves.
| Criterion | EG Silverbucket | Float |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Quote-based Priced on the number of active people in the resourcing pool rather than on logins or feature tiers, with archived users free of charge; the subscription includes all features, while integration, maintenance and training are bought on demand. No amounts are published. | Starter from ~$7 / scheduled person / month Billed annually. Pro ~$12 per scheduled person and month, Enterprise on request. |
| Free trial | 30 days, full access, no credit card required | 30-day trial |
| Users | EG cites over 40,000 users | Not stated |
| API | Yes, an API for people, projects, customers and actual hours, plus bulk CSV and XLSX imports and single sign-on | Not stated |
| Made in | Finland (Silverbucket, Tampere, part of the Danish EG group since 2021) | Australia |
| Resource planning | Yes, drag-to-select percentage allocation to named people or role placeholders, structured resourcing requests with best-match candidate comparison, tentative allocations for modelling unconfirmed bids, competency tracking and a portfolio overview | Yes, drag-and-drop scheduling with capacity forecasting, utilization tracking and PTO planning |
| Task planning | Yes, tasks within each project on an interactive Gantt timeline, with milestones at both project and programme level | Yes, with drag-and-drop task scheduling |
| Time tracking | Yes, built-in timesheets with comments per entry and locking after a defined period; logged hours update allocation actuals directly, and an existing time registration tool can be integrated instead | Yes, built in, with pre-filled timesheets |
| Reporting and controlling | Yes, forecast and actual reports on utilisation, income, hour budgets and invoicing, a performance dashboard for billability, fee recovery and margins, a custom export builder to PDF or Excel, a filtered activity feed and a Power BI connection | Yes, utilization and project budgets with margin tracking |
| AI features | stated Yes | No |
| MCP-ready | stated Yes | No |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS), Browser-based | Cloud (SaaS), Browser-based |
| Support | Email helpdesk, Phone | Not stated |
| Onboarding | Documentation and knowledge base, Personal consulting | Not stated |
| Company size | Small and mid-sized, Enterprise | Small and mid-sized, Enterprise |
| Integrations | Power BI, Microsoft Excel | more entries Jira, Asana, Slack, Google Calendar, Trello |
Adds a column to the table, from the tools in this category.
Row where the values differ The small markers point at the lower number, the longer list or the stated feature. They describe the data, they are not a verdict.
The short version
Every line is one datapoint from the table above, picked automatically. Nothing here is written text.
The trade-offs
EG Silverbucket
Strengths
Limitations
Float
Strengths
Limitations
Plans
EG Silverbucket
Float
What users say
EG Silverbucket
No reviews yet. Be the first to review this tool. Every review is checked for fairness before it appears, and the vendor cannot have one removed.
Float
No reviews yet. Be the first to review this tool. Every review is checked for fairness before it appears, and the vendor cannot have one removed.
Where this comes from
EG Silverbucket https://www.silverbucket.com · checked against the official source on 2026-09-11
Float https://www.float.com · no check date recorded yet
This table lists factual criteria taken from information the vendors publish themselves. For how we put it together, see the methodology.