Best for
Best for engineering, defence and manufacturing organisations running many projects against one shared pool of specialists, where priorities have to be settled across the portfolio rather than inside a single plan.
- Enterprise
No tools match
Press / to search, arrow keys to move, Enter to open
Resource Planning Comparison
At a glance
Best for
Best for engineering, defence and manufacturing organisations running many projects against one shared pool of specialists, where priorities have to be settled across the portfolio rather than inside a single plan.
Best for
Best for small creative and technical teams that want scheduling, time tracking and leave in one lightweight tool.
Cataleo does not name a winner. Both statements come from the vendors themselves.
| Criterion | Epicflow | Teamdeck |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | From €22.50 / person / month Growth plan billed annually, €25 per person per month on monthly billing. Growth covers 20 to 50 users, up to 50 projects and a maximum of 250 tasks; licences are annual with monthly payment available. | From $2 / member / month Standard plan, billed monthly. Light members $2, full members $6 per month; 10% off billed yearly. |
| Free trial | Free 30-day trial with unlimited user access, including a weekly 30-minute support call | 14-day trial |
| Hosting | Cloud, with a DataGuard option that keeps company data on the customer's own premises | Not stated |
| Made in | Netherlands (Glow Management Nederland BV, Amsterdam) | Not stated |
| Resource planning | Yes, resource groups and competence-based allocation with capacity planning, a Historical Load Graph of past utilisation, a Future Load Graph projecting demand, and what-if simulation of a change before it is committed | Yes, resource scheduling with capacity and availability planning |
| Task planning | Yes, a pipeline view across projects and a Gantt chart with dependencies, with task priority recalculated automatically across the whole portfolio rather than per project | Yes, bookings and project scheduling |
| Time tracking | Yes, timesheets that record what teams delivered over time and set it against the original estimates | Yes, time tracking with timesheets, plus leave and PTO management |
| Reporting and controlling | Yes, real-time dashboards on project health, burn-up charts of completed against remaining work, progress analysis and generated basic and advanced reports | Yes, custom reporting |
| AI features | stated Yes | No |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS), Browser-based | Cloud (SaaS), Browser-based |
| Support | Email helpdesk, Phone | Not stated |
| Onboarding | more entries Guided onboarding, Live online demos and webinars, Personal consulting | Documentation and knowledge base, Video tutorials |
| Company size | Enterprise | more entries Small and mid-sized, Enterprise |
| Integrations | Microsoft Project, Microsoft Project Server, Jira, Oracle Primavera, SAP | Google Calendar, Outlook Calendar, Slack, Podio, Sage HR |
Adds a column to the table, from the tools in this category.
Row where the values differ The small markers point at the lower number, the longer list or the stated feature. They describe the data, they are not a verdict.
The short version
Every line is one datapoint from the table above, picked automatically. Nothing here is written text.
The trade-offs
Epicflow
Strengths
Limitations
Teamdeck
Strengths
Limitations
Plans
Epicflow
Teamdeck
What users say
Epicflow
No reviews yet. Be the first to review this tool. Every review is checked for fairness before it appears, and the vendor cannot have one removed.
Teamdeck
No reviews yet. Be the first to review this tool. Every review is checked for fairness before it appears, and the vendor cannot have one removed.
Where this comes from
Epicflow https://www.epicflow.com · no check date recorded yet
Teamdeck https://teamdeck.io · no check date recorded yet
This table lists factual criteria taken from information the vendors publish themselves. For how we put it together, see the methodology.