Best for
Best for agencies and teams whose main need is clear capacity planning and utilization.
- Small and mid-sized
- Enterprise
No tools match
Press / to search, arrow keys to move, Enter to open
Resource Planning Comparison
At a glance
Best for
Best for agencies and teams whose main need is clear capacity planning and utilization.
Best for
Best for enterprise PMOs that want portfolio intake, delivery, capacity and project financials answered by one system.
Cataleo does not name a winner. Both statements come from the vendors themselves.
| Criterion | Float | Planview AdaptiveWork |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Starter from ~$7 / scheduled person / month Billed annually. Pro ~$12 per scheduled person and month, Enterprise on request. | Quote-based Planview publishes no prices for AdaptiveWork; every quote comes from sales. |
| Free trial | 30-day trial | Demo on request; Planview lists self-service trials only for AgilePlace and ProjectPlace, not for AdaptiveWork |
| API | Not stated | Yes, documented REST API with separate EU and US endpoints |
| Hosting | Not stated | Cloud, delivered as SaaS with web and mobile apps |
| Made in | Australia | United States (Planview, Austin, Texas) |
| Resource planning | Yes, drag-and-drop scheduling with capacity forecasting, utilization tracking and PTO planning | Yes, real-time capacity against current workload, analysis of over- and under-allocated people, and what-if modelling of resource decisions |
| Task planning | Yes, with drag-and-drop task scheduling | Yes, Gantt charts and work breakdown structures, with waterfall, agile and hybrid delivery in the same system |
| Time tracking | Yes, built in, with pre-filled timesheets | Yes, billable and non-billable hours and expenses booked to the work item or project, with an approval workflow |
| Reporting and controlling | Yes, utilization and project budgets with margin tracking | Yes, configurable reports and dashboards, plus financial management covering budgets, cost and revenue forecasting |
| AI features | No | stated Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS), Browser-based | Cloud (SaaS), Browser-based |
| Support | Not stated | Email helpdesk, Community forum |
| Onboarding | Not stated | Documentation and knowledge base |
| Company size | more entries Small and mid-sized, Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Integrations | Jira, Asana, Slack, Google Calendar, Trello | more entries Jira, Salesforce, ServiceNow, Microsoft SharePoint, Microsoft Teams, Microsoft Excel, Slack, Box, Google Workspace, SAP, Oracle NetSuite, Oracle E-Business Suite, Zendesk, Tableau, Procore, Ziflow, Gainsight, Zapier |
Adds a column to the table, from the tools in this category.
Row where the values differ The small markers point at the lower number, the longer list or the stated feature. They describe the data, they are not a verdict.
The short version
Every line is one datapoint from the table above, picked automatically. Nothing here is written text.
The trade-offs
Float
Strengths
Limitations
Planview AdaptiveWork
Strengths
Limitations
Plans
Float
Planview AdaptiveWork
What users say
Float
No reviews yet. Be the first to review this tool. Every review is checked for fairness before it appears, and the vendor cannot have one removed.
Planview AdaptiveWork
No reviews yet. Be the first to review this tool. Every review is checked for fairness before it appears, and the vendor cannot have one removed.
Where this comes from
Float https://www.float.com · no check date recorded yet
Planview AdaptiveWork https://www.planview.com/products-solutions/products/adaptivework/ · no check date recorded yet
This table lists factual criteria taken from information the vendors publish themselves. For how we put it together, see the methodology.