Best for
Best for agencies and service teams that want strong project management, time tracking and resource planning with EU/German hosting, without built-in invoicing.
- Freelancers
- Small and mid-sized
No tools match
Press / to search, arrow keys to move, Enter to open
Agency Software Comparison
At a glance
Best for
Best for agencies and service teams that want strong project management, time tracking and resource planning with EU/German hosting, without built-in invoicing.
Best for
Best for agencies and professional-services firms that want budgeting, resource planning, time tracking and invoicing in one platform.
Cataleo does not name a winner. Both statements come from the vendors themselves.
| Criterion | awork | Productive |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | From €5 / user / month Billed annually. | From $9 / user / month Essential plan, per user and month billed annually. Pricing starts at 10 users. Prices are in US dollars. |
| Free trial | 14 days | 14-day free trial, no credit card required |
| API | Not stated | Yes, API access from the Essential plan |
| Languages | German, English | Not stated |
| Hosting | EU (Germany, Frankfurt), ISO/IEC 27001 certified, GDPR-compliant | Cloud (SaaS) |
| Made in | Germany (Hamburg) | Not stated |
| Time tracking | Yes, in the app and from calendar appointments | Yes, manual, timer and automatic time tracking with billable-time approvals |
| Project costing | Yes, time-based project budgets calculated from stored hourly rates, with retainer budgets and tracked-versus-planned comparison | Yes, budgets, expense management, rate cards and revenue recognition |
| Invoicing | No built-in invoicing or accounting, available through integrations | Yes, create and send invoices with tax settings and credit notes |
| Resource planning | Yes, resource and capacity planning | Yes, bookings, availability and utilisation planning |
| Reporting and controlling | Yes, dashboards, reporting and analytics | Yes, 50+ report templates and dashboards, with revenue forecasting on Ultimate |
| Integrations and API | Yes, API | Yes, API access from the Essential plan; webhooks on Ultimate |
| AI features | Yes | Yes |
| MCP-ready | No | stated Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS), Browser-based | Cloud (SaaS), Browser-based |
| Support | more entries Email helpdesk, Chat, Phone | Chat |
| Onboarding | Guided onboarding | more entries Documentation and knowledge base, Video tutorials, Live online demos and webinars |
| Company size | Freelancers, Small and mid-sized | Small and mid-sized, Enterprise |
| Integrations | Slack, Salesforce, Google Sheets, MOCO, sevdesk, Lexware Office, easybill, bexio, Xero, API | more entries Jira, HubSpot, Slack, Gmail, Microsoft Outlook, Google Calendar, Xero, QuickBooks, Sage, Fortnox, Visma e-conomic, Exact, Twinfield, NetSuite, BambooHR, Personio, HiBob, Rippling, Factorial, CharlieHR, Breathe, Humaans.io, Justworks, BugHerd, Memtime, Zapier |
Adds a column to the table, from the tools in this category.
Row where the values differ The small markers point at the lower number, the longer list or the stated feature. They describe the data, they are not a verdict.
The short version
Every line is one datapoint from the table above, picked automatically. Nothing here is written text.
The trade-offs
awork
Strengths
Limitations
Productive
Strengths
Limitations
Plans
awork
Productive
What users say
awork
No reviews yet. Be the first to review this tool. Every review is checked for fairness before it appears, and the vendor cannot have one removed.
Productive
No reviews yet. Be the first to review this tool. Every review is checked for fairness before it appears, and the vendor cannot have one removed.
Where this comes from
awork https://www.awork.com · checked against the official source on 2026-08-14
Productive https://productive.io · checked against the official source on 2026-08-20
This table lists factual criteria taken from information the vendors publish themselves. For how we put it together, see the methodology.