Best for
Best for engineering teams that want an agentic assistant with deep, large-codebase context across the IDE and terminal.
- Small and mid-sized
- Enterprise
No tools match
Press / to search, arrow keys to move, Enter to open
AI Code Comparison
At a glance
Best for
Best for engineering teams that want an agentic assistant with deep, large-codebase context across the IDE and terminal.
Best for
Best for developers who want an open-source agent and want to pay for model calls at cost.
Cataleo does not name a winner. Both statements come from the vendors themselves.
| Criterion | Augment Code | Kilo Code |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Standard $20 / month Flat rate for teams up to 50 seats, including $20 of usage across models, context engine and compute; top-ups are pay-as-you-go. Business is $100 per month on the same terms, Enterprise is custom. | lower value Free and open source; Teams $15 / user / month Inference is billed separately: exact provider rates through the Kilo Gateway with no markup, your own keys, or an optional Kilo Pass credit subscription at $19, $49 or $199 a month. Enterprise is quoted. Cloud compute is billed per second, Gas Town at $1.20 an hour and code review at $0.33. |
| Free trial | Not stated | Free plan for individuals; a 14-day Enterprise trial for teams |
| Commercial use | Yes | Yes, the source is MIT licensed |
| Output | Agentic coding across the IDE and terminal | Code, refactors, pull-request reviews and agent sessions |
| API | Yes, the Auggie SDK for TypeScript/Node.js and Python, plus an Analytics API | Yes, the Kilo Gateway is a single endpoint to hundreds of models, with streaming, BYOK and usage tracking |
| Hosting | Not stated | Cloud (SaaS), with editor extensions and a CLI on your own machine |
| Where it runs | Extensions for VS Code and JetBrains IDEs, plus the Auggie CLI in the terminal | VS Code extension, JetBrains plugin for IntelliJ, PyCharm, WebStorm and others, a CLI installed with npm, cloud agents, Slack and mobile apps |
| Inline completions | Tab-accepted inline completions in VS Code and JetBrains, with word-by-word acceptance; deprecated for non-Enterprise plans on 31 March 2026 and retained on Enterprise | Yes, fill-in-the-middle autocomplete routed through the Kilo Gateway, on by default as ghost text accepted with Tab, using Codestral by default or Mercury Edit 2 with your own Inception key; a status bar item snoozes it |
| Agent mode | Yes, the Cosmos coding agent with a codebase context engine, in the IDE and CLI | Yes, Code, Architect, Debug, Ask and custom modes, an automated pull-request code reviewer, and an Agent Manager running parallel worktree-isolated local and cloud sessions |
| Model choice | Yes, Claude (Sonnet and Opus) and Gemini 2.5 Pro, with a Prism router that balances cost and quality | Yes, more than 500 models across over 60 providers through the Kilo Gateway, Auto Model routing across Frontier, Efficient and Free tiers, your own Anthropic, OpenAI, Google, Azure or AWS Bedrock keys, and local models with Ollama or LM Studio |
| Data control | SOC 2 Type II; Enterprise adds CMEK, ISO 42001 and SIEM integration | MIT-licensed source with the prompt and context window open to inspection and no silent model switching; Teams adds data privacy controls and shared BYOK, Enterprise adds SSO, OIDC and SCIM, audit logs and limits on which models and providers may be used |
| Ecosystem fit | MCP and native tool integrations; agents for code review, test coverage and ticket-to-PR workflows | MCP servers, GitHub integration for automated pull-request reviews, plugins, shell integration, custom rules and shared agent modes |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS), Browser-based | Cloud (SaaS), Browser-based |
| Support | more entries Email helpdesk, Community forum | Community forum |
| Onboarding | Documentation and knowledge base | Documentation and knowledge base |
| Company size | Small and mid-sized, Enterprise | more entries Freelancers, Small and mid-sized, Enterprise |
| Integrations | more entries Visual Studio Code, JetBrains IDEs, GitHub, GitLab, Jira, Linear, Slack, Confluence, Notion, Sentry, Stripe | GitHub, Slack, Ollama, LM Studio |
Adds a column to the table, from the tools in this category.
Row where the values differ The small markers point at the lower number, the longer list or the stated feature. They describe the data, they are not a verdict.
The short version
Every line is one datapoint from the table above, picked automatically. Nothing here is written text.
The trade-offs
Augment Code
Strengths
Limitations
Kilo Code
Strengths
Limitations
Plans
Augment Code
Kilo Code
What users say
Augment Code
No reviews yet. Be the first to review this tool. Every review is checked for fairness before it appears, and the vendor cannot have one removed.
Kilo Code
No reviews yet. Be the first to review this tool. Every review is checked for fairness before it appears, and the vendor cannot have one removed.
Where this comes from
Augment Code https://www.augmentcode.com/ · no check date recorded yet
Kilo Code https://kilo.ai · checked against the official source on 2026-09-10
This table lists factual criteria taken from information the vendors publish themselves. For how we put it together, see the methodology.