Best for
Best for software and web teams that want issues, documentation and their Git or Subversion repositories in one tool without paying per seat.
- Small and mid-sized
- Enterprise
No tools match
Press / to search, arrow keys to move, Enter to open
Project Management Comparison
At a glance
Best for
Best for software and web teams that want issues, documentation and their Git or Subversion repositories in one tool without paying per seat.
Best for
Best for mid-sized to large service providers that need project management and ERP in one method-independent system, with a cloud or on-premise choice.
Cataleo does not name a winner. Both statements come from the vendors themselves.
| Criterion | Backlog | Projektron BCS |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free plan; Starter $35 / month Charged per plan, not per user: Starter $35 a month for 30 users and 5 projects, Standard $100 for unlimited users and 100 projects, Premium $175 for unlimited projects. Paying yearly saves 17 percent. Enterprise is quoted. | From 20 Euro / licence / month BCS.light in the cloud, per licence and month, six-month minimum term. As a one-off on-premise purchase BCS.light costs 200 Euro per licence with no minimum term. Full BCS costs 300 to 350 Euro per user as an on-premise purchase, or 5 percent of that purchase price per user and month in the cloud; the exact figure depends on the range of functions. All prices exclusive of VAT. |
| Free trial | 30-day free trial with no credit card required, alongside a free plan for 10 users and 1 project | Demo via web conference |
| Users | 10 on the free plan, 30 on Starter, unlimited from Standard upward, with no per-user fee | Not stated |
| API | Yes, a REST API under /api/v2 with a documented rate limit | Not stated |
| Languages | English and Japanese | Available in 7-8 languages |
| Hosting | Cloud (SaaS); the Enterprise plan can be installed on a private server | Cloud (Germany) or on-premise |
| Made in | Japan | Germany (Berlin) |
| Task planning | Yes, issues with parent tasks and subtasks, three levels deep on Premium, on a drag-and-drop Kanban board, Gantt charts mapping dependencies and deadlines, milestones, burndown charts, custom fields and reusable templates | Yes, project and multi-project management supporting IPMA, PMI, PRINCE2, Scrum, Kanban, Hermes and hybrid methods |
| Resource planning | Limited, with no dedicated capacity or workload module. The Gantt chart can be grouped by assignee, which lays out each person's scheduled issues on their own rows, and each issue carries estimated hours; the Gantt chart starts on the Standard plan | Yes, resource management and planning |
| Time tracking | Estimated and actual hours are fields on the issue itself and are carried by the API as estimatedHours and actualHours. There is no separate timer or timesheet product | Yes, effort and time tracking |
| Reporting and controlling | Yes, a dashboard giving a real-time overview of projects, tasks and updates, burndown charts for sprint pace and Gantt charts for the schedule; Gantt and burndown start on the Standard plan | Yes, real-time status, costs, budgets, KPIs and profitability |
| Integrations and API | Yes, a REST API under /api/v2 with a documented rate limit, plus integrations with Slack, Microsoft Teams, Google Chat, Jenkins, Cacoo and LambdaTest and importers from Jira and Redmine | Yes, API and standard interfaces |
| AI features | stated Yes | No |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS), Browser-based, On-premise | Cloud (SaaS), Browser-based, On-premise |
| Support | Email helpdesk, Community forum | Email helpdesk, Phone |
| Onboarding | Documentation and knowledge base | more entries Live online demos and webinars, Personal consulting |
| Company size | Small and mid-sized, Enterprise | Small and mid-sized, Enterprise |
| Integrations | Slack, Microsoft Teams, Google Chat, Jenkins, Cacoo, LambdaTest, Jira, Redmine, Google Drive, Dropbox, OneDrive | more entries Jira, Confluence, Microsoft 365, Exchange, SharePoint, Microsoft Teams, Microsoft Entra, Dynamics 365 Business Central, SAP, DATEV, Subversion, Eclipse BIRT |
Adds a column to the table, from the tools in this category.
Row where the values differ The small markers point at the lower number, the longer list or the stated feature. They describe the data, they are not a verdict.
The short version
Every line is one datapoint from the table above, picked automatically. Nothing here is written text.
The trade-offs
Backlog
Strengths
Limitations
Projektron BCS
Strengths
Limitations
Plans
Backlog
Projektron BCS
What users say
Backlog
No reviews yet. Nothing has been published here yet, and no score is shown. How a review is checked before it appears is described below.
Projektron BCS
No reviews yet. Nothing has been published here yet, and no score is shown. How a review is checked before it appears is described below.
Reviews are not published yet. The form on a tool's page works and reaches us, but nothing from it appears on this site, so no score here is based on a review. The rules below are the ones that will apply once reviews go live.
Every review is read by a person before it appears. We require a working email address and use it to come back to the author, so a review has a reachable sender rather than being anonymous. We publish positive and negative reviews alike, we pay nothing and offer nothing for a review, and we accept none that was bought or incentivised.
What we cannot do is verify a purchase. There is no shop here and no account, so whether the author really used the tool rests on what they tell us, plus the plausibility of what they write. We say so rather than implying a check that does not exist.
A vendor cannot have a review removed, cannot buy one, and cannot have one changed. Paid placement and a paid listing have no effect on which reviews appear or on any score.
Where this comes from
Backlog https://nulab.com/backlog/ · checked against the official source on 2026-09-22
Projektron BCS https://www.projektron.de · checked against the official source on 2026-08-14
This table lists factual criteria taken from information the vendors publish themselves. For how we put it together, see the methodology.