Best for
Best for organisations on Microsoft 365 that want team task planning inside Teams without buying a separate tool.
- Small and mid-sized
- Enterprise
No tools match
Press / to search, arrow keys to move, Enter to open
Project Management Comparison
At a glance
Best for
Best for organisations on Microsoft 365 that want team task planning inside Teams without buying a separate tool.
Best for
Best for teams whose processes do not fit a ready-made project tool and who want to model them themselves without code.
Cataleo does not name a winner. Both statements come from the vendors themselves.
| Criterion | Microsoft Planner | Podio |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | lower value From $10 / user / month Planner Plan 1, paid yearly on an annual subscription that auto-renews. Planner and Project Plan 3 is $30. A basic Planner is included in Microsoft 365 subscriptions; the Microsoft 365 Copilot add-on is $30 per user and month, paid yearly. | Free plan; Plus from $11.20 / user / month Plus billed annually, $14 billed monthly. Premium $19.20 per user and month annually, $24 monthly. Prices exclude taxes. Extra API capacity and workflow automation are paid add-ons on paid plans. |
| Free trial | One-month free trial of Plan 1 and Plan 3; credit card required | Free plan for up to five users and 100 items; 30-day free trial of Premium |
| Output | Task plans, sprints, timelines, portfolios and progress charts | Not stated |
| API | Not stated | Yes, an open API with 1,000 calls per hour on every plan, more through paid add-ons |
| Hosting | Cloud, as a web app and inside Microsoft Teams; Plan 3 adds the Project desktop app on up to 5 PCs per user | Cloud (SaaS), with web and mobile apps for iOS and Android |
| Task planning | Yes. Grid, Board, Schedule and Charts views with checklists, labels and custom templates in every version; Plan 1 adds sub-tasks, backlogs and sprints, milestones, finish-to-start dependencies and the Timeline (Gantt) view; Plan 3 adds baselines, critical path and dependencies with lead and lag | Yes, task management plus custom apps and workspaces for projects and deliverables; a Gantt view is built with workflow automation or a community extension |
| Resource planning | Yes, from Plan 1: a People view for resource allocation and workload balancing, plus effort and duration per task. Plan 3 adds an Assignments view that defines effort per resource. The version included in Microsoft 365 has neither | No dedicated resource planning or capacity view; tasks are assigned to individual team members, and resource scheduling comes through the third-party Teamdeck extension |
| Time tracking | No. The plan comparison lists no timesheets or time logging, only effort and duration estimates per task | Not built in; time tracking is offered through community extensions |
| Reporting and controlling | Charts view in every version; prebuilt and custom dashboards and reports are view-only in the included version and fully available from Plan 1, along with goals linked to tasks. AI status reports need Microsoft 365 Copilot | Yes, visual reports and personalised dashboards on Plus and Premium |
| Integrations and API | Yes. Power Automate in every version (cloud flows only in the included one), APIs to customise the experience from Plan 1, and built-in use from Teams, Outlook and Loop | Yes, an open API at 1,000 calls per hour on every plan with paid add-ons for more, webforms, and native connections to ShareFile, Dropbox, Google Drive and Excel |
| AI features | stated Yes | No |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS), Browser-based | Cloud (SaaS), Browser-based |
| Support | Community forum | Chat |
| Onboarding | Documentation and knowledge base | Documentation and knowledge base |
| Company size | more entries Small and mid-sized, Enterprise | Small and mid-sized |
| Integrations | Microsoft Teams, Microsoft Outlook, Microsoft Loop, Microsoft 365 Copilot, Power Automate, Microsoft Project | more entries ShareFile, Dropbox, Google Drive, Excel, GoToMeeting, Zapier, Teamdeck |
Adds a column to the table, from the tools in this category.
Row where the values differ The small markers point at the lower number, the longer list or the stated feature. They describe the data, they are not a verdict.
The short version
Every line is one datapoint from the table above, picked automatically. Nothing here is written text.
The trade-offs
Microsoft Planner
Strengths
Limitations
Podio
Strengths
Limitations
Plans
Microsoft Planner
Podio
What users say
Microsoft Planner
No reviews yet. Nothing has been published here yet, and no score is shown. How a review is checked before it appears is described below.
Podio
No reviews yet. Nothing has been published here yet, and no score is shown. How a review is checked before it appears is described below.
Reviews are not published yet. The form on a tool's page works and reaches us, but nothing from it appears on this site, so no score here is based on a review. The rules below are the ones that will apply once reviews go live.
Every review is read by a person before it appears. We require a working email address and use it to come back to the author, so a review has a reachable sender rather than being anonymous. We publish positive and negative reviews alike, we pay nothing and offer nothing for a review, and we accept none that was bought or incentivised.
What we cannot do is verify a purchase. There is no shop here and no account, so whether the author really used the tool rests on what they tell us, plus the plausibility of what they write. We say so rather than implying a check that does not exist.
A vendor cannot have a review removed, cannot buy one, and cannot have one changed. Paid placement and a paid listing have no effect on which reviews appear or on any score.
Where this comes from
Microsoft Planner https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/planner/microsoft-planner · checked against the official source on 2026-09-30
Podio https://www.progress.com/podio · no check date recorded yet
This table lists factual criteria taken from information the vendors publish themselves. For how we put it together, see the methodology.