Best for
Best for enterprise PMOs that want portfolio intake, delivery, capacity and project financials answered by one system.
- Enterprise
No tools match
Press / to search, arrow keys to move, Enter to open
Resource Planning Comparison
At a glance
Best for
Best for enterprise PMOs that want portfolio intake, delivery, capacity and project financials answered by one system.
Best for
Best for professional-services firms that want projects, resources and finances in one PSA, from small consultancies to enterprises.
Cataleo does not name a winner. Both statements come from the vendors themselves.
| Criterion | Planview AdaptiveWork | Scoro |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Quote-based Planview publishes no prices for AdaptiveWork; every quote comes from sales. | From €15 / user / month Time-billing bundle, minimum 5 users. The price rises with the apps combined, up to €52 for the end-to-end bundle; annual billing is 13 to 17 percent cheaper. |
| Free trial | Demo on request; Planview lists self-service trials only for AgilePlace and ProjectPlace, not for AdaptiveWork | 14 days, no credit card |
| API | Yes, documented REST API with separate EU and US endpoints | Not stated |
| Languages | Not stated | English, German, Estonian, French, Spanish |
| Hosting | Cloud, delivered as SaaS with web and mobile apps | Cloud, GDPR-compliant |
| Made in | United States (Planview, Austin, Texas) | Estonia |
| Resource planning | Yes, real-time capacity against current workload, analysis of over- and under-allocated people, and what-if modelling of resource decisions | Yes, with capacity forecasting |
| Task planning | Yes, Gantt charts and work breakdown structures, with waterfall, agile and hybrid delivery in the same system | Yes, quote-to-invoice, Gantt, tasks and subtasks |
| Time tracking | Yes, billable and non-billable hours and expenses booked to the work item or project, with an approval workflow | Yes, billable and non-billable |
| Reporting and controlling | Yes, configurable reports and dashboards, plus financial management covering budgets, cost and revenue forecasting | Yes, real-time financials and profitability forecasting |
| AI features | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS), Browser-based | Cloud (SaaS), Browser-based |
| Support | Email helpdesk, Community forum | more entries Email helpdesk, Phone, Chat |
| Onboarding | Documentation and knowledge base | Personal consulting |
| Company size | Enterprise | more entries Small and mid-sized, Enterprise |
| Integrations | more entries Jira, Salesforce, ServiceNow, Microsoft SharePoint, Microsoft Teams, Microsoft Excel, Slack, Box, Google Workspace, SAP, Oracle NetSuite, Oracle E-Business Suite, Zendesk, Tableau, Procore, Ziflow, Gainsight, Zapier | Xero, QuickBooks, Sage Intacct, Exact Online, Google Calendar, Microsoft Exchange, HubSpot, Salesforce, Jira, Stripe, Expensify, Zapier |
Adds a column to the table, from the tools in this category.
Row where the values differ The small markers point at the lower number, the longer list or the stated feature. They describe the data, they are not a verdict.
The short version
Every line is one datapoint from the table above, picked automatically. Nothing here is written text.
The trade-offs
Planview AdaptiveWork
Strengths
Limitations
Scoro
Strengths
Limitations
Plans
Planview AdaptiveWork
Scoro
What users say
Planview AdaptiveWork
No reviews yet. Be the first to review this tool. Every review is checked for fairness before it appears, and the vendor cannot have one removed.
Scoro
No reviews yet. Be the first to review this tool. Every review is checked for fairness before it appears, and the vendor cannot have one removed.
Where this comes from
Planview AdaptiveWork https://www.planview.com/products-solutions/products/adaptivework/ · no check date recorded yet
Scoro https://www.scoro.com · checked against the official source on 2026-09-01
This table lists factual criteria taken from information the vendors publish themselves. For how we put it together, see the methodology.