CataleoSoftware Get Your Software Listed Get Listed

Resource Planning Comparison

Planview AdaptiveWork vs. Scoro

At a glance

At a glance

Planview AdaptiveWork

Best for

Best for enterprise PMOs that want portfolio intake, delivery, capacity and project financials answered by one system.

  • Enterprise

Scoro

Best for

Best for professional-services firms that want projects, resources and finances in one PSA, from small consultancies to enterprises.

  • Small and mid-sized
  • Enterprise

Cataleo does not name a winner. Both statements come from the vendors themselves.

Full Comparison

Criterion Planview AdaptiveWork Scoro
Starting price Quote-based Planview publishes no prices for AdaptiveWork; every quote comes from sales. From €15 / user / month Time-billing bundle, minimum 5 users. The price rises with the apps combined, up to €52 for the end-to-end bundle; annual billing is 13 to 17 percent cheaper.
Free trial Demo on request; Planview lists self-service trials only for AgilePlace and ProjectPlace, not for AdaptiveWork 14 days, no credit card
API Yes, documented REST API with separate EU and US endpoints Not stated
Languages Not stated English, German, Estonian, French, Spanish
Hosting Cloud, delivered as SaaS with web and mobile apps Cloud, GDPR-compliant
Made in United States (Planview, Austin, Texas) Estonia
Resource planning Yes, real-time capacity against current workload, analysis of over- and under-allocated people, and what-if modelling of resource decisions Yes, with capacity forecasting
Task planning Yes, Gantt charts and work breakdown structures, with waterfall, agile and hybrid delivery in the same system Yes, quote-to-invoice, Gantt, tasks and subtasks
Time tracking Yes, billable and non-billable hours and expenses booked to the work item or project, with an approval workflow Yes, billable and non-billable
Reporting and controlling Yes, configurable reports and dashboards, plus financial management covering budgets, cost and revenue forecasting Yes, real-time financials and profitability forecasting
AI features Yes Yes
Deployment Cloud (SaaS), Browser-based Cloud (SaaS), Browser-based
Support Email helpdesk, Community forum more entries Email helpdesk, Phone, Chat
Onboarding Documentation and knowledge base Personal consulting
Company size Enterprise more entries Small and mid-sized, Enterprise
Integrations more entries Jira, Salesforce, ServiceNow, Microsoft SharePoint, Microsoft Teams, Microsoft Excel, Slack, Box, Google Workspace, SAP, Oracle NetSuite, Oracle E-Business Suite, Zendesk, Tableau, Procore, Ziflow, Gainsight, Zapier Xero, QuickBooks, Sage Intacct, Exact Online, Google Calendar, Microsoft Exchange, HubSpot, Salesforce, Jira, Stripe, Expensify, Zapier

Compare more tools

Row where the values differ The small markers point at the lower number, the longer list or the stated feature. They describe the data, they are not a verdict.

The short version

Key Differences

  • Starting price Planview AdaptiveWork Quote-based Scoro From €15 / user / month
  • Free trial Planview AdaptiveWork Demo on request; Planview lists self-service trials only for AgilePlace and ProjectPlace, not for AdaptiveWork Scoro 14 days, no credit card
  • Company size Planview AdaptiveWork Enterprise Scoro Small and mid-sized, Enterprise
  • Hosting Planview AdaptiveWork Cloud, delivered as SaaS with web and mobile apps Scoro Cloud, GDPR-compliant
  • Support Planview AdaptiveWork Email helpdesk, Community forum Scoro Email helpdesk, Phone, Chat

Every line is one datapoint from the table above, picked automatically. Nothing here is written text.

The trade-offs

Strengths and Limitations

Planview AdaptiveWork

Strengths

  • Portfolio intake, project plan, resource capacity, time and project financials sit in one system rather than in separate tools
  • Waterfall, agile and hybrid delivery are supported side by side, with Jira connected for teams that stay there
  • Documented REST API plus prebuilt connections to Salesforce, ServiceNow, SAP, NetSuite and Oracle E-Business Suite

Limitations

  • No published prices, so budgeting for it takes a sales conversation
  • No self-service trial; Planview lists one for its AgilePlace and ProjectPlace products but not for AdaptiveWork

Scoro

Strengths

  • Unifies projects, resources and finances in one PSA
  • Strong profitability and financial insights
  • Connects to the main accounting, calendar and automation tools

Limitations

  • Higher price point
  • Depth can be complex for small teams

Plans

Pricing

Planview AdaptiveWork

  • Quote-based Not stated Planview publishes no price list for AdaptiveWork; quotes come from sales.
Visit site

Scoro

  • Time-billing €15 Per user and month, minimum 5 users. Combines the Track and Invoice apps.
  • Projects & Resources €25 Per user and month, minimum 5 users. Combines Do, Deliver, Track and Resource.
  • Quote to Cash €25 Per user and month, minimum 5 users. Combines Estimate, Deliver, Track and Invoice.
  • End-to-end €52 Per user and month, minimum 5 users. All eight apps plus Advanced Work and Advanced Financials. Annual billing is 13 to 17 percent cheaper on every bundle.
Visit site

What users say

Review Scores · opens after launch

Planview AdaptiveWork

Ease of use
Not rated yet
User interface
Not rated yet
Onboarding
Not rated yet
Support and service
Not rated yet
Value for money
Not rated yet
Features
Not rated yet

No reviews yet. Be the first to review this tool. Every review is checked for fairness before it appears, and the vendor cannot have one removed.

Scoro

Ease of use
Not rated yet
User interface
Not rated yet
Onboarding
Not rated yet
Support and service
Not rated yet
Value for money
Not rated yet
Features
Not rated yet

No reviews yet. Be the first to review this tool. Every review is checked for fairness before it appears, and the vendor cannot have one removed.

Where this comes from

Where this comes from

Planview AdaptiveWork https://www.planview.com/products-solutions/products/adaptivework/ · no check date recorded yet

Scoro https://www.scoro.com · checked against the official source on 2026-09-01

This table lists factual criteria taken from information the vendors publish themselves. For how we put it together, see the methodology.