Best for
Best for enterprise PMOs that want portfolio intake, delivery, capacity and project financials answered by one system.
- Enterprise
Resource Planning Comparison
Planview AdaptiveWork vs. Scoro
At a glance
At a glance
Best for
Best for professional-services firms that want projects, resources and finances in one PSA, from small consultancies to enterprises.
- Small and mid-sized
- Enterprise
Cataleo does not name a winner. Both statements come from the vendors themselves.
Full Comparison
| Criterion | Planview AdaptiveWork | Scoro |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Quote-based Planview publishes no prices for AdaptiveWork; every quote comes from sales. | From €15 / user / month Time-billing bundle, minimum 5 users. The price rises with the apps combined, up to €52 for the end-to-end bundle; annual billing is 13 to 17 percent cheaper. |
| Free trial | Demo on request; Planview lists self-service trials only for AgilePlace and ProjectPlace, not for AdaptiveWork | 14 days, no credit card |
| API | Yes, documented REST API with separate EU and US endpoints | Not stated |
| Languages | Not stated | English, German, Estonian, French, Spanish |
| Hosting | Cloud, delivered as SaaS with web and mobile apps | Cloud, GDPR-compliant |
| Made in | United States (Planview, Austin, Texas) | Estonia |
| Resource planning | Yes, real-time capacity against current workload, analysis of over- and under-allocated people, and what-if modelling of resource decisions | Yes, with capacity forecasting |
| Task planning | Yes, Gantt charts and work breakdown structures, with waterfall, agile and hybrid delivery in the same system | Yes, quote-to-invoice, Gantt, tasks and subtasks |
| Time tracking | Yes, billable and non-billable hours and expenses booked to the work item or project, with an approval workflow | Yes, billable and non-billable |
| Reporting and controlling | Yes, configurable reports and dashboards, plus financial management covering budgets, cost and revenue forecasting | Yes, real-time financials and profitability forecasting |
| AI features | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS), Browser-based | Cloud (SaaS), Browser-based |
| Support | Email helpdesk, Community forum | more entries Email helpdesk, Phone, Chat |
| Onboarding | Documentation and knowledge base | Personal consulting |
| Company size | Enterprise | more entries Small and mid-sized, Enterprise |
| Integrations | more entries Jira, Salesforce, ServiceNow, Microsoft SharePoint, Microsoft Teams, Microsoft Excel, Slack, Box, Google Workspace, SAP, Oracle NetSuite, Oracle E-Business Suite, Zendesk, Tableau, Procore, Ziflow, Gainsight, Zapier | Xero, QuickBooks, Sage Intacct, Exact Online, Google Calendar, Microsoft Exchange, HubSpot, Salesforce, Jira, Stripe, Expensify, Zapier |
Add a tool
Adds a column to the table, from the tools in this category.
Row where the values differ The small markers point at the lower number, the longer list or the stated feature. They describe the data, they are not a verdict.
The short version
Key Differences
- Starting price Planview AdaptiveWork Quote-based Scoro From €15 / user / month
- Free trial Planview AdaptiveWork Demo on request; Planview lists self-service trials only for AgilePlace and ProjectPlace, not for AdaptiveWork Scoro 14 days, no credit card
- Company size Planview AdaptiveWork Enterprise Scoro Small and mid-sized, Enterprise
- Hosting Planview AdaptiveWork Cloud, delivered as SaaS with web and mobile apps Scoro Cloud, GDPR-compliant
- Support Planview AdaptiveWork Email helpdesk, Community forum Scoro Email helpdesk, Phone, Chat
Every line is one datapoint from the table above, picked automatically. Nothing here is written text.
The trade-offs
Strengths and Limitations
Planview AdaptiveWork
Strengths
- Portfolio intake, project plan, resource capacity, time and project financials sit in one system rather than in separate tools
- Waterfall, agile and hybrid delivery are supported side by side, with Jira connected for teams that stay there
- Documented REST API plus prebuilt connections to Salesforce, ServiceNow, SAP, NetSuite and Oracle E-Business Suite
Limitations
- No published prices, so budgeting for it takes a sales conversation
- No self-service trial; Planview lists one for its AgilePlace and ProjectPlace products but not for AdaptiveWork
Scoro
Strengths
- Unifies projects, resources and finances in one PSA
- Strong profitability and financial insights
- Connects to the main accounting, calendar and automation tools
Limitations
- Higher price point
- Depth can be complex for small teams
Plans
Pricing
Planview AdaptiveWork
- Quote-based Not stated Planview publishes no price list for AdaptiveWork; quotes come from sales.
Scoro
- Time-billing €15 Per user and month, minimum 5 users. Combines the Track and Invoice apps.
- Projects & Resources €25 Per user and month, minimum 5 users. Combines Do, Deliver, Track and Resource.
- Quote to Cash €25 Per user and month, minimum 5 users. Combines Estimate, Deliver, Track and Invoice.
- End-to-end €52 Per user and month, minimum 5 users. All eight apps plus Advanced Work and Advanced Financials. Annual billing is 13 to 17 percent cheaper on every bundle.
What users say
Review Scores · opens after launch
Planview AdaptiveWork
- Ease of use
- Not rated yet
- User interface
- Not rated yet
- Onboarding
- Not rated yet
- Support and service
- Not rated yet
- Value for money
- Not rated yet
- Features
- Not rated yet
No reviews yet. Nothing has been published here yet, and no score is shown. How a review is checked before it appears is described below.
Scoro
- Ease of use
- Not rated yet
- User interface
- Not rated yet
- Onboarding
- Not rated yet
- Support and service
- Not rated yet
- Value for money
- Not rated yet
- Features
- Not rated yet
No reviews yet. Nothing has been published here yet, and no score is shown. How a review is checked before it appears is described below.
How we check reviews
Reviews are not published yet. The form on a tool's page works and reaches us, but nothing from it appears on this site, so no score here is based on a review. The rules below are the ones that will apply once reviews go live.
Every review is read by a person before it appears. We require a working email address and use it to come back to the author, so a review has a reachable sender rather than being anonymous. We publish positive and negative reviews alike, we pay nothing and offer nothing for a review, and we accept none that was bought or incentivised.
What we cannot do is verify a purchase. There is no shop here and no account, so whether the author really used the tool rests on what they tell us, plus the plausibility of what they write. We say so rather than implying a check that does not exist.
A vendor cannot have a review removed, cannot buy one, and cannot have one changed. Paid placement and a paid listing have no effect on which reviews appear or on any score.
Where this comes from
Where this comes from
Planview AdaptiveWork https://www.planview.com/products-solutions/products/adaptivework/ · no check date recorded yet
Scoro https://www.scoro.com · checked against the official source on 2026-09-01
This table lists factual criteria taken from information the vendors publish themselves. For how we put it together, see the methodology.