Best for
Best for professional-services firms that want projects, resources and finances in one PSA, from small consultancies to enterprises.
- Small and mid-sized
- Enterprise
No tools match
Press / to search, arrow keys to move, Enter to open
Agency Software Comparison
At a glance
Best for
Best for professional-services firms that want projects, resources and finances in one PSA, from small consultancies to enterprises.
Best for
Best for agencies and professional-services teams that want to run client projects from planning through billable time tracking to invoicing in one platform.
Cataleo does not name a winner. Both statements come from the vendors themselves.
| Criterion | Scoro | Teamwork.com |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | From €15 / user / month Time-billing bundle, minimum 5 users. The price rises with the apps combined, up to €52 for the end-to-end bundle; annual billing is 13 to 17 percent cheaper. | Free plan for up to 5 users; paid plans from $9.99 / user / month Basics plan, per user and month billed annually. Prices are in US dollars. |
| Free trial | 14 days, no credit card | 14-day free trial, no credit card required |
| API | Not stated | Yes, REST API |
| Languages | English, German, Estonian, French, Spanish | Not stated |
| Hosting | Cloud, GDPR-compliant | Cloud (SaaS) |
| Made in | Estonia | Not stated |
| Time tracking | Yes, billable and non-billable | Yes, billable and non-billable time tracking with billable-time reporting |
| Project costing | Yes, quoting and budgeting with an estimation matrix | Yes, fixed-fee budgets and retainers with cost-against-budget tracking |
| Invoicing | Yes, automated invoicing and billing, supplier bills and purchase orders | Yes, client invoices built from logged time |
| Resource planning | Yes, with capacity forecasting | Yes, workload planning and live capacity; scheduling by role or skill on higher plans |
| Reporting and controlling | Yes, real-time financials and profitability forecasting | Yes, project and client dashboards with profitability tracking |
| Integrations and API | Yes, API plus integrations with accounting, calendar and automation tools | Yes, REST API |
| AI features | Yes | Yes |
| MCP-ready | No | stated Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS), Browser-based | Cloud (SaaS), Browser-based |
| Support | Email helpdesk, Phone, Chat | Email helpdesk, Phone, Community forum |
| Onboarding | Personal consulting | more entries Documentation and knowledge base, Video tutorials, Live online demos and webinars, Guided onboarding |
| Company size | Small and mid-sized, Enterprise | Small and mid-sized, Enterprise |
| Integrations | more entries Xero, QuickBooks, Sage Intacct, Exact Online, Google Calendar, Microsoft Exchange, HubSpot, Salesforce, Jira, Stripe, Expensify, Zapier | Slack, Microsoft Office, Harvest, Xero, BugHerd, Screenful |
Adds a column to the table, from the tools in this category.
Row where the values differ The small markers point at the lower number, the longer list or the stated feature. They describe the data, they are not a verdict.
The short version
Every line is one datapoint from the table above, picked automatically. Nothing here is written text.
The trade-offs
Scoro
Strengths
Limitations
Teamwork.com
Strengths
Limitations
Plans
Scoro
Teamwork.com
What users say
Scoro
No reviews yet. Be the first to review this tool. Every review is checked for fairness before it appears, and the vendor cannot have one removed.
Teamwork.com
No reviews yet. Be the first to review this tool. Every review is checked for fairness before it appears, and the vendor cannot have one removed.
Where this comes from
Scoro https://www.scoro.com · checked against the official source on 2026-09-01
Teamwork.com https://www.teamwork.com · checked against the official source on 2026-08-20
This table lists factual criteria taken from information the vendors publish themselves. For how we put it together, see the methodology.