Best for
Best for software development teams running agile workflows.
- Small and mid-sized
- Enterprise
No tools match
Press / to search, arrow keys to move, Enter to open
Project Management Comparison
At a glance
Best for
Best for software development teams running agile workflows.
Best for
Best for delivery teams that need one plan in several views and, a tier up, the resourcing and timesheets to report on it.
Cataleo does not name a winner. Both statements come from the vendors themselves.
| Criterion | Jira | ProjectManager |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free; Standard from ~$7.91 / user / month Premium ~$15.25 per user and month, Enterprise on request. The free tier covers up to 10 users. | From $15 / user / month Team tier billed annually, $18 billed monthly. Business is $28 annually or $32 monthly and is where resourcing, timesheets and AI insights begin. |
| Free trial | Free tier | 30-day trial, no credit card and no user minimum |
| Users | Not stated | Team is capped at 10 users with unlimited read-only guest licences; Business and Enterprise remove the cap |
| API | Not stated | Yes, a documented API with code samples, plus connectors for Jira, Azure DevOps, Power BI, QuickBooks Online, Acumatica, Microsoft Teams, Slack, Excel and Trello |
| Made in | Australia | Not stated |
| Task planning | Yes, agile boards for Scrum and Kanban, with sprints, backlogs and roadmaps | Yes, unlimited tasks and subtasks across Gantt, list, sheet, board and calendar views, with dependencies, milestones, baselines, critical path and version control |
| Resource planning | Limited natively, capacity planning via Premium Advanced Roadmaps or marketplace apps | Yes, workload balancing with defined working days, labour rates and availability, from the Business tier |
| Time tracking | Yes, native worklogs | Yes, time logged on tasks and secure timesheets that populate from those hours, from the Business tier |
| Reporting and controlling | Yes | Yes, portfolio dashboards and shareable project reports including status, timesheet and workload reports, with advanced reporting from the Business tier |
| Integrations and API | Yes, deep developer-tool integration | Yes, an API with documentation and code samples, plus two-way sync with Jira and Azure DevOps and connectors for Power BI, QuickBooks Online, Acumatica, Microsoft Teams, Slack, Excel and Trello |
| AI features | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | more entries Cloud (SaaS), Browser-based, On-premise | Cloud (SaaS), Browser-based |
| Support | Not stated | Email helpdesk |
| Onboarding | Not stated | Documentation and knowledge base, Video tutorials, Live online demos and webinars, Guided onboarding, Personal consulting |
| Company size | Small and mid-sized, Enterprise | Small and mid-sized, Enterprise |
| Integrations | Confluence, Bitbucket, GitHub, GitLab, Slack, Tempo | more entries Jira, Azure DevOps, Microsoft Power BI, QuickBooks Online, Acumatica, Microsoft Teams, Slack, Microsoft Excel, Trello |
Adds a column to the table, from the tools in this category.
Row where the values differ The small markers point at the lower number, the longer list or the stated feature. They describe the data, they are not a verdict.
The short version
Every line is one datapoint from the table above, picked automatically. Nothing here is written text.
The trade-offs
Jira
Strengths
Limitations
ProjectManager
Strengths
Limitations
Plans
Jira
ProjectManager
What users say
Jira
No reviews yet. Be the first to review this tool. Every review is checked for fairness before it appears, and the vendor cannot have one removed.
ProjectManager
No reviews yet. Be the first to review this tool. Every review is checked for fairness before it appears, and the vendor cannot have one removed.
Where this comes from
Jira https://www.atlassian.com/software/jira · no check date recorded yet
ProjectManager https://www.projectmanager.com · no check date recorded yet
This table lists factual criteria taken from information the vendors publish themselves. For how we put it together, see the methodology.