Best for
Best for software development teams running agile workflows.
- Small and mid-sized
- Enterprise
No tools match
Press / to search, arrow keys to move, Enter to open
Project Management Comparison
At a glance
Best for
Best for software development teams running agile workflows.
Best for
Best for delivery teams that need one plan in several views and, a tier up, the resourcing and timesheets to report on it.
Cataleo does not name a winner. Both statements come from the vendors themselves.
| Criterion | Jira | ProjectManager |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free; Standard from ~$7.91 / user / month Premium ~$15.25 per user and month, Enterprise on request. The free tier covers up to 10 users. | From $15 / user / month Team tier billed annually, $18 billed monthly. Business is $28 annually or $32 monthly and is where resourcing, timesheets and AI insights begin. |
| Free trial | Free tier | 30-day trial, no credit card and no user minimum |
| Users | Not stated | Team is capped at 10 users with unlimited read-only guest licences; Business and Enterprise remove the cap |
| API | Not stated | Yes, a documented API with code samples, plus connectors for Jira, Azure DevOps, Power BI, QuickBooks Online, Acumatica, Microsoft Teams, Slack, Excel and Trello |
| Made in | Australia | Not stated |
| Task planning | Yes, agile boards for Scrum and Kanban, with sprints, backlogs and roadmaps | Yes, unlimited tasks and subtasks across Gantt, list, sheet, board and calendar views, with dependencies, milestones, baselines, critical path and version control |
| Resource planning | Limited natively, capacity planning via Premium Advanced Roadmaps or marketplace apps | Yes, workload balancing with defined working days, labour rates and availability, from the Business tier |
| Time tracking | Yes, native worklogs | Yes, time logged on tasks and secure timesheets that populate from those hours, from the Business tier |
| Reporting and controlling | Yes | Yes, portfolio dashboards and shareable project reports including status, timesheet and workload reports, with advanced reporting from the Business tier |
| Integrations and API | Yes, deep developer-tool integration | Yes, an API with documentation and code samples, plus two-way sync with Jira and Azure DevOps and connectors for Power BI, QuickBooks Online, Acumatica, Microsoft Teams, Slack, Excel and Trello |
| AI features | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | more entries Cloud (SaaS), Browser-based, On-premise | Cloud (SaaS), Browser-based |
| Support | more entries Email helpdesk, Phone, Community forum | Email helpdesk |
| Onboarding | Documentation and knowledge base, Live online demos and webinars | more entries Documentation and knowledge base, Video tutorials, Live online demos and webinars, Guided onboarding, Personal consulting |
| Company size | Small and mid-sized, Enterprise | Small and mid-sized, Enterprise |
| Integrations | Confluence, Bitbucket, GitHub, GitLab, Slack, Tempo | more entries Jira, Azure DevOps, Microsoft Power BI, QuickBooks Online, Acumatica, Microsoft Teams, Slack, Microsoft Excel, Trello |
Adds a column to the table, from the tools in this category.
Row where the values differ The small markers point at the lower number, the longer list or the stated feature. They describe the data, they are not a verdict.
The short version
Every line is one datapoint from the table above, picked automatically. Nothing here is written text.
The trade-offs
Jira
Strengths
Limitations
ProjectManager
Strengths
Limitations
Plans
Jira
ProjectManager
What users say
Jira
No reviews yet. Nothing has been published here yet, and no score is shown. How a review is checked before it appears is described below.
ProjectManager
No reviews yet. Nothing has been published here yet, and no score is shown. How a review is checked before it appears is described below.
Reviews are not published yet. The form on a tool's page works and reaches us, but nothing from it appears on this site, so no score here is based on a review. The rules below are the ones that will apply once reviews go live.
Every review is read by a person before it appears. We require a working email address and use it to come back to the author, so a review has a reachable sender rather than being anonymous. We publish positive and negative reviews alike, we pay nothing and offer nothing for a review, and we accept none that was bought or incentivised.
What we cannot do is verify a purchase. There is no shop here and no account, so whether the author really used the tool rests on what they tell us, plus the plausibility of what they write. We say so rather than implying a check that does not exist.
A vendor cannot have a review removed, cannot buy one, and cannot have one changed. Paid placement and a paid listing have no effect on which reviews appear or on any score.
Where this comes from
Jira https://www.atlassian.com/software/jira · no check date recorded yet
ProjectManager https://www.projectmanager.com · no check date recorded yet
This table lists factual criteria taken from information the vendors publish themselves. For how we put it together, see the methodology.