Best for
Best for software development teams running agile workflows.
- Small and mid-sized
- Enterprise
No tools match
Press / to search, arrow keys to move, Enter to open
Time Tracking Comparison
At a glance
Best for
Best for software development teams running agile workflows.
Best for
Best for firms that need 6-month capacity forecasting and what-if scenario planning.
Cataleo does not name a winner. Both statements come from the vendors themselves.
| Criterion | Jira | Runn |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free; Standard from ~$7.91 / user / month Premium ~$15.25 per user and month, Enterprise on request. The free tier covers up to 10 users. | Lite from $7 / resource seat / month Standard $11 per seat and month, Advanced on request. Seats count resources in the planner, not users with a login. Volume discounts start at 100+ seats. |
| Free trial | Free tier | 30-day trial of the Standard plan, no card required |
| Made in | Australia | New Zealand |
| Time tracking | Yes, native worklogs | Yes, timesheets from the Standard plan |
| Invoicing | No | No native invoicing; rate cards, budgets and margin only |
| Reporting and controlling | Yes | Yes, utilization, capacity, performance, workforce and bench reporting, with planned versus actuals against project budgets |
| Integrations and API | Yes, deep developer-tool integration | Yes, an API from the Standard plan, plus HR, time-tracking and automation integrations |
| AI features | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | more entries Cloud (SaaS), Browser-based, On-premise | Cloud (SaaS), Browser-based |
| Support | Not stated | Email helpdesk, Chat |
| Onboarding | Not stated | Documentation and knowledge base, Guided onboarding |
| Company size | Small and mid-sized, Enterprise | Small and mid-sized, Enterprise |
| Integrations | Confluence, Bitbucket, GitHub, GitLab, Slack, Tempo | more entries Jira, Harvest, Clockify, BambooHR, HiBob, Gusto, Workday, Sage HR, Zapier, n8n |
Adds a column to the table, from the tools in this category.
Row where the values differ The small markers point at the lower number, the longer list or the stated feature. They describe the data, they are not a verdict.
The short version
Every line is one datapoint from the table above, picked automatically. Nothing here is written text.
The trade-offs
Jira
Strengths
Limitations
Runn
Strengths
Limitations
Plans
Jira
Runn
What users say
Jira
No reviews yet. Be the first to review this tool. Every review is checked for fairness before it appears, and the vendor cannot have one removed.
Runn
No reviews yet. Be the first to review this tool. Every review is checked for fairness before it appears, and the vendor cannot have one removed.
Where this comes from
Jira https://www.atlassian.com/software/jira · no check date recorded yet
Runn https://www.runn.io · no check date recorded yet
This table lists factual criteria taken from information the vendors publish themselves. For how we put it together, see the methodology.