CataleoSoftware Get Your Software Listed Get Listed

Agency Software Comparison

awork vs. MOCO

At a glance

At a glance

awork

Best for

Best for agencies and service teams that want strong project management, time tracking and resource planning with EU/German hosting, without built-in invoicing.

  • Freelancers
  • Small and mid-sized

MOCO

Best for

Best for small and mid-sized agencies, consultancies and IT service providers that want quoting, time tracking and invoicing in one focused tool.

  • Freelancers
  • Small and mid-sized

Cataleo does not name a winner. Both statements come from the vendors themselves.

Full Comparison

Criterion awork MOCO
Starting price lower value From €5 / user / month Billed annually. From €15 / user / month Core plan, per user and month excluding VAT. Pro is €21 and Unlimited €24, the latter from 25 users.
Free trial 14 days 30 days
Languages German, English German, English
Hosting EU (Germany, Frankfurt), ISO/IEC 27001 certified, GDPR-compliant Cloud, Swiss-made
Made in Germany (Hamburg) Switzerland
Time tracking Yes, in the app and from calendar appointments Yes, stopwatch, NFC, mobile app and work-time recording
Project costing Yes, time-based project budgets calculated from stored hourly rates, with retainer budgets and tracked-versus-planned comparison Yes, quotes and offers, budgets with alerts
Invoicing No built-in invoicing or accounting, available through integrations Yes, invoicing by effort with hour statements, multi-currency
Resource planning Yes, resource and capacity planning Yes, capacity and utilisation planning
Reporting and controlling Yes, dashboards, reporting and analytics Yes, profitability reporting
Integrations and API Yes, API Yes, API
AI features Yes Yes
MCP-ready No stated Yes
Deployment Cloud (SaaS), Browser-based Cloud (SaaS), Browser-based
Support more entries Email helpdesk, Chat, Phone Chat
Onboarding Guided onboarding more entries Documentation and knowledge base, Video tutorials
Company size Freelancers, Small and mid-sized Freelancers, Small and mid-sized
Integrations Slack, Salesforce, Google Sheets, MOCO, sevdesk, Lexware Office, easybill, bexio, Xero, API more entries DATEV Unternehmen online, Personio, Slack, Jira, Asana, Microsoft Power BI, Memtime, GetMyInvoices, Make, Zapier, Webhooks, API

Compare more tools

Row where the values differ The small markers point at the lower number, the longer list or the stated feature. They describe the data, they are not a verdict.

The short version

Key Differences

  • Starting price awork From €5 / user / month MOCO From €15 / user / month
  • Free trial awork 14 days MOCO 30 days
  • Hosting awork EU (Germany, Frankfurt), ISO/IEC 27001 certified, GDPR-compliant MOCO Cloud, Swiss-made
  • Support awork Email helpdesk, Chat, Phone MOCO Chat
  • Made in awork Germany (Hamburg) MOCO Switzerland

Every line is one datapoint from the table above, picked automatically. Nothing here is written text.

The trade-offs

Strengths and Limitations

awork

Strengths

  • Purpose-built for agency workflows
  • Easy, enjoyable UI
  • German hosting, ISO 27001 and GDPR
  • Free external collaboration

Limitations

  • No built-in invoicing/accounting (needs integrations)
  • Less suited to enterprise-wide or complex long-term planning

MOCO

Strengths

  • Time entry by stopwatch, voice, calendar entry or mobile
  • Clean quote-to-invoice and time tracking
  • Responsive in-app chat support

Limitations

  • Interface can feel complex for new users
  • Lighter on heavy enterprise depth

Plans

Pricing

awork

  • Basic €5 Per user and month, billed annually. €8 billed monthly.
  • Standard €12 Per user and month, billed annually. €16 billed monthly.
Visit site

MOCO

  • Core €15 Per user and month, excluding VAT. Core functions for sole traders and small teams.
  • Pro €21 Per user and month, excluding VAT. Adds leads, capacity planning and incoming invoices, with AI-assisted OCR and single sign-on included.
  • Unlimited €24 Per user and month, excluding VAT. All-inclusive plan from 25 users, with a personal Q&A session.
Visit site

What users say

Review Scores · opens after launch

awork

Ease of use
Not rated yet
User interface
Not rated yet
Onboarding
Not rated yet
Support and service
Not rated yet
Value for money
Not rated yet
Features
Not rated yet

No reviews yet. Nothing has been published here yet, and no score is shown. How a review is checked before it appears is described below.

MOCO

Ease of use
Not rated yet
User interface
Not rated yet
Onboarding
Not rated yet
Support and service
Not rated yet
Value for money
Not rated yet
Features
Not rated yet

No reviews yet. Nothing has been published here yet, and no score is shown. How a review is checked before it appears is described below.

How we check reviews

Reviews are not published yet. The form on a tool's page works and reaches us, but nothing from it appears on this site, so no score here is based on a review. The rules below are the ones that will apply once reviews go live.

Every review is read by a person before it appears. We require a working email address and use it to come back to the author, so a review has a reachable sender rather than being anonymous. We publish positive and negative reviews alike, we pay nothing and offer nothing for a review, and we accept none that was bought or incentivised.

What we cannot do is verify a purchase. There is no shop here and no account, so whether the author really used the tool rests on what they tell us, plus the plausibility of what they write. We say so rather than implying a check that does not exist.

A vendor cannot have a review removed, cannot buy one, and cannot have one changed. Paid placement and a paid listing have no effect on which reviews appear or on any score.

Where this comes from

Where this comes from

awork https://www.awork.com · checked against the official source on 2026-08-14

MOCO https://www.mocoapp.com · checked against the official source on 2026-09-01

This table lists factual criteria taken from information the vendors publish themselves. For how we put it together, see the methodology.