Best for
Best for teams that live in GitHub and want one vendor for hosting, CI/CD and AI assistance.
- Freelancers
- Small and mid-sized
- Enterprise
No tools match
Press / to search, arrow keys to move, Enter to open
AI Code Comparison
At a glance
Best for
Best for teams that live in GitHub and want one vendor for hosting, CI/CD and AI assistance.
Best for
Best for developers who want an agent, chat and autocomplete in one open-source tool, with a self-hosted option for privacy.
Cataleo does not name a winner. Both statements come from the vendors themselves.
| Criterion | GitHub Copilot | Refact.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free tier; Pro $10 / month The free tier covers 2,000 completions per month. Pro+ $39 per month, Enterprise $39 per user. Billing moved to usage-based AI Credits on 1 June 2026. | Free tier; Pro $10 / month The free plan includes unlimited completions and limited daily agent use. Enterprise is custom, with on-premise deployment and fine-tuning. |
| Free trial | Free tier with 2,000 completions per month | Free tier |
| Commercial use | Yes, with IP indemnity | Yes |
| Output | Completions plus agent mode | Agentic coding, chat and completion in the IDE |
| API | Yes, the GitHub Copilot SDK, with examples in TypeScript, Python, Go, .NET, Java and Rust, plus an API for the cloud coding agent | Bring your own key |
| Hosting | Not stated | Cloud or self-hosted on-premise |
| Where it runs | Visual Studio Code, Visual Studio, the JetBrains IDEs, Eclipse, Xcode, Vim and Neovim and Azure Data Studio, plus GitHub.com, GitHub Mobile and the GitHub CLI | Plugins for VS Code and JetBrains IDEs, with Visual Studio, Neovim and Sublime Text in beta |
| Inline completions | Yes, inline completions and chat | Yes, real-time completion on Qwen2.5-Coder with retrieval for context |
| Agent mode | Yes, agent mode from issue to pull request | Yes, an autonomous agent that plans and executes multi-step tasks |
| Model choice | Yes, models from Anthropic, OpenAI, Google, xAI, Moonshot AI and Microsoft; which ones are offered depends on the plan and the client | Claude and GPT models built in, plus bring-your-own-key for Gemini, Grok and DeepSeek |
| Data control | Business and Enterprise customer data is not used to train models; a duplicate-detection filter blocks suggestions matching about 150 characters of public code, and free and individual plans carry a training opt-out | Self-hosted, on-premise deployment keeps code private |
| Ecosystem fit | GitHub, one vendor for hosting, CI/CD and AI | IDE plugins across VS Code and JetBrains, open source with a self-hosted server |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS), Browser-based | Cloud (SaaS), On-premise |
| Support | Email helpdesk, Community forum | Not stated |
| Onboarding | Documentation and knowledge base | Documentation and knowledge base |
| Company size | Freelancers, Small and mid-sized, Enterprise | Freelancers, Small and mid-sized, Enterprise |
| Integrations | Visual Studio Code, Visual Studio, JetBrains IDEs, Eclipse, Xcode, Vim/Neovim, Azure Data Studio, GitHub.com, GitHub Mobile, GitHub CLI, Slack, Microsoft Teams, Raycast | Not stated |
Adds a column to the table, from the tools in this category.
Row where the values differ The small markers point at the lower number, the longer list or the stated feature. They describe the data, they are not a verdict.
The short version
Every line is one datapoint from the table above, picked automatically. Nothing here is written text.
The trade-offs
GitHub Copilot
Strengths
Limitations
Refact.ai
Strengths
Limitations
Plans
GitHub Copilot
Refact.ai
What users say
GitHub Copilot
No reviews yet. Nothing has been published here yet, and no score is shown. How a review is checked before it appears is described below.
Refact.ai
No reviews yet. Nothing has been published here yet, and no score is shown. How a review is checked before it appears is described below.
Reviews are not published yet. The form on a tool's page works and reaches us, but nothing from it appears on this site, so no score here is based on a review. The rules below are the ones that will apply once reviews go live.
Every review is read by a person before it appears. We require a working email address and use it to come back to the author, so a review has a reachable sender rather than being anonymous. We publish positive and negative reviews alike, we pay nothing and offer nothing for a review, and we accept none that was bought or incentivised.
What we cannot do is verify a purchase. There is no shop here and no account, so whether the author really used the tool rests on what they tell us, plus the plausibility of what they write. We say so rather than implying a check that does not exist.
A vendor cannot have a review removed, cannot buy one, and cannot have one changed. Paid placement and a paid listing have no effect on which reviews appear or on any score.
Where this comes from
GitHub Copilot https://github.com/features/copilot · no check date recorded yet
Refact.ai https://refact.ai · no check date recorded yet
This table lists factual criteria taken from information the vendors publish themselves. For how we put it together, see the methodology.