Best for
Best for independent agencies that are starting out or growing and want quoting and agency management under one login.
- Small and mid-sized
Insurance Agency Software Comparison
At a glance
Best for
Best for independent agencies that are starting out or growing and want quoting and agency management under one login.
Best for
Best for independent insurance agencies that want carrier downloads, commissions, accounting and a client portal in one cloud system.
Cataleo does not name a winner. Both statements come from the vendors themselves.
| Criterion | EZLynx | JenesisNow |
|---|---|---|
| Free trial | Free trial offered; length and conditions not stated | Not stated |
| Users | More than 37,000 agencies, according to the vendor | Not stated |
| Hosting | Cloud-based and browser-accessible, no software to install | Cloud-based; the vendor states data is stored on US servers |
| Clients and policies | Personal and commercial lines policies, documents, service requests and client communications on one client record, viewed and updated in real time from any device | Client and policy records in one system, with policy documents, certificates, photos, licences and contracts kept as media files per client, and a library of blank and pre-filled ACORD forms |
| Lines of business and markets | Personal and commercial lines; the comparative rater quotes home and auto in 48 US states, and the trial page names auto, home, dwelling fire and other policies | Personal and commercial lines are named for carrier downloads; life, health and benefits are not mentioned |
| Comparative rating and quoting | Comparative Rater quotes home and auto with 330+ carriers from one entry, with prefill and verified lookups via LexisNexis, Fenris, MSB and Google Maps. A separate commercial lines rater sends one entry to appointed carriers for real-time quotes, with NAICS appetite guidance. | Integrations with third-party comparative raters, named as PL Rater and ITC TurboRater, for comparing personal lines quotes across carriers; agencies in North Carolina also get a built-in comparative rater with direct access to named carriers. The vendor states that a product on this page carries additional charges outside the standard monthly fee |
| Carrier downloads and connectivity | Carrier data through Ivans connections, which the vendor says update every 15 to 45 minutes; policies can be rated, bound and issued through carrier websites | Downloads of personal and commercial lines policy data, renewals, endorsements and commissions, with IVANS, Ebix and Brovada named as carrier data integrations; the number of carriers is not stated |
| Sales pipeline and renewals | Built-in CRM with a visual sales pipeline, marketing automation and email campaigns, a patented retention workflow and automated renewal quoting | Renewal reminders that can be filtered by status and effective date, and import of customer and prospect lists from a CSV file |
| Commissions and agency accounting | Policy accounting and billing in the workflow, digital and self-service payments, and automated commission calculations and reporting | Commission Manager for tracking commissions, setting user and company commission percentages and receiving commission downloads, plus accounting tools with invoicing, receipts and a QuickBooks export |
| Client portal and certificates | Client Center self-service portal where policyholders view policy information, download ID cards, generate certificates of insurance, submit change requests and follow claims | Client portal where insured customers view coverages, policy documents, certificates of insurance and payment history, and print and share documents, plus e-signature for applications, receipts and statements of no loss |
| Compliance records and audit trail | A policy change request submitted through the customer portal creates an audit trail automatically; accounting includes auditing capabilities with a structured month-end close workflow, and earned commissions are kept apart from premiums to keep the premium trust balanced | Agency-wide and location-specific user permissions, a separate permission for access to policy-level commission values, and a note and agency log entry whenever the company, term or term date of a policy is changed |
| Reports and exports | Real-time reports on agency performance, retention and revenue, plus commission reporting | Customizable reports for production, renewals, source of business, CSR efficiency and lines of business, with dashboards |
| Integrations and API | Technology partner integrations for carrier connectivity, data prefill, lead generation, payments and communication, among them Ivans and LexisNexis | Integrations with PL Rating, TurboRater, QuickBooks, IVANS, Ebix, DocuSign, Formstack Sign, RingCentral, Twilio, Zapier and others; a public API is not mentioned on the vendor site |
| AI features | stated Yes | No |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS) | Cloud (SaaS) |
| Support | Email helpdesk, Phone | Email helpdesk, Phone |
| Onboarding | Guided onboarding | Not stated |
| Company size | Small and mid-sized | Not stated |
| Integrations | Ivans, LexisNexis, Fenris, MSB, Google Maps, Microsoft Outlook | more entries PL Rating, TurboRater, QuickBooks, IVANS, Ebix, Brovada, DocuSign, Formstack Sign, RingCentral, Twilio, Zapier, Imperial PFS |
Adds a column to the table, from the tools in this category.
Row where the values differ The small markers point at the lower number, the longer list or the stated feature. They describe the data, they are not a verdict.
The short version
Every line is one datapoint from the table above, picked automatically. Nothing here is written text.
The trade-offs
EZLynx
Strengths
Limitations
JenesisNow
Strengths
Limitations
Plans
EZLynx
Price on Request
Visit siteJenesisNow
Price on Request
Visit siteWhat users say
EZLynx
No reviews yet. Nothing has been published here yet, and no score is shown. How a review is checked before it appears is described below.
JenesisNow
No reviews yet. Nothing has been published here yet, and no score is shown. How a review is checked before it appears is described below.
Before sending, the author has to confirm three things: that they have used the product themselves, that they work neither for the vendor nor for a competitor, and that nobody is paying them for the review. We also ask whether the vendor invited them to write it. That answer is required, either answer is accepted, and it stays with the review.
Every review is read by a person before it appears. An email address is required and is confirmed: we send a link to it, and a review does not reach us until the author opens that link, so a review has a sender who was reachable at least once rather than being anonymous. Where what somebody writes needs backing, we ask them for evidence that they used the product, and a review that does not get it is not published. We publish positive and negative reviews alike, we pay nothing and offer nothing for a review, and we accept none that was bought or incentivised.
What we cannot do is verify a purchase. There is no shop here and no account, so whether the author really used the tool rests on their own declaration, on whatever we ask them for, and on the plausibility of what they write. We say so rather than implying a check that does not exist.
A vendor cannot buy a review, and cannot have one removed or changed because they dislike it. We remove or edit a review only if it breaks our rules or the law, for example a false statement of fact. Paid placement has no effect on which reviews appear or on any score.
Where this comes from
EZLynx https://www.ezlynx.com/ · checked against the official source on 2026-11-05
JenesisNow https://www.jenesissoftware.com/ · checked against the official source on 2026-11-08
This table lists factual criteria taken from information the vendors publish themselves. For how we put it together, see the methodology.