Best for
Best for engineering, architecture and consulting firms that want capacity planning, project tasks and timesheets in one system.
- Small and mid-sized
- Enterprise
Resource Planning Comparison
EG Silverbucket vs. Ganttic
At a glance
At a glance
Best for
Best for teams that schedule mixed resources like people, equipment and vehicles across many projects.
- Small and mid-sized
- Enterprise
Cataleo does not name a winner. Both statements come from the vendors themselves.
Full Comparison
| Criterion | EG Silverbucket | Ganttic |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Quote-based Priced on the number of active people in the resourcing pool rather than on logins or feature tiers, with archived users free of charge; the subscription includes all features, while integration, maintenance and training are bought on demand. No amounts are published. | Free for up to 10 resources Paid PRO plans are priced by the number of scheduled resources, not users; users are unlimited. |
| Free trial | 30 days, full access, no credit card required | 14-day trial |
| Users | EG cites over 40,000 users | Not stated |
| API | Yes, an API for people, projects, customers and actual hours, plus bulk CSV and XLSX imports and single sign-on | Not stated |
| Made in | Finland (Silverbucket, Tampere, part of the Danish EG group since 2021) | Not stated |
| Resource planning | Yes, drag-to-select percentage allocation to named people or role placeholders, structured resourcing requests with best-match candidate comparison, tentative allocations for modelling unconfirmed bids, competency tracking and a portfolio overview | Yes, drag-and-drop scheduling of people, equipment, vehicles and rooms with capacity views |
| Task planning | Yes, tasks within each project on an interactive Gantt timeline, with milestones at both project and programme level | Yes, tasks scheduled across projects on a shared Gantt chart |
| Time tracking | Yes, built-in timesheets with comments per entry and locking after a defined period; logged hours update allocation actuals directly, and an existing time registration tool can be integrated instead | Used time can be logged against a task in intervals, each recorded with the user and date, but there is no timesheet module |
| Reporting and controlling | Yes, forecast and actual reports on utilisation, income, hour budgets and invoicing, a performance dashboard for billability, fee recovery and margins, a custom export builder to PDF or Excel, a filtered activity feed and a Power BI connection | Yes, utilization and workload reports with forecasting |
| AI features | stated Yes | No |
| MCP-ready | stated Yes | No |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS), Browser-based | Cloud (SaaS), Browser-based |
| Support | more entries Email helpdesk, Phone | Email helpdesk |
| Onboarding | Documentation and knowledge base, Personal consulting | more entries Documentation and knowledge base, Video tutorials, Guided onboarding, Live online demos and webinars, On-site training |
| Company size | Small and mid-sized, Enterprise | Small and mid-sized, Enterprise |
| Integrations | more entries Power BI, Microsoft Excel | Google Calendar |
Add a tool
Adds a column to the table, from the tools in this category.
Row where the values differ The small markers point at the lower number, the longer list or the stated feature. They describe the data, they are not a verdict.
The short version
Key Differences
- Starting price EG Silverbucket Quote-based Ganttic Free for up to 10 resources
- Free trial EG Silverbucket 30 days, full access, no credit card required Ganttic 14-day trial
- Support EG Silverbucket Email helpdesk, Phone Ganttic Email helpdesk
- AI features EG Silverbucket Yes Ganttic No
- MCP-ready EG Silverbucket Yes Ganttic No
Every line is one datapoint from the table above, picked automatically. Nothing here is written text.
The trade-offs
Strengths and Limitations
EG Silverbucket
Strengths
- Planning, tasks and timesheets sit in one system, so actual hours update allocations without an export or reconciliation
- Tentative allocations model several unconfirmed projects at once and convert to confirmed in a single click
- An MCP server over HTTP lets an AI client read and write projects, allocations, actuals and capacity
- 30 day free trial with full access and no credit card
Limitations
- No published amounts, so the per-person price comes from sales
- Parts of the AI assistant are dated to the second half of 2026, and the product pages do not agree on what is available now
- The bill scales with the number of people planned, which suits a stable pool better than a fast-growing one
Ganttic
Strengths
- Schedules any resource type, not just people
- Resource-based pricing with unlimited users
- Free for organizations with up to 10 resources
Limitations
- Scheduling-first, lighter on financials than a full PSA
Plans
Pricing
EG Silverbucket
- Free trial $0 30 days, full access to all features, no credit card required.
- Subscription Not stated Priced per active person in the resourcing pool, with archived users free and all features included. Integration, maintenance and training are available on demand. EG publishes no amounts.
Ganttic
- Free $0 Up to 10 resources, all features except API access.
- PRO Not stated Priced by the number of scheduled resources; users are unlimited.
What users say
Review Scores · opens after launch
EG Silverbucket
- Ease of use
- Not rated yet
- User interface
- Not rated yet
- Onboarding
- Not rated yet
- Support and service
- Not rated yet
- Value for money
- Not rated yet
- Features
- Not rated yet
No reviews yet. Nothing has been published here yet, and no score is shown. How a review is checked before it appears is described below.
Ganttic
- Ease of use
- Not rated yet
- User interface
- Not rated yet
- Onboarding
- Not rated yet
- Support and service
- Not rated yet
- Value for money
- Not rated yet
- Features
- Not rated yet
No reviews yet. Nothing has been published here yet, and no score is shown. How a review is checked before it appears is described below.
How we check reviews
Before sending, the author has to confirm three things: that they have used the product themselves, that they work neither for the vendor nor for a competitor, and that nobody is paying them for the review. We also ask whether the vendor invited them to write it. That answer is required, either answer is accepted, and it stays with the review.
Every review is read by a person before it appears. An email address is required and is confirmed: we send a link to it, and a review does not reach us until the author opens that link, so a review has a sender who was reachable at least once rather than being anonymous. Where what somebody writes needs backing, we ask them for evidence that they used the product, and a review that does not get it is not published. We publish positive and negative reviews alike, we pay nothing and offer nothing for a review, and we accept none that was bought or incentivised.
What we cannot do is verify a purchase. There is no shop here and no account, so whether the author really used the tool rests on their own declaration, on whatever we ask them for, and on the plausibility of what they write. We say so rather than implying a check that does not exist.
A vendor cannot buy a review, and cannot have one removed or changed because they dislike it. We remove or edit a review only if it breaks our rules or the law, for example a false statement of fact. Paid placement has no effect on which reviews appear or on any score.
Where this comes from
Where this comes from
EG Silverbucket https://www.silverbucket.com · checked against the official source on 2026-09-11
Ganttic https://www.ganttic.com · no check date recorded yet
This table lists factual criteria taken from information the vendors publish themselves. For how we put it together, see the methodology.