CataleoSoftware
For Vendors

Resource Planning Comparison

Ganttic vs. Mosaic

At a glance

At a glance

Ganttic

Best for

Best for teams that schedule mixed resources like people, equipment and vehicles across many projects.

  • Small and mid-sized
  • Enterprise

Mosaic

Best for

Best for teams that want AI forecasting and headcount scenario modeling.

  • Small and mid-sized
  • Enterprise

Cataleo does not name a winner. Both statements come from the vendors themselves.

Full Comparison

Criterion Ganttic Mosaic
Starting price Free for up to 10 resources Paid PRO plans are priced by the number of scheduled resources, not users; users are unlimited. From ~$9.99 / user / month Up to ~$16.99 per user and month depending on features.
Free trial 14-day trial Free trial
Made in Not stated USA
Resource planning Yes, drag-and-drop scheduling of people, equipment, vehicles and rooms with capacity views Yes, AI-powered forecasting with workload heat maps and headcount scenario modeling
Task planning Yes, tasks scheduled across projects on a shared Gantt chart Yes, project and portfolio views
Time tracking Used time can be logged against a task in intervals, each recorded with the user and date, but there is no timesheet module Through a time-tracking integration, for planned versus actual
Reporting and controlling Yes, utilization and workload reports with forecasting Yes, workload heat maps and planned versus actual
AI features No stated Yes
Deployment Cloud (SaaS), Browser-based Cloud (SaaS), Browser-based
Support Email helpdesk more entries Chat, Phone
Onboarding more entries Documentation and knowledge base, Video tutorials, Guided onboarding, Live online demos and webinars, On-site training Guided onboarding
Company size Small and mid-sized, Enterprise Small and mid-sized, Enterprise
Integrations Google Calendar more entries Jira, Asana, Monday, QuickBooks

Compare more tools

Row where the values differ The small markers point at the lower number, the longer list or the stated feature. They describe the data, they are not a verdict.

The short version

Key Differences

  • Starting price Ganttic Free for up to 10 resources Mosaic From ~$9.99 / user / month
  • Free trial Ganttic 14-day trial Mosaic Free trial
  • Support Ganttic Email helpdesk Mosaic Chat, Phone
  • AI features Ganttic No Mosaic Yes
  • Resource planning Ganttic Yes, drag-and-drop scheduling of people, equipment, vehicles and rooms with capacity views Mosaic Yes, AI-powered forecasting with workload heat maps and headcount scenario modeling

Every line is one datapoint from the table above, picked automatically. Nothing here is written text.

The trade-offs

Strengths and Limitations

Ganttic

Strengths

  • Schedules any resource type, not just people
  • Resource-based pricing with unlimited users
  • Free for organizations with up to 10 resources

Limitations

  • Scheduling-first, lighter on financials than a full PSA

Mosaic

Strengths

  • AI forecasting
  • Clear workload heatmaps
  • Headcount scenario modeling

Limitations

  • Overlaps with project management tools
  • Exact tier pricing varies by features

Plans

Pricing

Ganttic

  • Free $0 Up to 10 resources, all features except API access.
  • PRO Not stated Priced by the number of scheduled resources; users are unlimited.
Visit site

Mosaic

  • Not stated ~$9.99 to ~$16.99 Per user and month, depending on features.
Visit site

What users say

Review Scores · opens after launch

Ganttic

Ease of use
Not rated yet
User interface
Not rated yet
Onboarding
Not rated yet
Support and service
Not rated yet
Value for money
Not rated yet
Features
Not rated yet

No reviews yet. Nothing has been published here yet, and no score is shown. How a review is checked before it appears is described below.

Mosaic

Ease of use
Not rated yet
User interface
Not rated yet
Onboarding
Not rated yet
Support and service
Not rated yet
Value for money
Not rated yet
Features
Not rated yet

No reviews yet. Nothing has been published here yet, and no score is shown. How a review is checked before it appears is described below.

How we check reviews

Before sending, the author has to confirm three things: that they have used the product themselves, that they work neither for the vendor nor for a competitor, and that nobody is paying them for the review. We also ask whether the vendor invited them to write it. That answer is required, either answer is accepted, and it stays with the review.

Every review is read by a person before it appears. An email address is required and is confirmed: we send a link to it, and a review does not reach us until the author opens that link, so a review has a sender who was reachable at least once rather than being anonymous. Where what somebody writes needs backing, we ask them for evidence that they used the product, and a review that does not get it is not published. We publish positive and negative reviews alike, we pay nothing and offer nothing for a review, and we accept none that was bought or incentivised.

What we cannot do is verify a purchase. There is no shop here and no account, so whether the author really used the tool rests on their own declaration, on whatever we ask them for, and on the plausibility of what they write. We say so rather than implying a check that does not exist.

A vendor cannot buy a review, and cannot have one removed or changed because they dislike it. We remove or edit a review only if it breaks our rules or the law, for example a false statement of fact. Paid placement has no effect on which reviews appear or on any score.

Read the full version on our methodology page

Where this comes from

Where this comes from

Ganttic https://www.ganttic.com · no check date recorded yet

Mosaic https://www.mosaicapp.com · no check date recorded yet

This table lists factual criteria taken from information the vendors publish themselves. For how we put it together, see the methodology.