Best for
Best for PMOs that balance capacity across many teams while those teams keep working in their own tools.
- Enterprise
Resource Planning Comparison
At a glance
Best for
Best for PMOs that balance capacity across many teams while those teams keep working in their own tools.
Best for
Best for enterprise PMOs forecasting capacity across a portfolio whose project plans already live in several different tools.
Cataleo does not name a winner. Both statements come from the vendors themselves.
| Criterion | Meisterplan | Tempus Resource |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | From $720 / month The smallest package is the Basic edition for 50 resources, at $720 per month or $7,200 per year. Users are free and unlimited, so only the people booked to projects count. Packages run up to 1,000 resources; above that the vendor quotes. | Quote-based ProSymmetry states that pricing is tailored to planning needs, team size and implementation goals; no price list is published. |
| Free trial | 30 days, no credit card required, with the functionality of the Pro Edition | 30-day free trial, covering Tempus Resource, Tempus Portfolio or both |
| Users | Users are free and unlimited; licensing counts resources, where one full-time equivalent equals one resource | Not stated |
| API | Yes, REST API plus a separate reporting API and an MCP endpoint | Yes, a REST API included for all users at no additional cost |
| Hosting | Cloud | Cloud or on-premises |
| Made in | Germany (itdesign, Tuebingen) | United States (ProSymmetry, Beachwood, Ohio) |
| Resource planning | Yes, capacity planning at portfolio level with a Team Planner histogram, role-based staffing by availability and what-if scenarios | Yes, capacity and demand planning from a central resource catalogue with custom attributes, heat maps for over- and under-allocation by role, department or skill, forecasting six to thirty-six months out, and What-If resequencing of the portfolio |
| Task planning | No, planning stops at the allocation of people to projects; task detail stays in the connected tools | No task planning of its own; project plans come from connected tools such as Microsoft Project, Jira and Smartsheet |
| Time tracking | No time entry of its own; actual time worked can be imported from Jira nightly and compared with planned allocations | Yes, timesheets are part of the platform, so planned time can be compared against actual time spent |
| Reporting and controlling | Yes, portfolio dashboards, financial planning and a reporting API for Power BI, Tableau and Looker Studio | Yes, standard reporting plus the Insight+ module for dynamic dashboards, and audit logging that records the before and after of every change |
| AI features | stated Yes | No |
| MCP-ready | stated Yes | No |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS), Browser-based | more entries Cloud (SaaS), Browser-based, On-premise |
| Support | Email helpdesk, Phone | Phone, Email helpdesk |
| Onboarding | more entries Documentation and knowledge base, Guided onboarding, Live online demos and webinars, Personal consulting | Guided onboarding |
| Company size | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Integrations | more entries Jira, Asana, ClickUp, monday.com, Trello, Wrike, Todoist, Microsoft Azure DevOps, Microsoft Planner, ServiceNow, Smartsheet, Salesforce, Microsoft Teams, Slack, Microsoft Outlook, Microsoft Power BI, Tableau, Google Looker Studio, Microsoft Excel, Zapier | Workday, SAP SuccessFactors, SAP, Oracle, ServiceNow, Jira, Microsoft Project, Microsoft Dynamics, Microsoft Azure DevOps, Microsoft SharePoint, Microsoft Excel, Smartsheet, Salesforce, PeopleSoft, Wolters Kluwer |
Adds a column to the table, from the tools in this category.
Row where the values differ The small markers point at the lower number, the longer list or the stated feature. They describe the data, they are not a verdict.
The short version
Every line is one datapoint from the table above, picked automatically. Nothing here is written text.
The trade-offs
Meisterplan
Strengths
Limitations
Tempus Resource
Strengths
Limitations
Plans
Meisterplan
Tempus Resource
What users say
Meisterplan
No reviews yet. Nothing has been published here yet, and no score is shown. How a review is checked before it appears is described below.
Tempus Resource
No reviews yet. Nothing has been published here yet, and no score is shown. How a review is checked before it appears is described below.
Before sending, the author has to confirm three things: that they have used the product themselves, that they work neither for the vendor nor for a competitor, and that nobody is paying them for the review. We also ask whether the vendor invited them to write it. That answer is required, either answer is accepted, and it stays with the review.
Every review is read by a person before it appears. An email address is required and is confirmed: we send a link to it, and a review does not reach us until the author opens that link, so a review has a sender who was reachable at least once rather than being anonymous. Where what somebody writes needs backing, we ask them for evidence that they used the product, and a review that does not get it is not published. We publish positive and negative reviews alike, we pay nothing and offer nothing for a review, and we accept none that was bought or incentivised.
What we cannot do is verify a purchase. There is no shop here and no account, so whether the author really used the tool rests on their own declaration, on whatever we ask them for, and on the plausibility of what they write. We say so rather than implying a check that does not exist.
A vendor cannot buy a review, and cannot have one removed or changed because they dislike it. We remove or edit a review only if it breaks our rules or the law, for example a false statement of fact. Paid placement has no effect on which reviews appear or on any score.
Where this comes from
Meisterplan https://www.meisterplan.com · no check date recorded yet
Tempus Resource https://www.prosymmetry.com/product/tempus-resource · no check date recorded yet
This table lists factual criteria taken from information the vendors publish themselves. For how we put it together, see the methodology.