CataleoSoftware
For Vendors

Trademark Search & Monitoring Comparison

Australian Trade Mark Search vs. Corsearch

At a glance

At a glance

Australian Trade Mark Search

Best for

Best for applicants and practitioners who want to search the Australian trade mark register themselves before filing with IP Australia.

Corsearch

Best for

Best for brand owners and IP professionals who want screening, clearance and watching with analyst review across many jurisdictions.

Cataleo does not name a winner. Both statements come from the vendors themselves.

Full Comparison

Criterion Australian Trade Mark Search Corsearch
Output Lists of matching trade marks with full record details, an Excel export of up to 2,000 results, print-friendly pages and PDF reports Not stated
API Australian Trade Mark Search API with a quick search and a lookup by trade mark number, using OAuth 2.0 client credentials Not stated
Hosting Web app at search.ipaustralia.gov.au Not stated
Made in Australia Not stated
Registers and countries covered Registered and pending Australian trade marks, including trade marks registered with the International Bureau designating Australia, which are found by their international registration number The vendor cites 190 searchable trademark registries and 240 jurisdictions and territories watched for new marks, within more than 1,000 trademark, company name, domain, design, pharma and common law databases
Word, phonetic and image search Word searches with exact, prefix, suffix, part, stem, fuzzy and phonetic options, phrases with AND, OR, NOT, quotes and wildcards, image search by visual similarity from an uploaded PNG, JPG, GIF, BMP or SVG up to 8 MB, advanced image search with standard image constituent terms, and searches by number or range, owner, party, address for service, goods and services text, status, dates, type and flags such as non-use Similarity search across phonetic, semantic and visual similarity in ExaMatch and NameCheck, logo and device search through LogoCheck image recognition, and an AI query assist that turns plain language into a search query
Goods, services and Nice classes Searches across the 45 classes, with associated classes included by default; choosing Single limits the search to the classes entered Clearance searches take goods and services, classes and jurisdictions as their criteria, and an AI Product Insights feature categorises products for filings
Clearance and conflict screening A search of the register and not a clearance opinion: IP Australia says a trade marks attorney or lawyer can undertake comprehensive searches for prior registered or unregistered trade marks, and offers a separate free app, TM Checker, for feedback on the likely success of an application Screening of candidate names and clearance of registered and unregistered marks, with regional or worldwide searches combining register and common law sources into one report and Corsearch analysts reviewing and filtering the results
Watch and alerts Saved searches in My Searches and in search spaces do not refresh on their own: IP Australia states their results only update when the searches are rerun, with a Rerun all searches button; search spaces are kept for 100 days after last access Automated Watch and analyst-reviewed Expert Watch across word and design marks in 240 jurisdictions and territories, LogoWatch for logos, a user-set similarity threshold and AI prioritisation of watch results
Reports and exports Result sets of up to 2,000 export as a Microsoft Excel document, results print as a plain print-friendly page, and the advanced view generates PDF reports; searches run in the advanced view are kept in a My Searches list Dashboards and interactive analytics in TrademarkNow, and one report for a regional or worldwide clearance search
Integrations and API Australian Trade Mark Search API with a quick search endpoint returning matching trade mark numbers, filterable by type, status and update date, and an endpoint returning the publicly available details of one trade mark; access is requested through the IP Australia developer portal and uses OAuth 2.0 client credentials Not stated
AI features No stated Yes
Deployment Browser-based Cloud (SaaS)
Onboarding Documentation and knowledge base Not stated

Compare more tools

Row where the values differ The small markers point at the lower number, the longer list or the stated feature. They describe the data, they are not a verdict.

The short version

Key Differences

  • Deployment Australian Trade Mark Search Browser-based Corsearch Cloud (SaaS)
  • AI features Australian Trade Mark Search No Corsearch Yes
  • Registers and countries covered Australian Trade Mark Search Registered and pending Australian trade marks, including trade marks registered with the International Bureau designating Australia, which are found by their international registration number Corsearch The vendor cites 190 searchable trademark registries and 240 jurisdictions and territories watched for new marks, within more than 1,000 trademark, company name, domain, design, pharma and common law databases
  • Word, phonetic and image search Australian Trade Mark Search Word searches with exact, prefix, suffix, part, stem, fuzzy and phonetic options, phrases with AND, OR, NOT, quotes and wildcards, image search by visual similarity from an uploaded PNG, JPG, GIF, BMP or SVG up to 8 MB, advanced image search with standard image constituent terms, and searches by number or range, owner, party, address for service, goods and services text, status, dates, type and flags such as non-use Corsearch Similarity search across phonetic, semantic and visual similarity in ExaMatch and NameCheck, logo and device search through LogoCheck image recognition, and an AI query assist that turns plain language into a search query
  • Goods, services and Nice classes Australian Trade Mark Search Searches across the 45 classes, with associated classes included by default; choosing Single limits the search to the classes entered Corsearch Clearance searches take goods and services, classes and jurisdictions as their criteria, and an AI Product Insights feature categorises products for filings

Every line is one datapoint from the table above, picked automatically. Nothing here is written text.

The trade-offs

Strengths and Limitations

Australian Trade Mark Search

Strengths

  • From IP Australia, the office that examines Australian applications
  • Phonetic, fuzzy and stem word searches for spelling and sound variants
  • Image search by visual similarity from an uploaded logo
  • Excel export of up to 2,000 results and a documented search API

Limitations

  • Covers the Australian register only; other countries need other databases
  • The official pages describe no watch or email alerts for new filings
  • The image search does not read words inside an image, so they have to be typed separately

Corsearch

Strengths

  • Analyst review on clearance searches and Expert Watch, with analysts averaging 15+ years of experience as stated by the vendor
  • Logo search and logo watching through image recognition
  • Clearance combines register and common law sources in one report
  • Trademark work and brand protection against counterfeits, gray markets and domain abuse from one vendor

Limitations

  • No prices are published; access starts with a demo request
  • The official pages describe no API and no integration with IP management systems
  • The vendor does not name which 190 registries are searched

Plans

Pricing

Australian Trade Mark Search

Price on Request

Visit site

What users say

Review Scores · opens after launch

Australian Trade Mark Search

Ease of use
Not rated yet
User interface
Not rated yet
Onboarding
Not rated yet
Support and service
Not rated yet
Value for money
Not rated yet
Features
Not rated yet

No reviews yet. Nothing has been published here yet, and no score is shown. How a review is checked before it appears is described below.

Corsearch

Ease of use
Not rated yet
User interface
Not rated yet
Onboarding
Not rated yet
Support and service
Not rated yet
Value for money
Not rated yet
Features
Not rated yet

No reviews yet. Nothing has been published here yet, and no score is shown. How a review is checked before it appears is described below.

How we check reviews

Before sending, the author has to confirm three things: that they have used the product themselves, that they work neither for the vendor nor for a competitor, and that nobody is paying them for the review. We also ask whether the vendor invited them to write it. That answer is required, either answer is accepted, and it stays with the review.

Every review is read by a person before it appears. An email address is required and is confirmed: we send a link to it, and a review does not reach us until the author opens that link, so a review has a sender who was reachable at least once rather than being anonymous. Where what somebody writes needs backing, we ask them for evidence that they used the product, and a review that does not get it is not published. We publish positive and negative reviews alike, we pay nothing and offer nothing for a review, and we accept none that was bought or incentivised.

What we cannot do is verify a purchase. There is no shop here and no account, so whether the author really used the tool rests on their own declaration, on whatever we ask them for, and on the plausibility of what they write. We say so rather than implying a check that does not exist.

A vendor cannot buy a review, and cannot have one removed or changed because they dislike it. We remove or edit a review only if it breaks our rules or the law, for example a false statement of fact. Paid placement has no effect on which reviews appear or on any score.

Read the full version on our methodology page

Where this comes from

Where this comes from

Australian Trade Mark Search https://ipaustralia.gov.au/trade-marks/search-existing-trade-marks · checked against the official source on 2026-11-08

Corsearch https://corsearch.com/ · checked against the official source on 2026-11-05

This table lists factual criteria taken from information the vendors publish themselves. For how we put it together, see the methodology.