Best for
Best for applicants and practitioners who want to search the Australian trade mark register themselves before filing with IP Australia.
Trademark Search & Monitoring Comparison
At a glance
Best for
Best for applicants and practitioners who want to search the Australian trade mark register themselves before filing with IP Australia.
Best for
Best for developers and law firms who build trademark search, screening and monitoring into their own software or AI assistants.
Cataleo does not name a winner. Both statements come from the vendors themselves.
| Criterion | Australian Trade Mark Search | Signa |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Not stated | From $99 / month Starter, billed yearly, with 20,000 credits a month (up to 2,000 searches) and $10 per 1,000 extra credits. Growth is $399 and Scale $999 a month, also billed yearly. The page offers monthly billing and says annual billing saves up to 25%, without stating the monthly amounts. A search costs 10 credits; credit costs for screening and watches are not yet announced. |
| Free trial | Not stated | Free tier with 10,000 credits on signup and 1,000 credits a month, up to 100 searches, no card required |
| Output | Lists of matching trade marks with full record details, an Excel export of up to 2,000 results, print-friendly pages and PDF reports | Not stated |
| API | Australian Trade Mark Search API with a quick search and a lookup by trade mark number, using OAuth 2.0 client credentials | Yes, a REST API with webhooks, a TypeScript SDK, agent skills and a hosted MCP server at api.signa.so/mcp |
| Hosting | Web app at search.ipaustralia.gov.au | Cloud: a web app, a REST API, a hosted MCP server and agent skills |
| Made in | Australia | Not stated |
| Registers and countries covered | Registered and pending Australian trade marks, including trade marks registered with the International Bureau designating Australia, which are found by their international registration number | 13 production offices with more than 40 million records: USPTO, EUIPO, WIPO, CIPO (Canada), IP Australia, IPOS (Singapore), UKIPO, INPI (France), Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, Spain and IMPI (Mexico), most synced daily and Canada and France weekly. DPMA, BOIP, JPO, KIPO, CNIPA and further offices are listed as planned. |
| Word, phonetic and image search | Word searches with exact, prefix, suffix, part, stem, fuzzy and phonetic options, phrases with AND, OR, NOT, quotes and wildcards, image search by visual similarity from an uploaded PNG, JPG, GIF, BMP or SVG up to 8 MB, advanced image search with standard image constituent terms, and searches by number or range, owner, party, address for service, goods and services text, status, dates, type and flags such as non-use | Text search through five similarity channels (identical, fuzzy, embedded, phonetic and look-alike characters), each hit labelled with its match tier and the channels that found it. Image search is listed as coming soon. |
| Goods, services and Nice classes | Searches across the 45 classes, with associated classes included by default; choosing Single limits the search to the classes entered | Search and watches filter by Nice class, and classification endpoints list classes and goods and services and suggest and validate goods and services wording |
| Clearance and conflict screening | A search of the register and not a clearance opinion: IP Australia says a trade marks attorney or lawyer can undertake comprehensive searches for prior registered or unregistered trade marks, and offers a separate free app, TM Checker, for feedback on the likely success of an application | A documented knockout and full similarity search workflow for clearance, a Compare Marks endpoint that scores a candidate against up to 10 selected conflicts, and a Screening product open to design partners during beta. The vendor states the results are informational data and not legal advice. |
| Watch and alerts | Saved searches in My Searches and in search spaces do not refresh on their own: IP Australia states their results only update when the searches are rerun, with a Rerun all searches button; search spaces are kept for 100 days after last access | In beta: five watch types (mark, portfolio, owner, class and similarity), alerts typically within a day of office publication by signed webhook or polling, and computed opposition deadlines on alerts in supported jurisdictions. Image watch is listed as coming soon. |
| Reports and exports | Result sets of up to 2,000 export as a Microsoft Excel document, results print as a plain print-friendly page, and the advanced view generates PDF reports; searches run in the advanced view are kept in a My Searches list | JSON responses from every endpoint and a monthly proof-of-monitoring attestation per watch, as a PDF and a JSON file |
| Integrations and API | Australian Trade Mark Search API with a quick search endpoint returning matching trade mark numbers, filterable by type, status and update date, and an endpoint returning the publicly available details of one trade mark; access is requested through the IP Australia developer portal and uses OAuth 2.0 client credentials | REST API with webhooks, a TypeScript SDK, and a hosted MCP server for Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor and VS Code; Microsoft Copilot is listed as coming soon |
| AI features | No | stated Yes |
| MCP-ready | No | stated Yes |
| Deployment | Browser-based | more entries Cloud (SaaS), Browser-based |
| Onboarding | Documentation and knowledge base | Documentation and knowledge base |
| Integrations | Not stated | Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, Cursor, Visual Studio Code |
Adds a column to the table, from the tools in this category.
Row where the values differ The small markers point at the lower number, the longer list or the stated feature. They describe the data, they are not a verdict.
The short version
Every line is one datapoint from the table above, picked automatically. Nothing here is written text.
The trade-offs
Australian Trade Mark Search
Strengths
Limitations
Signa
Strengths
Limitations
Plans
Australian Trade Mark Search
Price on Request
Visit siteSigna
What users say
Australian Trade Mark Search
No reviews yet. Nothing has been published here yet, and no score is shown. How a review is checked before it appears is described below.
Signa
No reviews yet. Nothing has been published here yet, and no score is shown. How a review is checked before it appears is described below.
Before sending, the author has to confirm three things: that they have used the product themselves, that they work neither for the vendor nor for a competitor, and that nobody is paying them for the review. We also ask whether the vendor invited them to write it. That answer is required, either answer is accepted, and it stays with the review.
Every review is read by a person before it appears. An email address is required and is confirmed: we send a link to it, and a review does not reach us until the author opens that link, so a review has a sender who was reachable at least once rather than being anonymous. Where what somebody writes needs backing, we ask them for evidence that they used the product, and a review that does not get it is not published. We publish positive and negative reviews alike, we pay nothing and offer nothing for a review, and we accept none that was bought or incentivised.
What we cannot do is verify a purchase. There is no shop here and no account, so whether the author really used the tool rests on their own declaration, on whatever we ask them for, and on the plausibility of what they write. We say so rather than implying a check that does not exist.
A vendor cannot buy a review, and cannot have one removed or changed because they dislike it. We remove or edit a review only if it breaks our rules or the law, for example a false statement of fact. Paid placement has no effect on which reviews appear or on any score.
Where this comes from
Australian Trade Mark Search https://ipaustralia.gov.au/trade-marks/search-existing-trade-marks · checked against the official source on 2026-11-08
Signa https://signa.so/ · checked against the official source on 2026-11-05
This table lists factual criteria taken from information the vendors publish themselves. For how we put it together, see the methodology.