Best for
Best for trademark attorneys and brand owners who order clearance reports and watches themselves, a few registers at a time.
Trademark Search & Monitoring Comparison
At a glance
Best for
Best for trademark attorneys and brand owners who order clearance reports and watches themselves, a few registers at a time.
Best for
Best for anyone who wants to check a US brand name or logo for free before filing it, and may want a law firm to file it afterwards.
Cataleo does not name a winner. Both statements come from the vendors themselves.
| Criterion | Markify | Trademarkia |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | lower value From $39 / year For a US Federal watch (USPTO and WIPO designating the US), all classes included. Comprehensive search reports are paid per report, from $89 for any single database and $169 for US Full. Prices exclude VAT and are listed at the same figures in euros, with combo discounts from 5% for two registers up to 30% for 7 to 25. | Free search; reports from $199 Comprehensive search reports are $199 (Federal), $299 (Federal and Common Law) and $1,599 (Global). Brand monitoring is $99 a quarter after the month or year included in a filing package; standalone monitoring is quoted on request with monthly, quarterly or annual billing. |
| Free trial | Free trial on request after creating an account; length not stated | Free trademark search |
| API | API and raw data access to 190 trademark databases, on request | Bulk data on request by email, which the vendor states it provides at no cost |
| Languages | Website in English, French, German, Spanish, Portuguese, Italian, Chinese and Japanese; goods and services translated into 40 languages | Not stated |
| Made in | Sweden (Stockholm) | Not stated |
| Registers and countries covered | 240 trademark databases: 190 country registers plus the 50 US states, with WIPO and Lisbon geographical indications among the international databases and daily data updates. Optional common law sources cover business names, domain names across 1,000+ TLDs, web search, images, social media and about 100 social network usernames. | Free search over 12 million+ US trademarks. The paid Global Comprehensive Search adds Canada, the United Kingdom, the European Community and WIPO, and filing is offered in 180+ countries. |
| Word, phonetic and image search | Word mark similarity search with relevance-ranked results, image search for design and figurative marks by algorithm or with analyst review using Vienna and US design codes, and Boolean search across trademark data fields including goods and services in ProSearch | Free word search with wildcards, owner search and an image search that takes an uploaded logo or a URL; comprehensive searches look for similar names, logos and slogans, including phonetic similarities |
| Goods, services and Nice classes | Comprehensive word searches include up to five classes plus identical results across all classes, each additional class 2.5% more; watches include all classes; goods and services can be keyword-filtered and are translated into 40 languages | Image search results can be filtered by class, status and filing date, and the site lists trademarks by class |
| Clearance and conflict screening | Comprehensive availability reports generated within minutes, with identical marks and dead marks in separate tabs, and analyst-driven reports in 2 business days (urgent) or 4 (standard). Image clearance runs by algorithm or with an analyst reviewing the results. | Comprehensive search reports in three packages (Federal, Federal and Common Law, Global), covering registered, unregistered and dead marks, with common law results from Google, Yahoo, Facebook, Wikipedia and Instagram and domain results; the page describes an attorney's opinion on the results and a video consultation |
| Watch and alerts | Weekly watch reports by email and online across up to 190 registers, all classes included, plus owner watch, goods and services watch and domain name watch across 1,000+ TLDs. Bulk watching from 50 watches with template automation. | Brand Monitoring scans trademark databases for new applications similar or identical to a monitored mark and sends a report naming the applicant, class and filing jurisdiction. Multiple marks can be monitored. |
| Reports and exports | PDF by email, and PDF, Word, RTF, HTML and Excel online, with custom branding, sorting, colour coding and sharing with colleagues inside or outside the company | Comprehensive search reports by email in PDF, RTF, Word, HTML or Excel |
| Integrations and API | API and raw data access to 190 trademark databases on request; the vendor asks for the application, the markets and the expected daily API calls and publishes no price or format | Bulk data on request by email; the vendor asks requesters to email rather than scrape the site |
| AI features | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS) | Cloud (SaaS) |
| Support | Email helpdesk, Phone | Email helpdesk, Phone |
Adds a column to the table, from the tools in this category.
Row where the values differ The small markers point at the lower number, the longer list or the stated feature. They describe the data, they are not a verdict.
The short version
Every line is one datapoint from the table above, picked automatically. Nothing here is written text.
The trade-offs
Markify
Strengths
Limitations
Trademarkia
Strengths
Limitations
Plans
Markify
Trademarkia
What users say
Markify
No reviews yet. Nothing has been published here yet, and no score is shown. How a review is checked before it appears is described below.
Trademarkia
No reviews yet. Nothing has been published here yet, and no score is shown. How a review is checked before it appears is described below.
Before sending, the author has to confirm three things: that they have used the product themselves, that they work neither for the vendor nor for a competitor, and that nobody is paying them for the review. We also ask whether the vendor invited them to write it. That answer is required, either answer is accepted, and it stays with the review.
Every review is read by a person before it appears. An email address is required and is confirmed: we send a link to it, and a review does not reach us until the author opens that link, so a review has a sender who was reachable at least once rather than being anonymous. Where what somebody writes needs backing, we ask them for evidence that they used the product, and a review that does not get it is not published. We publish positive and negative reviews alike, we pay nothing and offer nothing for a review, and we accept none that was bought or incentivised.
What we cannot do is verify a purchase. There is no shop here and no account, so whether the author really used the tool rests on their own declaration, on whatever we ask them for, and on the plausibility of what they write. We say so rather than implying a check that does not exist.
A vendor cannot buy a review, and cannot have one removed or changed because they dislike it. We remove or edit a review only if it breaks our rules or the law, for example a false statement of fact. Paid placement has no effect on which reviews appear or on any score.
Where this comes from
Markify https://www.markify.com/ · checked against the official source on 2026-11-05
Trademarkia https://www.trademarkia.com/ · checked against the official source on 2026-11-05
This table lists factual criteria taken from information the vendors publish themselves. For how we put it together, see the methodology.