Best for
Best for organizations that want cloud video management for the cameras they already have, across several locations.
Video Surveillance & VMS Comparison
At a glance
Best for
Best for organizations that want cloud video management for the cameras they already have, across several locations.
Best for
Best for organizations that want to replace recorders and servers with cameras managed from one cloud platform across many sites.
Cataleo does not name a winner. Both statements come from the vendors themselves.
| Criterion | Eagle Eye Cloud VMS | Verkada |
|---|---|---|
| Free trial | Free trial offered | 30-day trial with one device and full access to the Command platform |
| API | Yes, the Video API Platform | Yes, REST APIs for the Command platform and Verkada devices, plus out-of-the-box integrations |
| Hosting | Video stored in Eagle Eye's own data centers, or on site on an Eagle Eye CMVR with cloud management | Hybrid: video is stored on the camera and in Verkada's cloud, managed in the Command platform |
| Camera compatibility (ONVIF, RTSP, vendor SDKs) | Works with more than 7,500 cameras, and the vendor states it can capture video from virtually any ONVIF-conformant camera; a Supported Device List names the models | Verkada's own cameras (dome, mini, bullet, fisheye, multisensor, PTZ, remote, thermal); non-Verkada cameras on the compatibility list can be bridged in through Command Connector, with limited support for some features |
| Recording and storage | Cloud plans with retention from 7 days to 5 years; an on-premise plan stores video on an Eagle Eye CMVR, with retention set by its storage; video encrypted in transmission and at rest | Every Verkada camera includes guaranteed onboard storage of 30 to 365 days; Command Connector appliances store up to 8, 16 or 32 TB |
| AI video analytics | AI detection of security events, people, vehicles, suspicious license plates and guns, PPE compliance checks, and natural-language search | AI-powered search including face search and reverse image search, AI-powered alerts such as line crossing and camera tampering, and operational analytics such as movement patterns and wait times |
| Deployment (on-premise, cloud, hybrid) | Cloud plans need an on-site Eagle Eye Bridge or CMVR; the on-premise plan keeps video on a CMVR while management stays in the cloud | Hybrid cloud: processing and storage on the camera and in the cloud, with no NVRs or servers; Command Connector bridges existing cameras on site |
| Multi-site management | Cameras at all locations viewed remotely from a phone or computer, grouped by site, location or purpose | The vendor states the hybrid cloud design supports thousands of sites, managed remotely in Command |
| Camera health monitoring and alerts | Real-time notifications for camera status, alongside alerts for motion and AI detections such as gun detection | Proactive notifications about system and device health; over-the-air software and firmware updates for Verkada cameras |
| Integrations and API | Video API Platform and a technology partner programme | REST APIs for the Command platform and Verkada devices, and an integration partner directory |
| AI features | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | more entries Cloud (SaaS), On-premise | Cloud (SaaS) |
Adds a column to the table, from the tools in this category.
Row where the values differ The small markers point at the lower number, the longer list or the stated feature. They describe the data, they are not a verdict.
The short version
Every line is one datapoint from the table above, picked automatically. Nothing here is written text.
The trade-offs
Eagle Eye Cloud VMS
Strengths
Limitations
Verkada
Strengths
Limitations
Plans
Eagle Eye Cloud VMS
Price on Request
Visit siteVerkada
Price on Request
Visit siteWhat users say
Eagle Eye Cloud VMS
No reviews yet. Nothing has been published here yet, and no score is shown. How a review is checked before it appears is described below.
Verkada
No reviews yet. Nothing has been published here yet, and no score is shown. How a review is checked before it appears is described below.
Before sending, the author has to confirm three things: that they have used the product themselves, that they work neither for the vendor nor for a competitor, and that nobody is paying them for the review. We also ask whether the vendor invited them to write it. That answer is required, either answer is accepted, and it stays with the review.
Every review is read by a person before it appears. An email address is required and is confirmed: we send a link to it, and a review does not reach us until the author opens that link, so a review has a sender who was reachable at least once rather than being anonymous. Where what somebody writes needs backing, we ask them for evidence that they used the product, and a review that does not get it is not published. We publish positive and negative reviews alike, we pay nothing and offer nothing for a review, and we accept none that was bought or incentivised.
What we cannot do is verify a purchase. There is no shop here and no account, so whether the author really used the tool rests on their own declaration, on whatever we ask them for, and on the plausibility of what they write. We say so rather than implying a check that does not exist.
A vendor cannot buy a review, and cannot have one removed or changed because they dislike it. We remove or edit a review only if it breaks our rules or the law, for example a false statement of fact. Paid placement has no effect on which reviews appear or on any score.
Where this comes from
Eagle Eye Cloud VMS https://www.een.com/ · no check date recorded yet
Verkada https://www.verkada.com/security-cameras/ · no check date recorded yet
This table lists factual criteria taken from information the vendors publish themselves. For how we put it together, see the methodology.