Best for
Best for marketing teams that want interactive AMP emails, where forms and surveys run inside the inbox, backed by AI drafting and automation.
- Small and mid-sized
- Enterprise
Email Marketing Comparison
At a glance
Best for
Best for marketing teams that want interactive AMP emails, where forms and surveys run inside the inbox, backed by AI drafting and automation.
Best for
Best for ecommerce stores that want email, SMS and web push in one platform, with ready integrations for Shopify, BigCommerce and WooCommerce.
Cataleo does not name a winner. Both statements come from the vendors themselves.
| Criterion | Mailmodo | Omnisend |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | From $149 / month Lite plan, billed annually, for 500 contacts and 2,000 email credits per month; higher plans add contacts and credits. | lower value From $16 / month Standard plan for up to 500 contacts, billed monthly; the price scales with the number of contacts. A free plan is also available. |
| Free trial | Free trial available | Free plan for up to 250 contacts and 500 emails per month |
| API | Yes, an API, with integrations for Zapier, HubSpot, Customer.io and Clevertap | Yes, API access on all plans |
| Hosting | Cloud (SaaS) | Cloud (SaaS) |
| Made in | United States | Not stated |
| Campaign types | Yes, email newsletters and bulk campaigns, AMP interactive emails, and transactional email | Yes, email campaigns, SMS and MMS, and web push notifications |
| Automation and journeys | Yes, email sequences and prebuilt automation templates | Yes, automation workflows across email, SMS and push |
| Segmentation and personalisation | Yes, contact segmentation, with AI segment generation | Yes, unlimited segmentation and contact profiles on all plans |
| Templates and editor | Yes, a drag-and-drop editor with AI template and subject-line generation and a brand kit | Yes, a drag-and-drop editor with email templates |
| Deliverability and testing | Yes, a managed deliverability service: Mailmodo monitors its own sending IPs, keeps bulk and transactional mail on separate sending streams, provides its own high-reputation SMTP, and its in-house experts run a deliverability audit of email health, performance and domain reputation, then plan domain warm-up and safe volume increases | Yes, A/B testing on all plans |
| Ecommerce and CRM data | Yes, integrations with HubSpot, Customer.io and Clevertap for CRM data | Yes, ecommerce integrations for Shopify, BigCommerce, WooCommerce, WordPress and Wix |
| Integrations and API | Yes, an API, plus integrations for Zapier, HubSpot, Customer.io and Clevertap | Yes, API access on all plans |
| AI features | Yes | Yes |
| MCP-ready | No | stated Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS), Browser-based | Cloud (SaaS), Browser-based |
| Support | Email helpdesk, Chat, Phone | Email helpdesk, Chat, 24/7 |
| Onboarding | Documentation and knowledge base | more entries Documentation and knowledge base, Guided onboarding, Personal consulting |
| Company size | Small and mid-sized, Enterprise | Small and mid-sized, Enterprise |
| Integrations | more entries HubSpot, Customer.io, Clevertap, Zapier, Make, Google Sheets, Mailchimp, Shopify, Segment, Mixpanel, Twilio, Zoom, Google Calendar, Intercom, Zendesk, MoEngage, WebEngage | Shopify, Shopify Plus, BigCommerce, WooCommerce, WordPress, Wix, Shoplazza, Ecwid |
Adds a column to the table, from the tools in this category.
Row where the values differ The small markers point at the lower number, the longer list or the stated feature. They describe the data, they are not a verdict.
The short version
Every line is one datapoint from the table above, picked automatically. Nothing here is written text.
The trade-offs
Mailmodo
Strengths
Limitations
Omnisend
Strengths
Limitations
Plans
Mailmodo
Omnisend
What users say
Mailmodo
No reviews yet. Nothing has been published here yet, and no score is shown. How a review is checked before it appears is described below.
Omnisend
No reviews yet. Nothing has been published here yet, and no score is shown. How a review is checked before it appears is described below.
Before sending, the author has to confirm three things: that they have used the product themselves, that they work neither for the vendor nor for a competitor, and that nobody is paying them for the review. We also ask whether the vendor invited them to write it. That answer is required, either answer is accepted, and it stays with the review.
Every review is read by a person before it appears. An email address is required and is confirmed: we send a link to it, and a review does not reach us until the author opens that link, so a review has a sender who was reachable at least once rather than being anonymous. Where what somebody writes needs backing, we ask them for evidence that they used the product, and a review that does not get it is not published. We publish positive and negative reviews alike, we pay nothing and offer nothing for a review, and we accept none that was bought or incentivised.
What we cannot do is verify a purchase. There is no shop here and no account, so whether the author really used the tool rests on their own declaration, on whatever we ask them for, and on the plausibility of what they write. We say so rather than implying a check that does not exist.
A vendor cannot buy a review, and cannot have one removed or changed because they dislike it. We remove or edit a review only if it breaks our rules or the law, for example a false statement of fact. Paid placement has no effect on which reviews appear or on any score.
Where this comes from
Mailmodo https://www.mailmodo.com · checked against the official source on 2026-08-22
Omnisend https://www.omnisend.com · checked against the official source on 2026-08-20
This table lists factual criteria taken from information the vendors publish themselves. For how we put it together, see the methodology.