Best for
Best for UK security guarding companies that want rota, officer compliance records and billing in one system priced per worked officer.
Resource Planning Comparison
At a glance
Best for
Best for UK security guarding companies that want rota, officer compliance records and billing in one system priced per worked officer.
Best for
Best for engineering, consulting and IT teams that want a dedicated booking and utilisation tool alongside an existing project system, and want to pay only for the modules they use.
Cataleo does not name a winner. Both statements come from the vendors themselves.
| Criterion | BOOK ON | eResource Scheduler |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | From £2.95 / worked officer / month One rate with all platform features included. Each officer who worked at least one shift in the calendar month is counted once; controllers, managers and office users are not counted. No VAT is added while the vendor is not VAT registered. | From $5 / resource / month Core Scheduling module on annual billing, $6.25 billed monthly. Timesheets, financials, forecasting and SSO are separate modules priced per resource on top. |
| Free trial | First partial calendar month free, no credit card required; the next complete calendar month is the first chargeable one | 30-day trial, no credit card, extensions on request |
| API | Not stated | Yes, an open REST API included in the core Scheduling module |
| Hosting | Not stated | Cloud, with a self-hosted build for organisations with on-premise requirements |
| Made in | United Kingdom | India (Enbraun Technologies, Jaipur) |
| Resource planning | Yes, shifts assigned to employees or subcontractor officers by client and site, a client roster and an officer roster over the same shifts, counters for unassigned and unconfirmed shifts, and a cover search by postcode and radius filtered by licence type, vetting status, certificates, work permit and transport | Yes, one pool across roles, locations and departments covering people, equipment and rooms, with drag-and-drop scheduling, bulk edits, recurring bookings, per-resource working hours, shifts and time zones, and skill matching that ranks candidates by match score |
| Task planning | Shift-based: each shift is set by client, site, day and start and end time, added one by one, imported from Excel or repeated with Copy Shifts and Copy Roster, and confirmed shifts appear in the officer app | Bookings are made against projects rather than a task breakdown; the product schedules who works when, not how the work is split up |
| Time tracking | Yes, book on and book off from the officer app with time and position recorded against the rostered shift, or by the control room from the roster; those records become the timesheet, with planned hours shown next to hours worked | Yes, but as a separately priced Timesheets module that records actual hours against projects and sets them against what was planned |
| Reporting and controlling | Yes, 70 reports in 13 families exported as Excel, CSV and PDF, client reports on attendance, calls, patrols and invoices, and a finance dashboard with revenue, cost, profit and margin | Yes, live dashboards plus customisable reports on utilisation, availability, resource gaps and forecast demand, with cost, revenue and profit reporting in the separate Financial module |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS), Browser-based | more entries Cloud (SaaS), Browser-based, On-premise |
| Support | Phone, Email helpdesk | Email helpdesk, Chat |
| Onboarding | Guided onboarding | more entries Documentation and knowledge base, Video tutorials, Guided onboarding |
| Company size | Not stated | Small and mid-sized, Enterprise |
| Integrations | Not stated | Jira, Slack |
Adds a column to the table, from the tools in this category.
Row where the values differ The small markers point at the lower number, the longer list or the stated feature. They describe the data, they are not a verdict.
The short version
Every line is one datapoint from the table above, picked automatically. Nothing here is written text.
The trade-offs
BOOK ON
Strengths
Limitations
eResource Scheduler
Strengths
Limitations
Plans
BOOK ON
eResource Scheduler
What users say
BOOK ON
No reviews yet. Nothing has been published here yet, and no score is shown. How a review is checked before it appears is described below.
eResource Scheduler
No reviews yet. Nothing has been published here yet, and no score is shown. How a review is checked before it appears is described below.
Before sending, the author has to confirm three things: that they have used the product themselves, that they work neither for the vendor nor for a competitor, and that nobody is paying them for the review. We also ask whether the vendor invited them to write it. That answer is required, either answer is accepted, and it stays with the review.
Every review is read by a person before it appears. An email address is required and is confirmed: we send a link to it, and a review does not reach us until the author opens that link, so a review has a sender who was reachable at least once rather than being anonymous. Where what somebody writes needs backing, we ask them for evidence that they used the product, and a review that does not get it is not published. We publish positive and negative reviews alike, we pay nothing and offer nothing for a review, and we accept none that was bought or incentivised.
What we cannot do is verify a purchase. There is no shop here and no account, so whether the author really used the tool rests on their own declaration, on whatever we ask them for, and on the plausibility of what they write. We say so rather than implying a check that does not exist.
A vendor cannot buy a review, and cannot have one removed or changed because they dislike it. We remove or edit a review only if it breaks our rules or the law, for example a false statement of fact. Paid placement has no effect on which reviews appear or on any score.
Where this comes from
BOOK ON https://bookonsolutions.com/ · checked against the official source on 2026-11-04
eResource Scheduler https://www.eresourcescheduler.com · no check date recorded yet
This table lists factual criteria taken from information the vendors publish themselves. For how we put it together, see the methodology.