CataleoSoftware
For Vendors

Resource Planning Comparison

Celoxis vs. Float

At a glance

At a glance

Celoxis

Best for

Best for professional services and IT organisations that want portfolio, resourcing and timesheets in one system, and for those that need it installed on their own servers.

  • Small and mid-sized
  • Enterprise

Float

Best for

Best for agencies and teams whose main need is clear capacity planning and utilization.

  • Small and mid-sized
  • Enterprise

Cataleo does not name a winner. Both statements come from the vendors themselves.

Full Comparison

Criterion Celoxis Float
Starting price From $10 / user / month Core tier, prepaid annually. Every plan requires a minimum of five full-access users; the higher tiers price team-member and timesheet users below a full seat. lower value From $7 / scheduled person / month Starter, billed annually. Pro $12 per scheduled person and month, Enterprise on request. Monthly billing is also offered.
Free trial 14-day trial with sample data 30-day free trial of the Pro plan, no credit card required
API Yes, a documented web-based REST API alongside more than 400 prebuilt integrations Not stated
Hosting Cloud on AWS in the United States and Ireland, audited against ISO 27001 and SOC 2 Type 2, or on-premise on Linux, Windows or macOS with SQL Server 2016+, Oracle 11g/12c or PostgreSQL 12+ Not stated
Made in India (Celoxis Technologies, Pune) Australia
Resource planning Yes, allocation by availability, demand and skills, with capacity planning, multiple locations and shifts, holiday and exception handling and instant overload alerts Yes, drag-and-drop scheduling with capacity forecasting, utilization tracking and PTO planning
Task planning Yes, plans that schedule automatically around time off, delays and changing priorities, with inter-project dependencies, critical path, baselines and earned value analysis Yes, with drag-and-drop task scheduling
Time tracking Yes, a built-in timesheet module with inbuilt timers, multi-level approvals, automatic reminders and configurable policies Yes, on the Pro plan and above, with pre-filled timesheets
Reporting and controlling Yes, custom drill-down charts and shared dashboards with PDF export and scheduled email delivery, plus financials covering margins, revenue forecasting and budget spend Yes, utilization and project budgets with margin tracking
AI features stated Yes No
MCP-ready No stated Yes
Deployment more entries Cloud (SaaS), Browser-based, On-premise Cloud (SaaS), Browser-based
Support Community forum Chat
Onboarding Documentation and knowledge base, Video tutorials, Live online demos and webinars Documentation and knowledge base, Video tutorials, Guided onboarding
Company size Small and mid-sized, Enterprise Small and mid-sized, Enterprise
Integrations more entries Jira, Salesforce, QuickBooks Online, Microsoft Project, Microsoft Excel, Slack, Zapier, Google Drive, Google Sheets, Google Forms, Trello, GitHub, Zendesk, Freshdesk, Harvest, Mailchimp, SurveyMonkey, Evernote, Microsoft Active Directory, Okta, OneLogin, SAML 2.0, iCal Aprimo, Asana, Basecamp, ClickUp, Google Calendar, Outlook Calendar, HubSpot, Jira, Karbon, Slack, Zapier, Claude, ChatGPT

Compare more tools

Row where the values differ The small markers point at the lower number, the longer list or the stated feature. They describe the data, they are not a verdict.

The short version

Key Differences

  • Starting price Celoxis From $10 / user / month Float From $7 / scheduled person / month
  • Free trial Celoxis 14-day trial with sample data Float 30-day free trial of the Pro plan, no credit card required
  • Deployment Celoxis Cloud (SaaS), Browser-based, On-premise Float Cloud (SaaS), Browser-based
  • Support Celoxis Community forum Float Chat
  • Made in Celoxis India (Celoxis Technologies, Pune) Float Australia

Every line is one datapoint from the table above, picked automatically. Nothing here is written text.

The trade-offs

Strengths and Limitations

Celoxis

Strengths

  • One of the few tools in this category that can be installed on your own servers instead of taken as a hosted service
  • Team-member and timesheet-only users cost less than a full seat on the higher tiers, so read-only and time-entry access does not carry full price
  • Resourcing accounts for locations, shifts, holidays and exceptions rather than assuming one shared working week

Limitations

  • Every plan requires at least five full-access users, so the smallest teams cannot buy in
  • The on-premise price is not published and comes from a quote
  • List prices are prepaid annually; the page prices no monthly-billed option

Float

Strengths

  • Drag-and-drop scheduling
  • Capacity forecasting and utilization
  • Built-in time tracking and budgets

Limitations

  • Scheduling-first, lighter financials than a full PSA
  • No native invoicing

Plans

Pricing

Celoxis

  • Core $10 / standard user / month Prepaid annually. Minimum five full-access users.
  • Essentials $25 / standard user / month Prepaid annually. Team-member users $18, timesheet users $12. Minimum five full-access users.
  • Professional $35 / standard user / month Prepaid annually. Team-member users $24, timesheet users $12. Minimum five full-access users.
  • Business $45 / standard user / month Prepaid annually. Team-member users $29, timesheet users $14. Minimum five full-access users.
  • Enterprise Not stated Custom pricing on request.
Visit site

Float

  • Starter $7 Per scheduled person and month, billed annually.
  • Pro $12 Per scheduled person and month, billed annually. Adds time tracking.
  • Enterprise Custom On request, for teams of 100 seats or more.
Visit site

What users say

Review Scores · opens after launch

Celoxis

Ease of use
Not rated yet
User interface
Not rated yet
Onboarding
Not rated yet
Support and service
Not rated yet
Value for money
Not rated yet
Features
Not rated yet

No reviews yet. Nothing has been published here yet, and no score is shown. How a review is checked before it appears is described below.

Float

Ease of use
Not rated yet
User interface
Not rated yet
Onboarding
Not rated yet
Support and service
Not rated yet
Value for money
Not rated yet
Features
Not rated yet

No reviews yet. Nothing has been published here yet, and no score is shown. How a review is checked before it appears is described below.

How we check reviews

Before sending, the author has to confirm three things: that they have used the product themselves, that they work neither for the vendor nor for a competitor, and that nobody is paying them for the review. We also ask whether the vendor invited them to write it. That answer is required, either answer is accepted, and it stays with the review.

Every review is read by a person before it appears. An email address is required and is confirmed: we send a link to it, and a review does not reach us until the author opens that link, so a review has a sender who was reachable at least once rather than being anonymous. Where what somebody writes needs backing, we ask them for evidence that they used the product, and a review that does not get it is not published. We publish positive and negative reviews alike, we pay nothing and offer nothing for a review, and we accept none that was bought or incentivised.

What we cannot do is verify a purchase. There is no shop here and no account, so whether the author really used the tool rests on their own declaration, on whatever we ask them for, and on the plausibility of what they write. We say so rather than implying a check that does not exist.

A vendor cannot buy a review, and cannot have one removed or changed because they dislike it. We remove or edit a review only if it breaks our rules or the law, for example a false statement of fact. Paid placement has no effect on which reviews appear or on any score.

Read the full version on our methodology page

Where this comes from

Where this comes from

Celoxis https://www.celoxis.com · no check date recorded yet

Float https://www.float.com · checked against the official source on 2026-09-30

This table lists factual criteria taken from information the vendors publish themselves. For how we put it together, see the methodology.