Best for
Best for engineering, consulting and IT teams that want a dedicated booking and utilisation tool alongside an existing project system, and want to pay only for the modules they use.
- Small and mid-sized
- Enterprise
Resource Planning Comparison
At a glance
Best for
Best for engineering, consulting and IT teams that want a dedicated booking and utilisation tool alongside an existing project system, and want to pay only for the modules they use.
Best for
Best for enterprise PMOs forecasting capacity across a portfolio whose project plans already live in several different tools.
Cataleo does not name a winner. Both statements come from the vendors themselves.
| Criterion | eResource Scheduler | Tempus Resource |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | From $5 / resource / month Core Scheduling module on annual billing, $6.25 billed monthly. Timesheets, financials, forecasting and SSO are separate modules priced per resource on top. | Quote-based ProSymmetry states that pricing is tailored to planning needs, team size and implementation goals; no price list is published. |
| Free trial | 30-day trial, no credit card, extensions on request | 30-day free trial, covering Tempus Resource, Tempus Portfolio or both |
| API | Yes, an open REST API included in the core Scheduling module | Yes, a REST API included for all users at no additional cost |
| Hosting | Cloud, with a self-hosted build for organisations with on-premise requirements | Cloud or on-premises |
| Made in | India (Enbraun Technologies, Jaipur) | United States (ProSymmetry, Beachwood, Ohio) |
| Resource planning | Yes, one pool across roles, locations and departments covering people, equipment and rooms, with drag-and-drop scheduling, bulk edits, recurring bookings, per-resource working hours, shifts and time zones, and skill matching that ranks candidates by match score | Yes, capacity and demand planning from a central resource catalogue with custom attributes, heat maps for over- and under-allocation by role, department or skill, forecasting six to thirty-six months out, and What-If resequencing of the portfolio |
| Task planning | Bookings are made against projects rather than a task breakdown; the product schedules who works when, not how the work is split up | No task planning of its own; project plans come from connected tools such as Microsoft Project, Jira and Smartsheet |
| Time tracking | Yes, but as a separately priced Timesheets module that records actual hours against projects and sets them against what was planned | Yes, timesheets are part of the platform, so planned time can be compared against actual time spent |
| Reporting and controlling | Yes, live dashboards plus customisable reports on utilisation, availability, resource gaps and forecast demand, with cost, revenue and profit reporting in the separate Financial module | Yes, standard reporting plus the Insight+ module for dynamic dashboards, and audit logging that records the before and after of every change |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS), Browser-based, On-premise | Cloud (SaaS), Browser-based, On-premise |
| Support | Email helpdesk, Chat | Phone, Email helpdesk |
| Onboarding | more entries Documentation and knowledge base, Video tutorials, Guided onboarding | Guided onboarding |
| Company size | more entries Small and mid-sized, Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Integrations | Jira, Slack | more entries Workday, SAP SuccessFactors, SAP, Oracle, ServiceNow, Jira, Microsoft Project, Microsoft Dynamics, Microsoft Azure DevOps, Microsoft SharePoint, Microsoft Excel, Smartsheet, Salesforce, PeopleSoft, Wolters Kluwer |
Adds a column to the table, from the tools in this category.
Row where the values differ The small markers point at the lower number, the longer list or the stated feature. They describe the data, they are not a verdict.
The short version
Every line is one datapoint from the table above, picked automatically. Nothing here is written text.
The trade-offs
eResource Scheduler
Strengths
Limitations
Tempus Resource
Strengths
Limitations
Plans
eResource Scheduler
Tempus Resource
What users say
eResource Scheduler
No reviews yet. Nothing has been published here yet, and no score is shown. How a review is checked before it appears is described below.
Tempus Resource
No reviews yet. Nothing has been published here yet, and no score is shown. How a review is checked before it appears is described below.
Before sending, the author has to confirm three things: that they have used the product themselves, that they work neither for the vendor nor for a competitor, and that nobody is paying them for the review. We also ask whether the vendor invited them to write it. That answer is required, either answer is accepted, and it stays with the review.
Every review is read by a person before it appears. An email address is required and is confirmed: we send a link to it, and a review does not reach us until the author opens that link, so a review has a sender who was reachable at least once rather than being anonymous. Where what somebody writes needs backing, we ask them for evidence that they used the product, and a review that does not get it is not published. We publish positive and negative reviews alike, we pay nothing and offer nothing for a review, and we accept none that was bought or incentivised.
What we cannot do is verify a purchase. There is no shop here and no account, so whether the author really used the tool rests on their own declaration, on whatever we ask them for, and on the plausibility of what they write. We say so rather than implying a check that does not exist.
A vendor cannot buy a review, and cannot have one removed or changed because they dislike it. We remove or edit a review only if it breaks our rules or the law, for example a false statement of fact. Paid placement has no effect on which reviews appear or on any score.
Where this comes from
eResource Scheduler https://www.eresourcescheduler.com · no check date recorded yet
Tempus Resource https://www.prosymmetry.com/product/tempus-resource · no check date recorded yet
This table lists factual criteria taken from information the vendors publish themselves. For how we put it together, see the methodology.