Best for
Best for PMOs that balance capacity across many teams while those teams keep working in their own tools.
- Enterprise
Resource Planning Comparison
At a glance
Best for
Best for PMOs that balance capacity across many teams while those teams keep working in their own tools.
Resource Management by Smartsheet
Best for
Best for professional services and agency teams already on Smartsheet that need capacity planning and utilization reporting.
Cataleo does not name a winner. Both statements come from the vendors themselves.
| Criterion | Meisterplan | Resource Management by Smartsheet |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | From $720 / month The smallest package is the Basic edition for 50 resources, at $720 per month or $7,200 per year. Users are free and unlimited, so only the people booked to projects count. Packages run up to 1,000 resources; above that the vendor quotes. | Price on request Smartsheet shows no figure for the add-on and asks for a demo request instead. |
| Free trial | 30 days, no credit card required, with the functionality of the Pro Edition | Not stated |
| Users | Users are free and unlimited; licensing counts resources, where one full-time equivalent equals one resource | Not stated |
| API | Yes, REST API plus a separate reporting API and an MCP endpoint | Yes, a REST API against the Resource Management database |
| Hosting | Cloud | Not stated |
| Made in | Germany (itdesign, Tuebingen) | Not stated |
| Resource planning | Yes, capacity planning at portfolio level with a Team Planner histogram, role-based staffing by availability and what-if scenarios | Yes, matching people to projects by skills and availability, workload and capacity views, staffing forecasts and what-if scenario planning |
| Task planning | No, planning stops at the allocation of people to projects; task detail stays in the connected tools | At phase level: a project splits into phases with their own dates, budget and bill rates, work items and tasks sit under a phase in the worklist, and the schedule is an interactive timeline where phase and assignment bars are dragged to new dates. Phases carry no dependencies between them |
| Time tracking | No time entry of its own; actual time worked can be imported from Jira nightly and compared with planned allocations | Yes, optional, in half-day, hours-and-minutes or itemized modes, with expenses against the project budget and an approval step |
| Reporting and controlling | Yes, portfolio dashboards, financial planning and a reporting API for Power BI, Tableau and Looker Studio | Yes, pre-built utilization, time and fees, expense and budget reports |
| AI features | stated Yes | No |
| MCP-ready | stated Yes | No |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS), Browser-based | Cloud (SaaS), Browser-based |
| Support | Email helpdesk, Phone | Email helpdesk, Community forum |
| Onboarding | more entries Documentation and knowledge base, Guided onboarding, Live online demos and webinars, Personal consulting | Documentation and knowledge base, Personal consulting |
| Company size | Enterprise | more entries Small and mid-sized, Enterprise |
| Integrations | more entries Jira, Asana, ClickUp, monday.com, Trello, Wrike, Todoist, Microsoft Azure DevOps, Microsoft Planner, ServiceNow, Smartsheet, Salesforce, Microsoft Teams, Slack, Microsoft Outlook, Microsoft Power BI, Tableau, Google Looker Studio, Microsoft Excel, Zapier | Smartsheet, Zapier, QuickBooks, Google Calendar, Outlook, Apple iCloud |
Adds a column to the table, from the tools in this category.
Row where the values differ The small markers point at the lower number, the longer list or the stated feature. They describe the data, they are not a verdict.
The short version
Every line is one datapoint from the table above, picked automatically. Nothing here is written text.
The trade-offs
Meisterplan
Strengths
Limitations
Resource Management by Smartsheet
Strengths
Limitations
Plans
Meisterplan
Resource Management by Smartsheet
What users say
Meisterplan
No reviews yet. Nothing has been published here yet, and no score is shown. How a review is checked before it appears is described below.
Resource Management by Smartsheet
No reviews yet. Nothing has been published here yet, and no score is shown. How a review is checked before it appears is described below.
Before sending, the author has to confirm three things: that they have used the product themselves, that they work neither for the vendor nor for a competitor, and that nobody is paying them for the review. We also ask whether the vendor invited them to write it. That answer is required, either answer is accepted, and it stays with the review.
Every review is read by a person before it appears. An email address is required and is confirmed: we send a link to it, and a review does not reach us until the author opens that link, so a review has a sender who was reachable at least once rather than being anonymous. Where what somebody writes needs backing, we ask them for evidence that they used the product, and a review that does not get it is not published. We publish positive and negative reviews alike, we pay nothing and offer nothing for a review, and we accept none that was bought or incentivised.
What we cannot do is verify a purchase. There is no shop here and no account, so whether the author really used the tool rests on their own declaration, on whatever we ask them for, and on the plausibility of what they write. We say so rather than implying a check that does not exist.
A vendor cannot buy a review, and cannot have one removed or changed because they dislike it. We remove or edit a review only if it breaks our rules or the law, for example a false statement of fact. Paid placement has no effect on which reviews appear or on any score.
Where this comes from
Meisterplan https://www.meisterplan.com · no check date recorded yet
Resource Management by Smartsheet https://www.smartsheet.com/platform/resource-management · no check date recorded yet
This table lists factual criteria taken from information the vendors publish themselves. For how we put it together, see the methodology.