Best for
Best for marketing and operations teams that need structured project workflows and cross-team goals.
- Freelancers
- Small and mid-sized
- Enterprise
Project Management Comparison
At a glance
Best for
Best for marketing and operations teams that need structured project workflows and cross-team goals.
Best for
Best for resource-heavy and creative teams that need capacity planning and proofing.
Cataleo does not name a winner. Both statements come from the vendors themselves.
| Criterion | Asana | Wrike |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free; Starter from $10.99 / user / month Billed annually, or $13.49 per user and month billed monthly. Advanced $24.99 per user and month billed annually ($30.49 monthly), Enterprise on request. The free Personal plan covers up to 2 users. | Free; Team from ~$9.80 / user / month Business ~$24.80 per user and month, Enterprise and Pinnacle on request. The free tier is limited. |
| Free trial | Free Personal plan for up to 2 users | Free tier plus trial |
| Hosting | Cloud on Amazon Web Services; no on-premises version | Not stated |
| Made in | USA | USA |
| Task planning | Yes, with list, board, calendar, timeline and Gantt views | Yes, with custom workflows |
| Resource planning | Yes, resource management within a portfolio from Advanced; organization-wide workload and capacity planning on Enterprise | Yes, native resource management and capacity planning |
| Time tracking | Yes, from Advanced, comparing estimated with actual time per task. Timesheets for billable and non-billable hours and project budgets are an Enterprise add-on; the free plan syncs with time tracking tools through integrations | Yes, native |
| Reporting and controlling | Yes, reporting dashboards from Starter; Goals and Portfolios from Advanced | Yes |
| Integrations and API | Yes, APIs documented in the Asana Developer Guide, 100+ free integrations and an official MCP server | Yes, integrations |
| AI features | Yes | Yes |
| MCP-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS), Browser-based | Cloud (SaaS), Browser-based |
| Support | Email helpdesk, Community forum | more entries Email helpdesk, Chat, Phone, Community forum |
| Onboarding | Documentation and knowledge base, Video tutorials, Live online demos and webinars, Guided onboarding, Personal consulting | Documentation and knowledge base, Video tutorials, Live online demos and webinars, Guided onboarding, Personal consulting |
| Company size | more entries Freelancers, Small and mid-sized, Enterprise | Small and mid-sized, Enterprise |
| Integrations | Slack, Microsoft Teams, Google Workspace, Salesforce, Zoom, Zapier | Slack, Microsoft Teams, Google Workspace, Salesforce, Adobe Creative Cloud, Jira |
Adds a column to the table, from the tools in this category.
Row where the values differ The small markers point at the lower number, the longer list or the stated feature. They describe the data, they are not a verdict.
The short version
Every line is one datapoint from the table above, picked automatically. Nothing here is written text.
The trade-offs
Asana
Strengths
Limitations
Wrike
Strengths
Limitations
Plans
Asana
Wrike
What users say
Asana
No reviews yet. Nothing has been published here yet, and no score is shown. How a review is checked before it appears is described below.
Wrike
No reviews yet. Nothing has been published here yet, and no score is shown. How a review is checked before it appears is described below.
Before sending, the author has to confirm three things: that they have used the product themselves, that they work neither for the vendor nor for a competitor, and that nobody is paying them for the review. We also ask whether the vendor invited them to write it. That answer is required, either answer is accepted, and it stays with the review.
Every review is read by a person before it appears. An email address is required and is confirmed: we send a link to it, and a review does not reach us until the author opens that link, so a review has a sender who was reachable at least once rather than being anonymous. Where what somebody writes needs backing, we ask them for evidence that they used the product, and a review that does not get it is not published. We publish positive and negative reviews alike, we pay nothing and offer nothing for a review, and we accept none that was bought or incentivised.
What we cannot do is verify a purchase. There is no shop here and no account, so whether the author really used the tool rests on their own declaration, on whatever we ask them for, and on the plausibility of what they write. We say so rather than implying a check that does not exist.
A vendor cannot buy a review, and cannot have one removed or changed because they dislike it. We remove or edit a review only if it breaks our rules or the law, for example a false statement of fact. Paid placement has no effect on which reviews appear or on any score.
Where this comes from
Asana https://asana.com · checked against the official source on 2026-09-27
Wrike https://www.wrike.com · no check date recorded yet
This table lists factual criteria taken from information the vendors publish themselves. For how we put it together, see the methodology.