Project Management Comparison

Troi vs. Wrike

At a glance

Troi

Best for

Best for project-based agencies and service providers that need budgets, time, resources and billing in one ERP.

Small and mid-sized
Enterprise

Wrike

Best for

Best for resource-heavy and creative teams that need capacity planning and proofing.

Small and mid-sized
Enterprise

Cataleo does not name a winner. Both statements come from the vendors themselves.

Full Comparison

Criterion	Troi	Wrike
Starting price	From €19 / user / month Troi Teams licence. Licences are freely combinable.	Free; Team from ~$9.80 / user / month Business ~$24.80 per user and month, Enterprise and Pinnacle on request. The free tier is limited.
Free trial	20 days, all features	Free tier plus trial
Users	13,500+	Not stated
Languages	German, English	Not stated
Hosting	EU (Austria), ISO/IEC 27001 certified, GDPR-compliant	Not stated
Made in	Munich	USA
Task planning	Yes	Yes, with custom workflows
Resource planning	Yes	Yes, native resource management and capacity planning
Time tracking	Yes	Yes, native
Reporting and controlling	Yes, reporting and controlling	Yes
Integrations and API	Yes, integrations and API	Yes, integrations
AI features	Yes	Yes
MCP-ready	No	stated Yes
Deployment	Cloud (SaaS), Browser-based	Cloud (SaaS), Browser-based
Support	Email helpdesk, Phone	more entries Email helpdesk, Chat, Phone, Community forum
Onboarding	Documentation and knowledge base, Live online demos and webinars, Personal consulting	more entries Documentation and knowledge base, Video tutorials, Live online demos and webinars, Guided onboarding, Personal consulting
Company size	Small and mid-sized, Enterprise	Small and mid-sized, Enterprise
Integrations	more entries Asana, Jira, Microsoft 365, Microsoft Exchange (Outlook), Microsoft Power BI, Personio, HubSpot, Memtime, Spendesk, DATEV, Bexio	Slack, Microsoft Teams, Google Workspace, Salesforce, Adobe Creative Cloud, Jira

Compare more tools

Row where the values differ The small markers point at the lower number, the longer list or the stated feature. They describe the data, they are not a verdict.

The short version

Key Differences

Starting price Troi From €19 / user / month Wrike Free; Team from ~$9.80 / user / month
Free trial Troi 20 days, all features Wrike Free tier plus trial
Support Troi Email helpdesk, Phone Wrike Email helpdesk, Chat, Phone, Community forum
Made in Troi Munich Wrike USA
MCP-ready Troi No Wrike Yes

Every line is one datapoint from the table above, picked automatically. Nothing here is written text.

The trade-offs

Strengths and Limitations

Troi

Strengths

Covers costing, time tracking, resource planning and accounting in one system
Hosted in the EU (Austria), ISO/IEC 27001 certified and GDPR-compliant
Trial covers all features for 20 days

Limitations

Interface is available in German and English only

Wrike

Strengths

Native resource management and capacity planning
Strong proofing for creative teams
Custom workflows on tasks

Limitations

Business tier is expensive
Interface has a learning curve

Plans

Pricing

Troi

Troi Teams €19 Per user and month. For operational team members, including time tracking and editing project tasks.
Troi Professional €49 Per user and month. The full feature set for project leads, all in one.
Troi Enterprise On request For large-scale, complex project environments.

Visit site

Wrike

Free $0 Limited feature set.
Team ~$9.80 Per user and month.
Business ~$24.80 Per user and month.
Enterprise Custom On request.
Pinnacle Custom On request.

Visit site

What users say

Review Scores · opens after launch

Troi

Ease of use: Not rated yet
User interface: Not rated yet
Onboarding: Not rated yet
Support and service: Not rated yet
Value for money: Not rated yet
Features: Not rated yet

No reviews yet. Nothing has been published here yet, and no score is shown. How a review is checked before it appears is described below.

Wrike

Ease of use: Not rated yet
User interface: Not rated yet
Onboarding: Not rated yet
Support and service: Not rated yet
Value for money: Not rated yet
Features: Not rated yet

No reviews yet. Nothing has been published here yet, and no score is shown. How a review is checked before it appears is described below.

How we check reviews

Before sending, the author has to confirm three things: that they have used the product themselves, that they work neither for the vendor nor for a competitor, and that nobody is paying them for the review. We also ask whether the vendor invited them to write it. That answer is required, either answer is accepted, and it stays with the review.

Every review is read by a person before it appears. An email address is required and is confirmed: we send a link to it, and a review does not reach us until the author opens that link, so a review has a sender who was reachable at least once rather than being anonymous. Where what somebody writes needs backing, we ask them for evidence that they used the product, and a review that does not get it is not published. We publish positive and negative reviews alike, we pay nothing and offer nothing for a review, and we accept none that was bought or incentivised.

What we cannot do is verify a purchase. There is no shop here and no account, so whether the author really used the tool rests on their own declaration, on whatever we ask them for, and on the plausibility of what they write. We say so rather than implying a check that does not exist.

A vendor cannot buy a review, and cannot have one removed or changed because they dislike it. We remove or edit a review only if it breaks our rules or the law, for example a false statement of fact. Paid placement has no effect on which reviews appear or on any score.

Read the full version on our methodology page

Where this comes from

Troi https://troi.de · checked against the official source on 2026-08-14

Wrike https://www.wrike.com · no check date recorded yet

This table lists factual criteria taken from information the vendors publish themselves. For how we put it together, see the methodology.