Resource Management by Smartsheet
Best for
Best for professional services and agency teams already on Smartsheet that need capacity planning and utilization reporting.
- Small and mid-sized
- Enterprise
Resource Planning Comparison
At a glance
Resource Management by Smartsheet
Best for
Best for professional services and agency teams already on Smartsheet that need capacity planning and utilization reporting.
Best for
Best for firms that need 6-month capacity forecasting and what-if scenario planning.
Cataleo does not name a winner. Both statements come from the vendors themselves.
| Criterion | Resource Management by Smartsheet | Runn |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Price on request Smartsheet shows no figure for the add-on and asks for a demo request instead. | Lite from $7 / resource seat / month Standard $11 per seat and month, Advanced on request. Seats count resources in the planner, not users with a login. Volume discounts start at 100+ seats. |
| Free trial | Not stated | 30-day trial of the Standard plan, no card required |
| API | Yes, a REST API against the Resource Management database | Not stated |
| Made in | Not stated | New Zealand |
| Resource planning | Yes, matching people to projects by skills and availability, workload and capacity views, staffing forecasts and what-if scenario planning | Yes, real-time capacity planning with saved what-if scenarios, placeholders, skills and tags |
| Task planning | At phase level: a project splits into phases with their own dates, budget and bill rates, work items and tasks sit under a phase in the worklist, and the schedule is an interactive timeline where phase and assignment bars are dragged to new dates. Phases carry no dependencies between them | Yes, project timelines with estimates, phases and milestones |
| Time tracking | Yes, optional, in half-day, hours-and-minutes or itemized modes, with expenses against the project budget and an approval step | Yes, timesheets from the Standard plan |
| Reporting and controlling | Yes, pre-built utilization, time and fees, expense and budget reports | Yes, utilization, capacity, performance, workforce and bench reporting, with planned versus actuals against project budgets |
| AI features | No | stated Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS), Browser-based | Cloud (SaaS), Browser-based |
| Support | Email helpdesk, Community forum | Email helpdesk, Chat |
| Onboarding | Documentation and knowledge base, Personal consulting | Documentation and knowledge base, Guided onboarding |
| Company size | Small and mid-sized, Enterprise | Small and mid-sized, Enterprise |
| Integrations | Smartsheet, Zapier, QuickBooks, Google Calendar, Outlook, Apple iCloud | more entries Jira, Harvest, Clockify, BambooHR, HiBob, Gusto, Workday, Sage HR, Zapier, n8n |
Adds a column to the table, from the tools in this category.
Row where the values differ The small markers point at the lower number, the longer list or the stated feature. They describe the data, they are not a verdict.
The short version
Every line is one datapoint from the table above, picked automatically. Nothing here is written text.
The trade-offs
Resource Management by Smartsheet
Strengths
Limitations
Runn
Strengths
Limitations
Plans
Resource Management by Smartsheet
Runn
What users say
Resource Management by Smartsheet
No reviews yet. Nothing has been published here yet, and no score is shown. How a review is checked before it appears is described below.
Runn
No reviews yet. Nothing has been published here yet, and no score is shown. How a review is checked before it appears is described below.
Before sending, the author has to confirm three things: that they have used the product themselves, that they work neither for the vendor nor for a competitor, and that nobody is paying them for the review. We also ask whether the vendor invited them to write it. That answer is required, either answer is accepted, and it stays with the review.
Every review is read by a person before it appears. An email address is required and is confirmed: we send a link to it, and a review does not reach us until the author opens that link, so a review has a sender who was reachable at least once rather than being anonymous. Where what somebody writes needs backing, we ask them for evidence that they used the product, and a review that does not get it is not published. We publish positive and negative reviews alike, we pay nothing and offer nothing for a review, and we accept none that was bought or incentivised.
What we cannot do is verify a purchase. There is no shop here and no account, so whether the author really used the tool rests on their own declaration, on whatever we ask them for, and on the plausibility of what they write. We say so rather than implying a check that does not exist.
A vendor cannot buy a review, and cannot have one removed or changed because they dislike it. We remove or edit a review only if it breaks our rules or the law, for example a false statement of fact. Paid placement has no effect on which reviews appear or on any score.
Where this comes from
Resource Management by Smartsheet https://www.smartsheet.com/platform/resource-management · no check date recorded yet
Runn https://www.runn.io · no check date recorded yet
This table lists factual criteria taken from information the vendors publish themselves. For how we put it together, see the methodology.